Advertisement

Interaction of DNA Intramolecular Structures with Their Complementary Strands: A Thermodynamic Approach for the Control of Gene Expression

  • Irine Khutsishvili
  • Sarah E. Johnson
  • Calliste Reiling
  • Iztok Prislan
  • Hui-Ting Lee
  • Luis A. MarkyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the RNA Technologies book series (RNATECHN)

Abstract

The folding of mRNA sequences into secondary/tertiary structures plays an important role in RNA and DNA function and expression. Disruption of these structures can potentially be used in the control of gene expression. However, a detailed understanding of the physicochemical properties of nucleic acid structures is needed before this targeting approach can be used. In this chapter, we have examined six intramolecular DNA structures and have investigated their reaction thermodynamics with single strands partially complementary to their stems and loops. We measured the heat of each reaction directly using isothermal titration calorimetry. These are compared with the heat measured indirectly using Hess cycles obtained from differential scanning calorimetric unfolding thermodynamic profiles. Each reaction yielded favorable free energy terms that were enthalpy driven, indicating each complementary strand was able to disrupt the intramolecular complex. In short, we have developed a thermodynamic approach that can be used in the control of gene expression that targets the loops of secondary structures formed by mRNA.

Keywords

Targeting DNA secondary structures Antisense Heat Thermodynamics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant MCB-1122029 from the National Science Foundation and a GAANN graduate fellowship (C.R.) of Grant P200A120231 from the US Department of Education.

References

  1. Beal PA, Dervan PB (1991) Second structural motif for recognition of DNA by oligonucleotide-directed triple-helix formation. Science 251:1360–1363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bochman ML, Paeschke K, Zakian VA (2012) DNA secondary structures: stability and function of G-quadruplex structures. Nat Rev Genet 13:770–780PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bock LC, Griffin LC, Latham JA et al (1992) Selection of single-stranded DNA molecules that bind and inhibit human thrombin. Nature 355:564–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breslauer KJ, Frank R, Blocker H et al (1986) Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3746–3750PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown PM, Madden CA, Fox KR (1998) Triple-helix formation at different positions on nucleosomal DNA. Biochemistry 37:16139–16151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantor CR, Schimmel PR (1980) Biophysical chemistry. Part III: The behavior of biological macromolecules. W. H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantor CR, Warshaw MM, Shapiro H (1970) Oligonucleotide interactions. 3. Circular dichroism studies of the conformation of deoxyoligonucleotides. Biopolymers 9:1059–1077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crooke ST (1999) Molecular mechanisms of action of antisense drugs. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Struct Expr 1489:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darlow JM, Leach DRF (1998) Evidence for two preferred hairpin folding patterns in d(CGG)·d(CCG) repeat tracts in vivo. J Mol Biol 275:17–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Firulli AB, Maibenco DC, Kinniburgh AJ (1994) Triplex forming ability of a c-myc promoter element predicts promoter strength. Arch Biochem Biophys 310:236–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Folini M, Pennati M, Zaffaroni N (2002) Targeting human telomerase by antisense oligonucleotides and ribozymes. Curr Med Chem Anti-Cancer Agents 5:605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox KR (1990) Long (dA)n × (dT)n tracts can form intramolecular triplexes under superhelical stress. Nucleic Acid Res 18:5387–5391PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox KR (2000) Targeting DNA with triplexes. Curr Med Chem 7:17–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gasan AI, Maleev VY, Semenov MA (1990) Role of water in stabilizing the helical biomacromolecules DNA and collagen. Stud Biophys 136:171–178Google Scholar
  15. Gehring K, Leroy J-L, Gueron A (1993) A tetrameric, DNA structure with protonated cytosine · cytosine base pairs. Nature 363:561–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han H, Hurley LH (2000) A potencial target for anti-cancer drug design. Trends Pharmacol Sci 21:136–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helene C (1991) Rational design of sequence-specific oncogene inhibitors based on antisense and antigene oligonucleotides. Eur J Cancer 27:1466–1471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helene C (1994) Control of oncogene expression by antisense nucleic acids. Eur J Cancer 30A:1721–1726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huard S, Autexier C (2002) Targeting human telomerase in cancer therapy. Curr Med Chem Anti-Cancer Agents 2:577–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Juliano RL, Astriab-Fisher A, Falke D (2001) Macromolecular therapeutics: emerging strategies for drug discovery in the postgenome era. Mol Interv 1:40–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Koeppel F, Riou J-F, Laoui A et al (2001) Ethidium derivatives bind to G-quartets, inhibit telomerase and act as fluorescent probes for quadruplexes. Nucleic Acid Res 29:1087–1096PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee HT, Olsen CM, Waters L et al (2008) Thermodynamic contributions of the reactions of DNA intramolecular structures with their complementary strands. Biochimie 90:1052–1063PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee HT, Carr C, Siebler H et al (2011) A thermodynamic approach for the targeting of nucleic acid structures using their complementary single strands. Methods Enzymol 492:1–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahato RI, Cheng K, Guntaka RV (2005) Modulation of gene expression by antisense and antigene oligodeoxynucleotides and small interfering RNA. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2:3–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marky LA, Breslauer KJ (1987) Calculating thermodynamic data for transitions of any molecularity from equilibrium melting curves. Biopolymers 26:1601–1620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marky LA, Kupke DW (2000) Enthalpy-entropy compensations in nucleic acids: contribution of electrostriction and structural hydration. Methods Enzymol 323:419–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marky LA, Blumenfeld KS, Kozlowski S et al (1983) Salt-dependent conformational transitions in the self-complementary deoxydodecanucleotide d(CGCGAATTCGCG): evidence for hairpin formation. Biopolymers 22:1247–1257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marky LA, Rentzeperis D, Luneva NP et al (1996) Differential hydration thermodynamics of stereoisomeric DNA-benzo[a]pyrene adducts derived from diol epoxide enantiomers with different tumorigenic potentials. J Am Chem Soc 118:3804–3810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marky LA, Maiti S, Olsen CM et al (2007) Building blocks of nucleic acid nanostructures: unfolding thermodynamics of intramolecular DNA complexes. In: Labhasetwar V, Leslie-Pelecky D (eds) Biomedical applications of nanotechnology. Wiley, New York, pp 191–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mills M, Lacroix L, Arimondo PB et al (2002) Unusual DNA conformations: implications for telomeres. Curr Med Chem Anti-Cancer Agents 2:627–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rando RF, Ojwang J, Elbaggari A et al (1995) Suppression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 activity in vitro by oligonucleotides which form intramolecular tetrads. J Biol Chem 270:1754–1760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rentzeperis D, Kupke DW, Marky LA (1994) Differential hydration of dA.dT base pairs in parallel-stranded DNA relative to antiparallel DNA. Biochemistry 33:9588–9591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rich A (1993) DNA comes in many forms. Gene 135:99–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SantaLucia J Jr, Allawi HT, Seneviratne PA (1996) Improved nearest-neighbor parameters for predicting DNA duplex stability. Biochemistry 35:3555–3562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seeman NC, Kallenbach NR (1994) DNA branched junctions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 23:53–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simonsson T, Pecinka P, Kubista M (1998) DNA tetraplex formation in the control region of c-myc. Nucleic Acid Res 26:1167–1172PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vasquez KM, Dagle JM, Weeks DL et al (2001) Chromosome targeting at short polypurine sites by cationic triplex-forming oligonucleotides. J Biol Chem 276:38536–38541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang KY, Krawczyk SH, Bischofberger N et al (1993) The tertiary structure of a DNA aptamer which binds to and inhibits thrombin determines activity. Biochemistry 32:11285–11292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wiseman T, Williston S, Brandts JF et al (1989) Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter. Anal Biochem 179:131–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zahler AM, Williamson JR, Cech TR et al (1991) Inhibition of telomerase by G-quartet DNA structures. Nature 350:718–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhong M, Marky LA, Kallenbach NR et al (1997) Thermodynamics of dT–dT base pair mismatching in linear DNA duplexes and three-arm DNA junctions. Biochemistry 36:2485–2491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zieba K, Chu TM, Kupke DW et al (1991) Differential hydration of dA × dT base pairing and dA and dT bulges in deoxyoligonucleotides. Biochemistry 30:8018–8026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irine Khutsishvili
    • 1
  • Sarah E. Johnson
    • 1
  • Calliste Reiling
    • 1
  • Iztok Prislan
    • 1
  • Hui-Ting Lee
    • 1
  • Luis A. Marky
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of PharmacyUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations