Some remarks on instrumental variables

  • Guido W. Imbens
Part of the ZEW Economic Studies book series (ZEW, volume 13)

Abstract

There has been much work on identification and inference with instrumental variables in the last decade. Researchers have investigated conditions for identification of causal effects without normality, linearity, and additivity assumptions. In this discussion, I will comment on some of the new results in this area and discuss some implications for applied researchers in the context of some specific examples, focussing on identification rather than inference. Most of the comments will be limited to the case with a binary endogenous

Keywords

Instrumental variables causal inference treatment effects potential outcomes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadie, A. (1999): Semiparametric Estimation of Instrumental Variable Models for Causal Effects. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  2. Angrist, J. D. (1990): Lifetime Earnings and the Vietnam Era Draft Lottery: Evidence from Social Security Administrative Records. American Economic Review 80, 313–335.Google Scholar
  3. Angrist, J. D., Graddy, K., Imbens, G. W. (2000): Non-parametric Demand Analysis with an Application to the Demand for Fish. Review of Economic Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W. (1995): Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation of Average Causal Effects in Models with Variable Treatment Intensity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (June), 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., Rubin, D. B (1996): Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (June), 444–472. (with discussion).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angrist, J., Krueger, A. (1991): Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 979–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Angrist, J. D., Krueger, A. (1995): Split Sample Instrumental Variables Estimates of the Return to Schooling. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13 (2), 225–235.Google Scholar
  8. Athey, S., Stern, S. (1998): An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories About Complementarity in Organizational Design. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, MIT.Google Scholar
  9. Balke, A., Pearl, J. (1994): Nonparametric Bounds of Causal Effects from Partial Compliance Data. Technical Report R-199-J, Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  10. Bound, J., Jaeger, D., Baker, R. (1995): Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation between Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (June), 443–450.Google Scholar
  11. Chamberlain, G., Imbens, G. (1996): Hierarchical Bayes Models with Many Instruments. NBER technical working paper T0204.Google Scholar
  12. Cook, P., Tauchen, G. (1982): The Effect of Liquor Taxes on Heavy Drinking. Bell Journal of Economics 13, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher, R. A. (1925): Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 1st Edition, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  14. Haavelmo, T. (1943): Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations. Econometrica 11, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heckman, J. (1978): Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equations System. Econometrica 46, 931–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heckman, Robb, R. (1985): Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions. In: Heckman, J., Singer, B. (Eds.): Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heckman, J., Honoré, B. (1990): The Empirical Content of the Roy Model. Econometrica 58 (5), 1121–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heckman, J. (1997): Instrumental Variables: A Study of Implicit Behavioral Assumptions Used in Making Program Evaluations. Journal of Human Resources 32 (2), 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirano, K., Imbens, G., Rubin, D., Zhou, A. (2000): Estimating the Effect of Flu Shots in a Randomized Encouragement Design. Biostatistics 1(1), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holland, P. (1986): Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 945–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ichino, A., Winter-Ebmer, R. (1998): The Long-run Educational Cost of World War II: An Example of Local Average Treatment Effect Estimation. CEPR Discussion paper 1895.Google Scholar
  22. Imbens, G. W., Angrist, J. D. (1994): Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica 62 (2), 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Imbens, G. W., Rubin, D. B. (1997a): Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects in Randomized Experiments with Noncompliance. Annals of Statistics 25, 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Imbens, G. W., Rubin, D. B. (1997b): Estimating Outcome Distributions for Compliers in Instrumental Variables Models. Review of Economic Studies 64 (4), 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manski, C. F. (1990): Non-parametric Bounds on Treatment Effects. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 80, 319–323.Google Scholar
  26. Manski, C. F. (1995): Identification Problems in the Social Sciences, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Manski, C., Pepper, J. (2000): Monotone Instrumental Variables. Econometrica (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  28. Neyman, J. (1923): On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Translation in Statistical Science 5 (4), 465–480, (1990).Google Scholar
  29. Robins, J. M. (1989): The Analysis of Randomized and Non-Randomized AIDS Treatment Trials Using a New Approach to Causal Inference in Longitudinal Studies. In: Sechrest, L., Freeman, H., Bailey, A. (Eds.): Health Service Research Methodology: A Focus on AIDS. U.S. Public Health Service, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  30. Rosenbaum, P., Rubin, D.B. (1983): The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 (1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rubin, D. B. (1978a): Bayesian inference for causal effects: The Role of Randomization. Annals of Statistics 6, 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Staiger, D., Stock, J. (1997): Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments. Econometrica 65 (3), 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tinbergen, J. (1928): Determination and Interpretation of Supply Curves: An Example. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie (reprinted in: The Foundations of Econometrics, Hendry and Morgan (Eds)).Google Scholar
  34. Vytlacil, E. (1999): Independence, Monotonicity, and Latent Index Models: An Equivalency Result. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido W. Imbens

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations