Advertisement

#impressme: The Language of Motivation in User Generated Content

  • Marc T. Tomlinson
  • David B. Bracewell
  • Wayne Krug
  • David Hinote
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8404)

Abstract

An individual‘s ability to produce quality work is a function of their current motivation, their control over the results of their work, and the social influences of other individuals. All of these factors can be identified in the language that individuals use to discuss their work with their peers. Previous approaches to modeling motivation have relied on social-network and time-series analysis to predict the popularity of a contribution to user-generated content site. In contrast, we show how an individual’s use of language can reflect their level of motivation and can be used to predict their future performance. We compare our results to an analysis of motivation based on utility theory. We show that an understanding of the language contained in comments on user generated content sites provides significant insight into an author’s level of motivation and the potential quality of their future work.

Keywords

Community Member Language Model Prospect Theory Utility Model User Generate Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press (1969)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., Jurafsky, D.: Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In: Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP, vol. 2005 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bracewell, D.B., Tomlinson, M.: The Social Actions of Successful Groups. In: IEEE Sixth International Conference on Semantic Computing (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Core, M.G., Allen, J.F.: Coding Dialogs with the DAMSL Annotation Scheme. In: Traum, D. (ed.) AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, pp. 28–35. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stolcke, A., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Coccaro, N., Jurafsky, D., Martin, R., Meteer, M., Ries, K., Taylor, P., Ess-Dykema, C.V.: Dialog Act Modeling for Conversational Speech. In: Applying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing, pp. 98–105. AAAI Press (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bunt, H.: The semantics of dialogue acts. In: International Conference on Computational Semantics, pp. 1–13 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bender, E.M., Morgan, J.T., Oxley, M., Zachry, M., Hutchinson, B., Marin, A., Zhang, B., Ostendorf, M.: Annotating social acts: Authority claims and alignment moves in wikipedia talk pages. In: ACL HLT 2011, p. 48 (June 2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsu, C.-F., Khabiri, E., Caverlee, J.: Ranking Comments on the Social Web. In: 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, pp. 90–97 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khabiri, E., Hsu, C.F., Caverlee, J.: Analyzing and predicting community preference of socially generated metadata: A case study on comments in the digg community. In: AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cha, M., Mislove, A., Gummadi, K.P.: A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2009, p. 721 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Szabo, G., Huberman, B.A.: Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM 53(8), 80–88 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Kahneman & Tversky (1979) - Prospect Theory - An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.pdf. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heath, C., Larrick, R.P., Wu, G.: Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology 38(1), 79–109 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Albarracin, D., Hepler, J., Tannenbaum, M.: General Action and Inaction Goals: Their Behavioral, Cognitive, and Affective Origins and Influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(2), 119–123 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Locke, E.A.: Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 3(2) (1968)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Finkelstein, S.R., Fishbach, A.: Tell Me What I Did Wrong: Experts Seek and Respond to Negative Feedback. Journal of Consumer Research 39(1), 22–38 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ajzen, I.: The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fang, A., Bunt, H., Cao, J.: Collaborative Annotation of Dialogue Acts: Application of a New ISO Standard to the Switchboard Corpus. In: EACL 2012, pp. 61–68 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bracewell, D.B., Tomlinson, M.T., Brunson, M., Plymale, J., Bracewell, J., Boerger, D.: Annotation of Adversarial and Collegial Social Actions in Discourse. In: 6th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pp. 184–192 (July 2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davidov, D., Tsur, O., Rappaport, A.: Enhanced Sentiment Learning Using Twitter Hashtags and Smileys. In: Coling, pp. 241–249 (August 2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roberts, K., Roach, M., Johnson, J., Gurthrie, J., Harabagiu, S.M.: Empatweet: Annotating and detecting emotions on Twitter. In: Proceedings of LREC 2012, pp. 3806–3813 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petukhova, V., Bunt, H.: Incremental dialogue act understanding. In: IWCS 2011 Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Semantics, pp. 235–244 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SentiWordNet 3.0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. In: LREC, pp. 2200–2204 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc T. Tomlinson
    • 1
  • David B. Bracewell
    • 1
  • Wayne Krug
    • 1
  • David Hinote
    • 1
  1. 1.Language ComputerRichardsonUSA

Personalised recommendations