Advertisement

Case Studies: Soil as the Interface of the Ecosystem Goal Function and the Earth System Goal Function

  • Steven Cousins
  • Mark Rounsevell
Conference paper

Abstract

Ecosystem boundaries are chosen such that a domain is defined where a single ecosystem goal operates as the system attractor. Other goals may still operate on this area because the ecosystem contains semi-autonomous parts which are the organisms in a food web. It is possible for parts to have separate goals when the parts are separated from the whole by buffers or stores. The directed movement of water is defined here as the earth system goal. Ecosystems as goal directed objects are defined as the abundance of different sized organisms on the territory of the top predators. Fat decouples organisms from the ecosystem food web; the ecosystem food web is decoupled from climate by water storage in soil. Because the ecosystem is decoupled from its parts it can possess a goal; goal function equations for ecosystems and for water transfer in soil are given.

Keywords

Hydraulic Conductivity System Boundary Goal Function System Goal Single Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen TFH and Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Cousins SH (1985) The trophic continuum in marine ecosystems: structure and equations for a predictive model. Can Bull fish and Aq Sci 213:76–93Google Scholar
  3. Cousins SH (1990) Countable ecosystems deriving from a new food web entity. Oikos 57:270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cousins SH (1996) Food webs: from the Lindeman paradigm to a taxonomic general theory of ecology. In: Polis GA and Winemiller KO (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Hall DGM, Reeve MJ, Thomasson AJ and Wright VF (1977) Water retention, porosity and density of field soils. Soil Survey Technical Monograph No. 9. Soil Survey of England and Wales, HarpendenGoogle Scholar
  6. Holdridge LR (1947) Determination of world plant formulations from simple climatic data. Science 105:367–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenny H (1941) Factors of soil formation. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Lawton JH and Jones CG (1995) Linking species and ecosystems: organisms as engineers. In: Jones CG and Lawton JH (eds) Linking species and ecosystems. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindeman, RL (1942) The trophic dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23:399–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mackney D, Hodgson JM, Hollis JM and Staines SJ (1983) Legend for the 1:250,000 soil map of England and Wales. Soil Survey of England and Wales, HarpendenGoogle Scholar
  11. Martinez ND (1995) Unifying ecological subdisciplines with ecosystem food webs. In: Jones CG and Lawton JH (eds) Linking species and Ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. McNaughton SJ, Oesterheld M, Frank DA and Williams KJ (1989) Ecosystem patterns in pri-mary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats. Nature 341:142–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Park J and Cousins SH (1995) Soil biological health and agro-ecological change. Ag Ecosys Env 56:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Platt T, Lewis M and Geider R (1984) Thermodynamics of the pelagic ecosystem: Elementary closure conditions for biological production in the open ocean. In: Fasham MJR (ed) Flows of energy and materials in marine ecosystems: theory and practice. Plenum Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schlesinger WH (1985) Changes in soil carbon and associated properties with disturbance and recovery. In: Traflka JT, Reichle DE (eds) The carbon cycle: a global analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Schlesinger WH (1991) Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change. Academic press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Silvert W and Platt T (1980) Dynamic energy flow model of the particle size distribution in pelagic ecosystems. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, New HampshireGoogle Scholar
  19. Simon HA (1973) The organisation of complex systems. In: Pattee HH (ed) Hierarchy theory. Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16:284–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. White RE (1981) Introduction to the principles and practices of soil science. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Cousins
  • Mark Rounsevell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations