Dry Mouth pp 133-144 | Cite as

Imaging of Salivary Glands

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Imaging of the salivary glands can provide useful information on the status of the glands. Some imaging techniques provide direct evidence of the function of the glands, while others provide indirect information on gland function. This chapter aims to describe the different techniques currently available. The role each imaging modality can play in the investigation of patients with dry mouth is highlighted, along with the limitations of these imaging modalities. The current diagnostic criteria for Sjogren’s syndrome include conventional sialography and scintigraphy. Other techniques that could be considered for incorporation into future diagnostic criteria, based on their proven efficacy in diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome, are discussed.

Keywords

Salivary Gland Parotid Gland Submandibular Gland Cone Beam Compute Tomography Minor Salivary Gland 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Evans RM. Anatomy and technique. In: Ahuja A, Evans R, editors. Practical head and neck ultrasound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradley MJ. Salivary glands. In: Ahuja A, Evans R, editors. Practical head and neck ultrasound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 19–33.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, et al. Classification criteria for Sjogren’s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:554–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown J, Ngu R, Whaites E, et al. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome and correlation with systemic markers. Conference: 10th Biennial Conference of the European Association of Oral Medicine, EAOM 2010 London United Kingdom. Oral Dis. 2010;16:538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown J. Imaging in the patient with hyposalivation. Oral diseases. Conference: 10th Biennial Conference of the European Association of Oral Medicine, EAOM 2010 London United Kingdom. Oral Dis. 2010;16:503–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poul JH, Brown JE, Davies J. Retrospective study of the effectiveness of high-resolution ultrasound compared with sialography in the diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:392–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salaffi F, Carotti M, Iagnocco A, et al. Ultrasonography of salivary glands in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a comparison with contrast sialography and scintigraphy. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1229–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    El Miedany YM, Ahmed I, Mourad HG, et al. Quantitative ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging of the parotid gland: can they replace the histopathologic studies in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome? Joint Bone Spine. 2004;71:29–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whaites E, Drage N. The salivary glands. In: Whaites E, Drage N, editors. Essentials of dental radiography and radiology. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2013. p. 447–60.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benson B. Salivary gland radiology. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2009. p. 478–596.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drage NA, Brown JE. Cone beam computed sialography of sialoliths. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38:301–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abdel-Wahed N, Amer ME, Abo-Taleb NSM. Assessment of the role of cone beam computed sialography in diagnosing salivary gland lesions. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43:17–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalk WWI, Vissink A, Spijkervet FKL, Bootsma H, Kallenberg CGM, Roodenburg JLN. Parotid sialography for diagnosing Sjogren syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94:131–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Becker M, Marchal F, Becker C, et al. Sialolithiasis and salivary ductal stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR sialography with a three-dimensional extended-phase conjugate-symmetry rapid spin-echo sequence. Radiology. 2000;216:347–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Astreinidou E, Roesink J, Raaijmakers CPJ, et al. 3D MR sialography as a tool to investigate radiation-induced xerostomia: feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:1310–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalinowski M, Heverhagen J, Rehberg E, et al. Comparative study of MR sialography and digital subtraction sialography for benign salivary gland disorders. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1485–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tanaka T, Ono K, Ansai T, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance sialography for patients with xerostomia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:115–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Habu M, Tanaka T, Tomoyose T, et al. Significance of dynamic magnetic resonance sialography in prognostic evaluation of saline solution irrigation of the parotid gland for the treatment of xerostomia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:768–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dental and Maxillofacial RadiologyGuy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.Dental RadiologyThe Eastman Dental Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK

Personalised recommendations