Advertisement

Constructive Collisions

  • Edward A. Lee
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8415)

Abstract

This paper studies the semantics of models for discrete physical phenomena such as rigid body collisions. The paper combines generalized functions (specifically the Dirac delta function), superdense time, modal models, and constructive semantics to get a rich, flexible, efficient, and rigorous approach to modeling such systems. It shows that many physical scenarios that have been problematic formodeling techniquesmanifest as nonconstructive models, and that constructive versions of some of the models properly reflect uncertainty in the behavior of the physical systems that plausibly arise from the principles of quantum mechanics. The paper argues that these modeling difficulties are not reasonably solved by more detailed continuous models of the underlying physical phenomena. Such more detailed models simply shift the uncertainty to other aspects of the model. Since such detailed models come with a high computational cost, there is little justification in using them unless the goal of modeling is specifically to understand these more detailed physical processes. An implementation of these methods in the Ptolemy II modeling and simulation environment is described.

Keywords

Operational Semantic Dirac Delta Function Modal Model Impulsive Force Discrete Subset 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Alur, R., Courcoubetis, C., Halbwachs, N., Henzinger, T., Ho, P.-H., Nicollin, X., Olivero, A., Sifakis, J., Yovine, S.: The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems. Theoretical Computer Science 138(1), 3–34 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beer Jr., F., Johnston, E.R.: Vector equations for Engineers: Dynamics, 6th edn. McGraw Hill (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benveniste, A., Berry, G.: The synchronous approach to reactive and real-time systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 79(9), 1270–1282 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benveniste, A., Bourke, T., Caillaud, B., Pouzet, M.: The fundamentals of hybrid systems modelers. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 78(3), 877–910 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berry, G.: The Constructive Semantics of Pure Esterel. Draft version, 3rd edn. (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cardoso, J., Lee, E.A., Liu, J., Zheng, H.: Continuous-time models. In: Ptolemaeus, C. (ed.) System Design, Modeling, and Simulation using Ptolemy II. Ptolemy.org, Berkeley (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chatterjee, A., Ruina, A.: A new algebraic rigid body collision law based on impulse space considerations. Journal of Applied Mechanics 65(4), 939–951 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davey, B.A., Priestly, H.A.: Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erleben, K., Sporring, J., Henriksen, K., Dohlmann, H.: Physics-Based Animation. Charles River Media, Inc., Hingham (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feng, T.H., Lee, E.A., Liu, X., Tripakis, S., Zheng, H., Zhou, Y.: Modal models. In: Ptolemaeus, C. (ed.) System Design, Modeling, and Simulation using Ptolemy II. Ptolemy.org, Berkeley (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glockner, C.: Scalar force potentials in rigid multibody systems. In: Pfeiffer, F., Glockner, C. (eds.) Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts. CISM Courses and Lectures, vol. 421. Springer, Vienna (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, E.A.: Modeling concurrent real-time processes using discrete events. Annals of Software Engineering 7, 25–45 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, E.A.: Constructive models of discrete and continuous physical phenomena. Technical report, EECS Department, UC Berkeley (February 2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, E.A., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.: A framework for comparing models of computation. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Circuits and Systems 17(12), 1217–1229 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, E.A., Tripakis, S.: Modal models in Ptolemy. In: 3rd Int. Workshop on Equation-Based Object-Oriented Modeling Languages and Tools (EOOLT), Oslo, Norway, vol. 47, pp. 11–21. Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping University (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, E.A., Varaiya, P.: Structure and Interpretation of Signals and Systems, 2.0 edn. LeeVaraiya.org (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, E.A., Zheng, H.: Operational semantics of hybrid systems. In: Morari, M., Thiele, L. (eds.) HSCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3414, pp. 25–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, E.A., Zheng, H.: Leveraging synchronous language principles for heterogeneous modeling and design of embedded systems. In: EMSOFT, Salzburg, Austria. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lindstrøm, T.: An invitation to nonstandard analysis. In: Cutland, N. (ed.) Nonstandard Analysis and Its Applications, pp. 1–105. Cambridge University Press (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maler, O., Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: From timed to hybrid systems. In: Huizing, C., de Bakker, J.W., Rozenberg, G., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) REX 1991. LNCS, vol. 600, pp. 447–484. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mosterman, P.J., Biswas, G.: A theory of discontinuities in physical system models. Journal of the Franklin Institute 335(3), 401–439 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mosterman, P.J., Simko, G., Zande, J.: A hyperdense semantic domain for discontinuous behavior in physical system models. In: Multi-Paradigm Modeling, MPM (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Otter, M., Elmqvist, H., López, J.D.: Collision handling for the Modelica multibody library. In: Modelica Conference, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 45–53 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ptolemaeus, C. (ed.): System Design, Modeling, and Simulation using Ptolemy II. Ptolemy.org, Berkeley (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stewart, D.E.: Rigid-body dynamics with friction and impact. SIAM Review 42(1), 3–39 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tiller, M.M.: Introduction to Physical Modeling with Modelica. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward A. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.EECS DepartmentUC BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations