EDB: Knowledge Technologies for Ancient Greek and Latin Epigraphy

  • Fabio Fumarola
  • Gianvito Pio
  • Antonio E. Felle
  • Donato Malerba
  • Michelangelo Ceci
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 385)


Classical Greek and Latin culture is the very foundation of the identity of modern Europe. Today, a variety of modern subjects and disciplines have their roots in the classical world: from philosophy to architecture, from geometry to law. However, only a small fraction of the total production of texts from ancient Greece and Rome has survived up to the present days, leaving many ample gaps in the historiographic records. Epigraphy, which is the study of inscriptions (epigraphs), aims at plug this gap. In particular, the goal of Epigraphy is to clarify the meanings of epigraphs, classifying their uses according to dates and cultural contexts, and drawing conclusions about the writing and the writers. Indeed, they are a kind of cultural heritage for which several research projects have recently been promoted for the purposes of preservation, storage, indexing and on-line usage. In this paper, we describe the system EDB (Epigraphic Database Bari) which stores about 30,000 Christian inscriptions of Rome, including those published in the Inscriptiones Christianae Vrbis Romae septimo saeculo antiquiores, nova series editions. EDB provides, in addition to the possibility of storing metadata, the possibility of i) supporting information retrieval through a thesaurus-based query engine, ii) supporting time-based analysis of epigraphs in order to detect and represent novelties, and iii) geo-referencing epigraphs by exploiting a spatial database.


Epigraphy Information Retrieval Knowledge Bases Novelty Detection Spatial Databases 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Agosti, M., Benfante, L., Orio, N.: A contribution for the dissemination of cultural heritage content to a wider public. In: Agosti, M., Esposito, F., Ferilli, S., Ferro, N. (eds.) IRCDL 2012. CCIS, vol. 354, pp. 195–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altamura, O., Berardi, M., Ceci, M., Malerba, D., Varlaro, A.: Using colour information to understand censorship cards of film archives. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition 9(2-4), 281–297 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Álvarez, F.-L., Gómez-Pantoja, J.-L., Barriocanal, E.G.: From relational databases to linked data in epigraphy: Hispania epigraphica online. In: Barriocanal, et al. (eds.) [5], pp. 225–233Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antonacopoulos, A., Karatzas, D.: Document image analysis for World War II personal records. In: 1st International Workshop on Document Image Analysis for Libraries (DIAL), pp. 336–341 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    García-Barriocanal, E., Cebeci, Z., Okur, M.C., Öztürk, A. (eds.): MTSR 2011. CCIS, vol. 240. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bodard, G.: The inscriptions of aphrodisias as electronic publication: A user’s perspective and a proposed paradigm. Digital Medievalist 4 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ceci, M., Berardi, M., Malerba, D.: Relational data mining and ilp for document image understanding. Applied Artificial Intelligence 21(4&5), 317–342 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feraudi-Gruénais, F.: Latin on Stone: Epigraphy and Databases. Lexington Book (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frommholz, I., Brocks, H., Thiel, U., Neuhold, E.J., Iannone, L., Semeraro, G., Berardi, M., Ceci, M.: Document-centered collaboration for scholars in the humanities – the COLLATE system. In: Koch, T., Sølvberg, I.T. (eds.) ECDL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2769, pp. 434–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gäde, M., Ferro, N., Paramita, M.L.: CHiC 2011 - Cultural Heritage in CLEF: From Use Cases to Evaluation in Practice for Multilingual Information Access to Cultural Heritage. In: Petras, V., Forner, P., Clough, P.D. (eds.) CLEF (Notebook Papers/Labs/Workshop) (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gatos, B., Ntzios, K., Pratikakis, I., Petridis, S., Konidaris, T., Perantonis, S.J.: A segmentation-free recognition technique to assist old greek handwritten manuscript OCR. In: Marinai, S., Dengel, A.R. (eds.) DAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3163, pp. 63–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gatos, B., Pratikakis, I., Perantonis, S.J.: An adaptive binarization technique for low quality historical documents. In: Marinai, S., Dengel, A.R. (eds.) DAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3163, pp. 102–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Le Bourgeois, F., Kaileh, H.: Automatic metadata retrieval from ancient manuscripts. In: Marinai, S., Dengel, A.R. (eds.) DAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3163, pp. 75–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richardson, L., Ruby, S.: RESTful web services. O’Reilly Media, Incorporated (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Fumarola
    • 1
  • Gianvito Pio
    • 1
  • Antonio E. Felle
    • 2
  • Donato Malerba
    • 1
  • Michelangelo Ceci
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità degli Studi di Bari “A. Moro”BariItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità e del Tardo AnticoUniversità degli Studi di Bari “A. Moro”BariItaly

Personalised recommendations