Crafting a Systematic Literature Review on Open-Source Platforms

  • Jose Teixeira
  • Abayomi Baiyere
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 427)

Abstract

This working paper unveils the crafting of a systematic literature review on open-source platforms. The high-competitive mobile devices market, where several players such as Apple, Google, Nokia and Microsoft run a platforms- war with constant shifts in their technological strategies, is gaining increasing attention from scholars. It matters, then, to review previous literature on past platforms-wars, such as the ones from the PC and game-console industries, and assess its implications to the current mobile devices platforms-war. The paper starts by justifying the purpose and rationale behind this literature review on open-source platforms. The concepts of open-source software and computer-based platforms were then discussed both individually and in unison, in order to clarify the core-concept of “open-source platform” that guides this literature review. The detailed design of the employed methodological strategy is then presented as the central part of this paper. The paper concludes with preliminary findings organizing previous literature on open-source platforms for the purpose of guiding future research in this area.

Keywords

Open-source FLOSS Platforms Ecosystems R&D Management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Apple, “Apple | Open Source” (December 06, 2012), http://www.apple.com/opensource/ (accessed December 06, 2012)
  2. 2.
    Android, “Welcome to Android” (December 06, 2012), http://source.android.com/ (accessed December 06, 2012)
  3. 3.
    TheGuardian, “Nokia closes Symbian to the world” (November 29, 2010), http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology (accessed December 06, 2012)
  4. 4.
    Nokia “Nokia and Microsoft announce plans for a broad strategic partnership to build a new global ecosystem» Nokia – Press” (February 11, 2011), http://press.nokia.com/2011/02/11/ (accessed December 06, 2012)
  5. 5.
    HP Financial news, “HP Investor Relations” (December 06, 2012), http://h30261.www3.hp.com/ (accessed December 06, 2012)
  6. 6.
    Mian, S.Q., Teixeira, J., Koskivaara, E.: Open-Source Software Implications in the Competitive Mobile Platforms Market. In: Skersys, T., Butleris, R., Nemuraite, L., Suomi, R. (eds.) I3E 2011. IFIP AICT, vol. 353, pp. 110–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Dynamic structures of control and generativity in digital ecosystem service innovation: the cases of the Apple and Google mobile app stores. London School of Economics and Political Science (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Governing third-party development through platform boundary resources. In: ICIS Proceedings, pp. 1–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anvaari, M., Jansen, S.: Evaluating architectural openness in mobile software platforms. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume, pp. 85–92 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly 26, 13–23 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    von Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process, Verona, pp. 2206–2217 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stallman, R.: The GNU manifesto (1985)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Debian, “Debian Social Contract (version 1.1)” (1997), http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines (accessed March 29, 2011)
  14. 14.
    Dedrick, J., West, J.: An exploratory study into open source platform adoption. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 10 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perens, B.: The Open Source Definition. In: Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, 1st edn., p. 280. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferguson, C.H., Morris, C.R.: Computer Wars: How the West Can Win in a Post-IBM World. Times Books New York, NY (1993)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bresnahan, T.F., Greenstein, S.: Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics 47(1), 1–40 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    West, J.: How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy 32(7), 1259–1285 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: How companies become platform leaders. MIT/Sloan Management Review 49 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hagiu, A.: Japan’s High-Technology Computer-Based Industries: Software Platforms Anyone? RIETI Column (October 19, 2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teixeira, J.: Open-Source Technologies Realizing Social Networks: A Multiple Descriptive Case-Study. In: Hammouda, I., Lundell, B., Mikkonen, T., Scacchi, W. (eds.) OSS 2012. IFIP AICT, vol. 378, pp. 250–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krishnamurthy, S., Tripathi, A.K.: Monetary donations to an open source software platform. Research Policy 38(2), 404 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Järvinen, P.: On developing and evaluating of the literature review. In: The 31st Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Workshop 3 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Okoli, C., Schabram, K.: A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    von Brocke, J., Theresa, S.: Culture in Business Process Management: A Literature Review. Business Process Management Journal 17(2) (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press (1991)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chavis, D.M., Hogge, J.H., McMillan, D.W., Wandersman, A.: Sense of community through Brunswik’s lens: A first look. J. Community Psychol. 14(1), 24–40 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. Mis Quarterly 30(3), 611–642 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Economides, N., Katsamakas, E.: Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science 52(7), 1057–1071 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dedrick, J., West, J.: Why firms adopt open source platforms: a grounded theory of innovation and standards adoption. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Standard Making: A Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems, pp. 236–257 (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Basole, R.C.: Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. Journal of Information Technology 24(2), 144–159 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gartner, “Smartphone Sales Accounted for 55 Percent of Overall Mobile Phone Sales,” http://www.gartner.com/ (accessed November 21, 2013)
  33. 33.
    iPhone 5S vs. Galaxy S4 And The Rest: Your Guide To Buying The Right Smartphone, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/19/ (accessed November 21, 2013)

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jose Teixeira
    • 1
  • Abayomi Baiyere
    • 1
  1. 1.TUCS - Turku Centre for Computer ScienceUniversity of TurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations