A One-Hour Curriculum to Engage Middle School Students in Robotics and Computer Science Using Cubelets

  • Nikolaus Correll
  • Chris Wailes
  • Scott Slaby
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 104)


Robotics has become a standard K-12 outreach tool and for attracting students to the STEM disciplines. Performing these activities in the class room usually requires substantial time commitment by the teacher and integration into the curriculum requires major effort, which makes spontaneous and short-term engagements difficult. This paper studies using “Cubelets”, a modular robotic construction kit, which requires virtually no setup time and allows substantial engagement and change of perception of STEM in as little as a 1-hour session. This paper describes the constructivist curriculum and provides qualitative and quantitative results on perception changes with respect to STEM and computer science in particular as a field of study.


Geiger Counter Substantial Engagement Automation Magazine Stem Discipline Reading Magazine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A modular and extendable robotics platform for education. In: 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2009, pp. 1–4 (October 2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brand, B., Collver, M., Kasarda, M.: Motivating students with robotics. In: The Science Teacher, pp. 44–49 (April/May 2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruder, S., Wedeward, K.: Robotics in the classroom. In: IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, pp. 25–29 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carbonaro, M., Rex, M., Chambers, J.: Using lego robotics in project-based learning environment. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning 6(1) (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goff, M., Vernon, M.: Using LEGO RCX bricks as the platform for interdisciplinary design projects. In: Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, number Session 3425 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Magnenat, S., Riedo, F., Bonani, M., Mondada, F.: A programming workshop using the robot “thymio ii”: The effect on the understanding by children. In: IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), pp. 24–29 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matson, E., DeLoach, S.: Using Robots to Increase Interest of Technical Disciplines in Rural and Underserved Schools, Salt Lake City, UT (June 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mondada, F., Bonani, M., Raemy, X., Pugh, J., Cianci, C., Klaptocz, A., Magnenat, S., Zufferey, J., Floriano, D., Martinoli, A.: The e-puck, a robot designed for education in engineering. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, vol. 1, pp. 59–65 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nourbaksh, I.: Robot diaries: Creative technology fluency for middle school girls. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 16–18 (March 2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petre, M., Price, B.: Using robotics to motivate ‘back door’ learning. Education and Information Technologies 9(2), 147–158 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pomalaza-Raez, C., Groff, B.: Retention 101: Where robots go ... students follow. Journal of Engineering Education 92(1), 85–90 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schweikardt, E.: Modular robotics as tools for design. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, Washington, DC, USA (June 2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schweikardt, E., Gross, M.: roBlocks: a robotic construction kit for mathematics and science education. In: ICMI 2006 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pp. 72–75 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schweikardt, E., Gross, M.: The robot is the program: interacting with roBlocks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Bonn, Germany (February 2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spencer, D., Jaksic, N.: A multidisciplinary robotics learning environment: what Mindstorms and DARPA urban challenge have in common. ASEE Computers in Education Journal 1(3), 32–39 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Welch, A.: The Effect of the FIRST Robotics Competition on High School Students’ Attitudes Toward Science. PhD thesis, University of Kansas. Curriculum and Teaching (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Angevine MiddleschoolLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations