Analyzing the Impact of Satellite Clock-TGD Coupled Error on BDS Positioning Accuracy

  • Zhouzheng Gao
  • Hongping Zhang
  • Qile Zhao
  • Zhigang Hu
  • Wenbin Shen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 303)

Abstract

BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) has got the ability of real-time navigation and high accuracy positioning services for the Asian-Pacific regions by the end of 2012 with the constellation of 5GEOs + 5IGSOs + 4MEOs. Currently, although BDS can provide positioning service better than 10 m, there remains a problem that the positions calculated with B1 and B2 pseudo-range ionosphere-free combination (BC) are a little worse in accuracy than those obtained from B1 pseudo-range only. This phenomena can be partly explained with the observing errors (white noise and multi-path), and the accuracy of ionosphere model. Besides, the coupled error for BDS satellite clock-TGD would be another important factor. Here we analyze this coupled error and its effect on BDS real-time positioning based on BDS precise clock and BDS satellites DCB provided by GNSS Research Center (GRC), Wuhan University. 12 days’ BDS observations from BeiDou experimental tracking stations (BETS) have been processed and investigated with the precise products by GRC and broadcast ephemeris. Results indicate that the coupled error between BDS broadcast satellite clock and TGD of BC is 5.04 ns, which is about 3 times larger than that of B1 (1.79 ns). And it is a system bias that results BC positioning accuracy worse than that of B1. In additional, by analyzing BDS observations’ multi-path noise, it shows the multi-path noise is one of the facts leading to BDS BC positioning accuracy a litter worse than B1 positioning accuracy. We also find that the receiver noise is the main reason affecting BDS velocity accuracy.

Keywords

BDS real-time positioning BDS TGD Clock-TGD coupled errors 

References

  1. 1.
    Shi C, Zhao Q, Hu Z et al (2013) Precise relative positioning using real tracking data from COMPASS GEO and IGSO satellites. GPS Solutions 17(1):103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou S, Gao Y, Zhou J et al (2012) Positioning accuracy assessment for the 4GEO/5IGSO/2MEO constellation of COMPASS. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 55(22)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P et al (2012) Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-2 regional navigation satellite system. GPS Solutions 1–12Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang YX, Li JL, Wang AB et al (2013) Preliminary assessment of the navigation and positioning performance of BeiDou regional navigation satellite system. Sci China Earth Sci 1–9Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsakis D (2007) The timing group delay (TGD) correction and GPS timing biases. In: Proceeding of the 63rd annual meeting of the institute of navigation, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ruan R (2009) Study on GPS precise point positioning using un-differenced carrier phase. PLA Information Engineering UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xing N, Wu X, Hu X, et al. (2012) Secular changes in differential code bias of COMPASS system. In: China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2012 Proceedings Lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 160. pp 243–251Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang H, Gao Z, Ge M et al (2013) On the convergence of ionospheric constrained precise point positioning (IC-PPP) based on undifferential uncombined raw GNSS observations. Sensors 13:15708–15725. doi: 10.3390/s131115708u CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhouzheng Gao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hongping Zhang
    • 2
  • Qile Zhao
    • 2
  • Zhigang Hu
    • 2
  • Wenbin Shen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geodesy and GeomaticsWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.GNSS Research CenterWuhan UiversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations