Advertisement

Systematics and Distribution of the Recent Margaritiferidae

  • Douglas G. Smith
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 145)

Abstract

A study of the morphologically conservative and allegedly most primitive family of freshwater mussels, the Margaritiferidae, can provide much information in understanding the evolution and adaptive radiation of the only large uniquely freshwater bivalve group, the Unionoida. Although containing only about 5% of the described and recognized unionoid species occurring in Holarctic regions, the Margaritiferidae is wide-ranging in its distribution. Recent species are known from the North American continent, Europe including northernmost Africa, the Middle East, and throughout much of southern and eastern Asia. Margaritiferids, colloquially known as pearl mussels, have received intense study only in the areas of life history, generally confined to European populations, and in earlier literature the general pattern of distribution. Very little work has been done on the relationships among the known species of the family and the characteristics used to assign species to the family. In order to provide a foundation for the ensuing discussion, a brief description of the Margaritiferidae and a definition of the morphological and anatomical traits that diagnose the family from other unionoid groups is presented.

Keywords

Shell Length Freshwater Mussel Anterior Cusp Posterior Cusp Salmonid Fish 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Araujo R, Ramos MA (1998) Description of the glochidium of Margaritifera auricularia (Spengler 1793) (Bivalvia, Unionoidea). Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 353:1553–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awakura T (1968) The ecology of parasitic glochidia of the fresh-water pearl mussel, Margaritifera laevis (Haas). Sci Rep Hokkaido Salmon Hatchery 23:1–21 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. Bauer G (1986) The status of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. in the south of its European range. Biol Conserv 38:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloomer HH (1928) Margaritfera durrovensis — anatomical notes. Proc Malacol Soc Lond 18:74–76Google Scholar
  5. Chesney HCG, Oliver PG, Davis GM (1993) Margaritifera durrovensis Phillips, 1928: taxonomic status, ecology and conservation. J Conchol 34:267–299Google Scholar
  6. Davis GM, Fuller SLH (1981) Genetic relationships among Recent Unionacea (Bivalvia) of North America. Malacologia 20:217–253Google Scholar
  7. Falkner G (1994) Systematik vorderorientalischer Najaden als Vorstudie zur Bearbeitung archäologischer Funde. In: Kokabi M, Wahl J (eds) Sonderdruck aus Beiträge zur Archäozoologie und Prähistorischen Anthropologie. Forsch Ber Vor Frühgeschichte Baden-Württemberg 53:135–162Google Scholar
  8. Haas F (1910) Pseudunio, neues Genus für Unio sinuatus Lam. Nachrichtsbl Dtsch Malakozool Ges 42:181–183Google Scholar
  9. Haas F (1912) 5. Genus Margaritinopsis Haas 1912. Martini und Chemnitz, Systematisches Conchyliencabinet IX. 2(11):121–123, Taf 12 (1,2). Baver and Raspe, NürenburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Haas F (1940) A tentative classification of the Palearctic unionids. Field Mus Nat Hist Zool Ser 24:115–141Google Scholar
  11. Haas F (1969) Das Tierreich. Lieferung 88 — Superfamilia Unionacea. de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Hannibal H (1912) A synopsis of the Recent and Tertiary freshwater Mollusca of the Californian Province, based upon an ontogenetic classification. Proc Malacol Soc Lond 10:112–165Google Scholar
  13. Heard WH, Guckert RH (1970) A re-evaluation of the Recent Unionacea (Pelecypoda) of North America. Malacologia 10:333–355Google Scholar
  14. IUCN (1983) The IUCN invertebrate red date book. International Union of Conservation of Nature. Gland, Switzerland, 632 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson JW (1925) The distribution of Margaritifera margaritifera in the British Isles. Part I. J Conchol 17:195–204Google Scholar
  16. Johnson RI (1971) The types and figured specimens of Unionacea (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in the British Museum (Natural History). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Zool 20:75–108Google Scholar
  17. Johnson RI (1983) Margaritifera marrianae, a new species of Unionacea (Bivalvia: Margaritiferidae) from the Mobile-Alabama-Coosa and Escambia River systems, Alabama. Occas Pap Mollusks Mus Comp Zool Harv Univ 4:299–304Google Scholar
  18. Jungbluth J, Lehmann G (1976) Studies on the distribution, morphology and ecology of the Margaritifera populations in the atypical biotopes of the young Tertiary basalt area of the Vogelsberg/Upper Hesse (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Arch Hydrobiol 78:165–212 (in German)Google Scholar
  19. Kat PW (1983) Conchiolin layers among the Unionidae and Margaritiferidae (Bivalvia): microsculptural characteristics and taxonomic implications. Malacologia 24:298–311Google Scholar
  20. Kearney MP (1975) European distribution maps of Pomatias elegans (Muller), Discus ruderatus (Ferussac), Eobania vermiculata (Muller) and Margaritifera margaritifera (Linne). Arch Molluskenkd 106:243–249Google Scholar
  21. Kennard AS, Salisbury AE, Woodward BB (1925) Notes on the British Post-Pliocene Unionidae with more especial regard to the means of identification of fossil fragments. Proc Malacol Soc Lond 16:267–290Google Scholar
  22. Kinzelbach R (1987) Faunal history of freshwater invertebrates of the northern Levant. In: Krupp F, Schneider W, Kinzelbach R (eds) Proceedings of the symposium on the fauna and zoogeography of the Middle East. Dr Ludwig Reichert, Wiesbaden, pp 115–128Google Scholar
  23. Kinzelbach RK, Roth G (1984) Patterns of distribution of some freshwater molluscs of the Levant region. Foliae Hist-Nat Mus Matrensis 9:115–128Google Scholar
  24. Lefevre G, Curtis WC (1912) Studies on the reproduction and artificial propogation of freshwater mussels. Bull Bur Fish 30:105–201Google Scholar
  25. Lydeard C, Mulvey M, Davis GM (1996) Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits of North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 351:1593–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Modell H (1964) Das natürliche System der Najaden. 3. Arch Molluskenkd 93:71–126Google Scholar
  27. Murphy G (1942) Relationship of the fresh-water mussel to trout in the Truckee River. Calif Fish Game 28:89–102Google Scholar
  28. Nesemann H (1993) Zoogeographie und Taxonomie der Muschel-Gattungen Unio Philipsson 1788, Pseudanodonta Bourguignat 1877 und Pseudunio Hass 1910 im oberen und mittleren Donausystem (Bivalvia: Unionidae, Margaritiferidae). Nachrichtenbl Ersten Vorarlberger Malakol Ges 1:20–40Google Scholar
  29. Nezlin LP, Cunjak RA, Zotin AA, Ziuganov VV (1994) Glochidium morphology of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) and glochidiosis of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): a study by scanning electron microscopy. Can J Zool 72:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ortmann AE (1910) A new system of the Unionidae. Nautilus 23:114–120Google Scholar
  31. Ortmann AE (1911) The anatomical structure of certain exotic naiades compared with that of the North American forms. Nautilus 24:127–131Google Scholar
  32. Ortmann AE (1912a) Notes upon the families and genera of naiades. Ann Carnegie Mus 8:222–365Google Scholar
  33. Ortmann AE (1912b) Cumberlandia, a new genus of naiades. Nautilus 26:13–14Google Scholar
  34. Ortmann AE (1919) A monograph of the naiades of Pennsylvania. Part III. Systematic account of the genera and species. Mem Carnegie Mus 8:1–384Google Scholar
  35. Pallary P (1920) Récoltes malacologiques du Captaine Paul Martel dans la Partie Septenrionale du Maroc. J Conchyliol 65:131–160Google Scholar
  36. Pallary P (1927) Complément a la fauna Malacologique de la Berbérie. J Conchyliol 71:197–277Google Scholar
  37. Pallary P (1928) Notice sur seize mollusques nouveaux du Maroc decouverts en 1926 et 1927. J Conchyliol 72:1–24Google Scholar
  38. Pekkarinen M, Valovirta I (1996) Anatomy of the glochidia of the freshwater pearl mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Arch Hydrobiol 137:411–423Google Scholar
  39. Scharff RF (1911) Distribution and origin of life in America. Constable, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schütt H (1983) Die Molluskenfauna derSü ßwässer im Einzugsgebiet des Orontes unter Berücksichtigung benachbarter Flußsysteme. Arch Molluskenkd 113:17–91Google Scholar
  41. Schütt H (1987) The molluscs of the Oasis Palmyra. In: Krupp F, Schneider W, Kinzelbach R (eds) Proceedings of the symposium on the fauna and zoogeography of the Middle East. Dr Ludwig Reichert, Wiesbaden, pp 62–72Google Scholar
  42. Simpson CT (1900) Synopsis of the Naiades, or pearly fresh-water mussels. Proc U S Nat Mus 22:501–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simpson CT (1914) A descriptive catalogue of the Naiades or pearly freshwater mussels. Bryant Walker, Detroit, Michigan SmithGoogle Scholar
  44. Simpson DG (1976a) Notes on the biology of Margaritifera margaritifera margaritifera (Lin.) in central Massachusetts. Am Midl Nat 96:252–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith DG (1976b) The distribution of the Margaritiferidae: a review and a new synthesis. Am Malacol Union Inc Bull 1976:42 (Abstr)Google Scholar
  46. Smith DG (1979) Marsupial anatomy of the demibranch of Margaritifera margaritifera (Linn.) in northeastern North America (Pelecypoda: Unionacea). J Molluscan Stud 45:39–44Google Scholar
  47. Smith DG (1980) Anatomical studies on Margaritifera margaritifera and Cumberlandia monodonta (Mollusca: Pelecypoda: Margaritiferidae). Zool J Linn Soc 69:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith DG (1983) On the so-called mantle muscle scars on shells of the Margaritiferidae (Mollusca, Pelecypoda), with observations on mantle-shell attachment in the Unionoida and Trigonioida. Zool Scr 12:67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith DG (1986) The stomach anatomy of some eastern North American Margaritiferidae (Unionoida: Unionacea). Am Malacol Bull 4:13–19Google Scholar
  50. Smith DG (1988) Notes on the biology and morphology of Margaritifera hembeli (Conrad, 1838) (Unionacea: Margaritiferidae). Nautilus 102:159–163Google Scholar
  51. Smith DG (Accepted) Observations on the morphology and anatomy of Dahurinaia dahurica (Middendorff, 1850) (Unionoida: Margaritiferidae). J ConcholGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith DG, Wall WP (1984) The Margaritiferidae reinstated: a reply to Davis and Fulller (1981), Genetic relationships among Recent Unionacea (Bivalvia) of North America. Occas Pap Mollusks Mus Comp Zool Harv Univ 4:321–330Google Scholar
  53. Starobogatov Y (1970) Molluscan fauna and zoogeography of the continental water bodies. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian)Google Scholar
  54. Starobogatov Y (1995) The pearly freshwater mussels (Mollusca, Unionoida, Margaritiferidae of Russia. In: Valovirta I, Harding PT, Kirne D (eds) Proc 9th Int Colloq Eur Invertebrate Survey, Helsinki, 3–4 September 1993. WWF Finland Rep (7):109–123Google Scholar
  55. Taylor DW (1988) Aspects of freshwater mollusc ecological biogeography. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 62:511–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor DW, Uyeno T (1965) Evolution of host specificity of freshwater salmonid fishes and mussels in the North Pacific region. Venus 24:199–209 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  57. Watters GT (1994) An annotated bibliography of the reproduction and propagation of the Unionoidea (primarily of North America). Ohio Biol Surv Mise Contrib 1Google Scholar
  58. Zatravkin MN, Bogatov VV (1987) Large bivalve freshwater and brackish water mollusks of the Far East of the U.S.S.R. Academy Sciences, USSR Vladivostok (in Russian)Google Scholar
  59. Zhadin VI (1965) Mollusks of fresh and brackish waters of the U.S.S.R. Israel Program Scientific Translations, Jerusalem. (Originally published in Russian as Keys to the fauna of the U.S.S.R. No 46. Academy Sciences, USSR, Moscow, 1952)Google Scholar
  60. Ziuganov V, Zotin A, Nezlin L, Tretiakov V (1994) The freshwater pearl mussels and their relationships with salmonid fish. (English edition) VNIRO Publishing House, MoscowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas G. Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations