A Logical Basis for Quantum Evolution and Entanglement

  • Richard F. Blute
  • Alessio Guglielmi
  • Ivan T. Ivanov
  • Prakash Panangaden
  • Lutz Straßburger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8222)


We reconsider discrete quantum causal dynamics where quantum systems are viewed as discrete structures, namely directed acyclic graphs. In such a graph, events are considered as vertices and edges depict propagation between events. Evolution is described as happening between a special family of spacelike slices, which were referred to as locative slices. Such slices are not so large as to result in acausal influences, but large enough to capture nonlocal correlations.

In our logical interpretation, edges are assigned logical formulas in a special logical system, called BV, an instance of a deep inference system. We demonstrate that BV, with its mix of commutative and noncommutative connectives, is precisely the right logic for such analysis. We show that the commutative tensor encodes (possible) entanglement, and the noncommutative seq encodes causal precedence. With this interpretation, the locative slices are precisely the derivable strings of formulas. Several new technical results about BV are developed as part of this analysis.


Density Matrix Monoidal Category Outgoing Edge Linear Logic Incoming Edge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Nielsen, M., Chuang, I.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abramsky, S., Coecke, B.: A categorical semantics of quantum protocols. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science 2004, pp. 415–425. IEEE Computer Society (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abramsky, S., Coecke, B.: Physics from computer science. International Journal of Unconventional Computing 3, 179–197 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lambek, J., Scott, P.: Introduction to Higher-order Categorical Logic. Cambridge Univ. Press (1986)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Girard, J.Y.: Linear logic: Its syntax and semantics. In: Girard, J.Y., Lafont, Y., Regnier, L. (eds.) Advances in Linear Logic. LMS Lecture Note Series, vol. 222, pp. 1–42. Cambridge University Press (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blute, R., Ivanov, I., Panangaden, P.: Discrete quantum causal dynamics. International Journal of Theoretical Phsysics 42, 2025–2041 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Markopoulou, F.: Quantum causal histories. Classical and Quantum Gravity 17, 2059–2077 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blute, R.F., Ivanov, I.T., Panangaden, P.: Discrete quantum causal dynamics (2001),
  9. 9.
    Guglielmi, A.: A system of interaction and structure. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 8(1), 1–64 (2007), Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guglielmi, A.: Deep inference,
  11. 11.
    Sorkin, R.: Spacetime and causal sets. In: D’Olivo, J., et al. (eds.) Relativity and Gravitation: Classical and Quantum. World Scientific (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Girard, J.Y., Lafont, Y., Taylor, P.: Proofs and Types. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press (1989)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szabo, M.: Polycategories. Communications in Algebra 3, 663–689 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blute, R., Cockett, J., Seely, R., Trimble, T.: Natural deduction and coherence for weakly distributive categories. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 113, 229–296 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brünnler, K.: Locality for classical logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47(4), 557–580 (2006), Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tiu, A.F.: A local system for intuitionistic logic. In: Hermann, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4246, pp. 242–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guenot, N.: Nested Deduction in Logical Foundations for Computation. Phd thesis, Ecole Polytechnique (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Straßburger, L.: A local system for linear logic. In: Baaz, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2514, pp. 388–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Straßburger, L.: MELL in the calculus of structures. Theoretical Computer Science 309, 213–285 (2003), Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brünnler, K.: Deep sequent systems for modal logic. In: Governatori, G., Hodkinson, I., Venema, Y. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 6, pp. 107–119. College Publications (2006),
  21. 21.
    Straßburger, L.: Cut elimination in nested sequents for intuitionistic modal logics. In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) FOSSACS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7794, pp. 209–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tiu, A.: A system of interaction and structure II: The need for deep inference. Logical Methods in Computer Science 2(2:4), 1–24 (2006), Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kahramanoğulları, O.: System BV is NP-complete. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 152(1-3), 107–121 (2007), Scholar
  24. 24.
    Straßburger, L.: Linear Logic and Noncommutativity in the Calculus of Structures. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Dresden (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Straßburger, L., Guglielmi, A.: A system of interaction and structure IV: The exponentials and decomposition. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 12(4), 23 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Blute, R.F., Panangaden, P., Slavnov, S.: Deep inference and probabilistic coherence spaces. Applied Categorical Structures 20, 209–228 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Girard, J.Y.: Between Logic and Quantic: A Tract. LMS Lecture Note Series, vol. 316, ch. 10, pp. 346–381. Cambridge University Press (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard F. Blute
    • 1
  • Alessio Guglielmi
    • 2
  • Ivan T. Ivanov
    • 3
  • Prakash Panangaden
    • 4
  • Lutz Straßburger
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of OttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BathUK
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsVanier CollegeCanada
  4. 4.School of Computer ScienceMcGill UniversityCanada
  5. 5.INRIA Saclay, École PolytechniqueFrance

Personalised recommendations