Environmental Regulation and Productivity Growth: An Analysis of U.S. Manufacturing Industries
Conference paper
Abstract
We show that traditional measures of productivity change that ignore the unproductive nature of pollution abatement capital within the production process are likely to underestimate the true productivity gains that most manufacturing industries are able to generate in any given year. While the average bias of traditional measures is not large in absolute terms,the bias can be substantial for industries with relatively large pollution abatement capital expenditures. We also find that environmental regulation has a non-trivial adverse effect on productivity change,lowering productivity growth by roughly 0.3% across all industries,and by more than 1% for some industries.
Keywords
Productivity change pollution abatement capital expenditure capital adjustment bias environmental regulation bias U.S. manufacturing industriesPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Acemoglu, D. and F. Zilibotti (2001), Productivity DifferencesQuarterly Journal of Economics116 (2), 563–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bernard, A.B. and C.I. Jones (1996), Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement Across Industries and CountriesAmerican Economic Review86 (5), 1216–1238.Google Scholar
- Berteisman, E.J. and W. Gray (1996)NBER Manufacturing Productivity DatabaseNBER Technical Working Paper No. 205.Google Scholar
- Conrad, K. and C.J. Morrison (1989), The Impact of Pollution Abatement Investment on Productivity Change: An Empirical Comparison of the U.S., Germany, and CanadaSouthern Economic Journal55 (3), 684–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hulten, C.R. (1992), Growth Accounting When Technical Change is Embodied in CapitalAmerican Economic Review82 (4), 964–980.Google Scholar
- Maddison, A. (1987), Growth and Slowdown in Advanced Capitalist Economies: Techniques of Quantitative AssessmentJournal of Economic Literature25 (2), 649–706.Google Scholar
- Nadiri, M.I. (1970), Some Approaches to the Theory and Measurement of Total Factor Productivity: A SurveyJournal of Economic Literature8 (4), 1137–1177.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R.R. (1981), Research on Productivity Growth and Productivity Differences: Dead Ends and New DeparturesJournal of Economic Literature19 (3), 1029–1064.Google Scholar
- Osang, T. and A. Nandy (2000), Impact of U.S. Environmental Regulation on the Competitiveness of Manufacturing IndustriesIn Submission. Google Scholar
- Wolf, E.N. (1996), The Productivity Slowdown: The Culprit at Last? Follow up on Hulten and WolffAmerican Economic Review86 (5), 1239–1252Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003