High Quality Mobile Communication
Future communication environments have to support mobility at various levels ranging from device and personal to session and service mobility. Much effort is currently beeing spent in the areas of cellular access technology, wireless LAN technology and mobility support in IP (Mobile IP). There is a clear trend that the IP protocol is becoming the dominant networking protocol. Since standard IP networks do not provide any guarantees for the transmission quality parameters, there is a clear demand for a comprehensive QoS mechanism, which allows for adaptation in a mobile environment using heterogeneous devices with heterogeneous access networks.
In this paper we present a project on defining and implementing a comprehensive QoS framework for ’Mobility and Service Adaption in Heterogeneous Mobile Communication Networks’ (MASA). Our thesis is that, in order to provide high quality communication for mobile users, media processing facilities as well as mobility handling and handoff decision mechanisms should be closely integrated into a QoS framework. This allows, e.g., to base handoff decisions on all available QoS elements such as availability of transcoding units or local resource management. The MASA framework is able to release applications of QoS-related work as much as possible and, in addition, hides the complexity of network QoS mechanisms from the applications. The MASA QoS framework is able to support users with the ability to continue ongoing sessions even during handoffs and device changes (session mobility).
We present an outline of the general MASA architecture, consisting of distributed autonomous QoS Brokers that can be placed on the (potentially mobile) end-system, on intermediate network nodes (e.g. router, switches) and on transcoding units (gateways). The Brokers are supported by Managers and Controllers responsible for different tasks like resource, network, media, policy and mobility management. As an example, wedescribe the internal structure of the MASA Mobility Manager.
Key wordsQoS Mobility Management Seamless Handover Wireless Networks
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.A. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. RFC2475: An Architecture for Differentiated Services. IETF.Google Scholar
- 3.A. Campbell, G. Coulson, and D. Hutchinson. A Quality of Service Architecture. ACM Computer Communication Review, April 1994.Google Scholar
- 4.Dynamics. Mobile IPv4 implementation. http://www.cs.hut.fi/Research/Dynamics/.Google Scholar
- 6.S. Gai, J. Strassner, D. Durham, S. Herzog, H. Mahon, and F. Reichmeyer. Internet Draft: QoS Policy Framework Architecture. IETF, February 1999.Google Scholar
- 7.S. Gessler, O. Haase, and A. Schrader. A Service Platform for Intelligent Internet Telephony. In The 1st IP Telephony Workshop (GI), April 2000.Google Scholar
- 8.H. Hartenstein, K. Jonas, and R. Schmitz. Seamless Inter-Domain Handoffs via Simultaneous Bindings. Proc. European Wireless 2000, Dresden, Germany, September 2000.Google Scholar
- 9.A. Kassler and P. Schulthess. An End-to-End Quality of Service Management Architecture for Wireless ATM Networks. In Proc. HICSS,32, Hawaii, Jan 1999.Google Scholar
- 11.K. Nahrstedt. An Architecture for End-to-End Quality of Service Provision and its Experimental Validation. PhD thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, August 1995.Google Scholar
- 12.D. Clark R. Braden and S. Shenker. RFC1633: Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview. IETF, June 1994.Google Scholar
- 13.J. D. Solomon. Mobile IP. Prentice Hall, 1998.Google Scholar
- 14.Sun. The Java Media Framework Version 2.0 API. http://java.sun.com/products-/java-media/jmf.Google Scholar
- 15.N. Tripathi, J. Reed, and H. VanLandingham. Handoff in cellular systems. IEEE Personal Communications, Dec. 1998.Google Scholar
- 16.N. Yeadon, F. Garcia, D. Hutchinson, and D. Shepherd. Filters: QoS Support Mechanisms for Multipeer Communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 14(7), September 1993.Google Scholar