Antigen Recognition: 100 Years After Landsteiner

  • H. N. Eisen
Conference paper

Abstract

A central feature of the adaptive immune system is its capacity to distinguish among an immense number of different structures. The efforts made over the past century to understand this extraordinary ability grew largely from Landsteiner’s work on the reactions of antisera with the small organic molecules he called haptens, or partial antigens, to indicate that they could react specifically with antibodies but not elicit antibody production. It was only near the end of his long, productive life that it became clear (through the work of Heidelberger and colleagues with polysaccharide antigens) that antibodies are proteins. And it was not until a fewyears after his death in 1943 that proteins were shown, by Fred Sanger, to be authentic molecules (rather than colloids) composed of linear chains ofamino acids joined in a peptide bonds. It is thus understandable that in Landsteiner’s monumental monograph on The Specificity of Serological Reactions he cautiously attributed the specificity of antisera to a “…the disproportional action ofa number of similar agents on a variety of related substrata” (1). By agents, he meant antibodies, of course, and by substrata he meant antigens or haptens. Today, having the benefit of over 60 years of further intensive study in many laboratories we can define specificity simply and more clearly as the ability “…to bind one unique chemical structure more strongly than a number of similar alternatives” (2).

Keywords

Delayed Type Hypersensitivity Antigen Recognition Antibody Binding Site Myeloma Protein Clonal Selection Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Landsteiner K (1943) The specificity of serological reactions. Harvard Univ Press Cambridge MA:5Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foote J. Eisen HN (2000) Breaking the affinity ceiling for antibodies and T cell receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eisen HN Siskind GW (1964) Variations in affinities of antibodies during the immune response. Biochem 3:996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eisen HN (1966) The immune response to a simple antigenic determinant. The Harvey Lectures Series 60:1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haurowitz F Breinl F. (1933) Zeit physiol Chem 214:111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pauling L (1940) J Amer Chem Soc 62:2643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burnet FM (1959) The clonal selection theory of aquired immunity. Vanderbilt Univ Press, NashvilleGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Natvig JB Kunkel HG (1973) Human immunoglobulins: classes, subclasses, genetic variants, and idiotypes. Adv Immuno l16:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eisen HN Little JR, Osterland CK Simms ES (1967) A myeloma protein with antibody activity. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 32:75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eisen HN, Potter P Simms E (1968) Mouse myeloma proteins with anti-hapten antibody activity: the protein produced by plasma cell tumor MOPC-315. Biochemistry 7:4126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michaelides MC Eisen HN (1974) The strange cross-reaction of menadione (Vitmin K3) and 2,4-dinitrophenylligands with a myeloma protein and some conventional antibodies. J Exp Med 140:687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fujinami RS, Oldstone MB(1989) Molecular mimicry as a mechanism for viral-induced autoimmunity. Immunol Rev 8:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chase MW (1985) Immunology and experimental dermatology. Ann Rev Immunol 3:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eisen HN Orris L, Belman S (1952) Elicitation of delayed allergic skin reactions with haptens: the dependence of elicitation on hapten combination with protein. J Exp Med 95:473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eisen HN (1990) General Immunology. J.B. Lippincott Co. Philadelphia (also published as a section of Microbiology, 4th edition, by Davis, Dulbecco, Eisen, and Ginsberg):210Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kranz DM, Sherman DH, Sitkovsky MV, Pasternack MS, Eisen HN (1984) Immunoprecipitation of cell surface structures of cloned cytotoxic T lymphocytes by clonespecific antisera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sha WC, Nelson CA, Newberry RD, Kranz DM, Russell JH, Loh DY (1988) Selective expression of an antigen receptor on CD8-bearing T lymphocytes in transgenic mice. Nature 335:271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Udaka K, Tsomides TJ, Eisen HN (1992) A naturally occurring peptide recognized by alloreactive CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in association with a class I MHC protein. Cell 69:989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Udaka K, Tsomides TJ, Walden P, Fukusen N, Eisen HN (1993) Aubiquitous protein is the source of naturally occurring peptides that are recognized by a CD8 T cell clone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sha WC, Nelson CA, Newberry RD, Pullen JK, Pease LR, Russell JH, Loh DY (1990) Positive selection of transgenic receptor-bearing thymocytes by Kb antigen is altered by Kb mutations that involve peptide binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:6186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tallquist MD, Yun TJ, Pease LR (1996) A single T cell receptor recognizes structurally distinct MHC/peptide complexes with high specificity. J Exp Med 184:1017PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu M, Tsomides TJ, Eisen HN (1995) Tissue distribution of natural peptides derived from a ubiquitous dehydrogenase, including a novel liver-specific peptide that demonstrates the pronounced specificity oflow affinity T cell reactions. J Immunol 154:4495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eisen HN, Sykulev Y, Tsomides T (1996) Antigen specific T-cell receptors and their reactions with complexes formed by peptides with major histocompatibility complex proteins. Adv Protein Chem 49:1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maurice MM, Gould DS, Carroll J, Vugmeyster Y, Ploegh HL (2000) Positive selection of an MHC class 1-restricted TCR in the absence of classical MHC class 1 molecules. SubmittedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wucherpfennig KW, Strominger JL (1995) Molecular mimicry in T cell-mediated autoimmunity: viral pep tides activate human T cell clones specific for myelin basic protein. Cell 80:695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Joshi SK, Suresh PR, Chauhan VS (2000) Flexibility in MHC and TCR recognition: degenerate specificity at the T cell level in the recognition of promiscuous TH epitopes exhibiting no primary sequence homology. J Immunol in pressGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sykulev Y, Brunmark A, Jackson M, Cohen RJ, Peterson PA, Eisen HN (1994) Kinetics and affinity of reactions between an antigen-specific T-cell-receptor and peptide-MHC complexes. Immunity 1:15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsomides TJ, Aldovini A, Johnson RP, Walker BD, Young RA, Eisen HN (1994) Naturally processed viral peptides recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes on cells chronically infected by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-l). J Exp Med 180:1283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sykulev Y, Cohen RJ, Eisen HN (1995) The law of mass action governs antigenstimulated cytolytic activity of CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:11990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bell GI, Dembo M, Bongrad P (1984) Cell adhesion. Competition between nonspecific repulsion and specific bonding. Biophys J 45:1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sykulev Y, Joo M, Vturina I, Tsomides T, Eisen HN (1996) Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response. Immunity 4:565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cho BK, Lian K-C, Lee P, Brunmark A, McKinley C, Chen J, Kranz DM, Eisen HN. Submitted. Differences in antigen-recognition and cytolytic activity of CD8+ and CD8 T cells that express the same antigen-specific receptor.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boyd WC, Bernard H (1937) J Immunol 33:111Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eisen HN (2001) Specificity and degeneracy in antigen recognition. Ann Rev Immunol 19:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. N. Eisen
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Cancer Research and Department of BiologyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations