Semantic Lenses as Exploration Method for Scholarly Articles

  • Silvio Peroni
  • Francesca Tomasi
  • Fabio Vitali
  • Jacopo Zingoni
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 385)

Abstract

In a move towards an enrichment of the metadata models that are used in the electronic publication of scholarly literature, modern publishers are making steps towards semantic publishing. The possibility to explore a collection of scientific papers (a digital library, a repository or an archive of data) using different and multiple facets, i.e., different and multiple points of view on the digital collection, increases on the one hand the success of information retrieval and on the other hand the availability of richer data sets. Multiple facets are the natural navigation method made possible by an adequate ontological representation of a class of homogeneous documents. Context and content of published journal articles are thus components that in the representation of information at the metadata level constitute a fundamental approach to semantic enhancement. In this paper we introduced a test in using a particular semantic publishing model, called semantic lenses, to semantically enhance published journal articles.

Keywords

context and content document semantics semantic publishing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Peroni, S., Tomasi, F., Vitali, F.: Reflecting on the Europeana Data Model. In: Proceedings of the 8th Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries. Revised Selected Papers, pp. 228–240 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whalley, W.B., MacNeil, J., Munroe, G., Landy, S., Power, S.: Developing a flexible structure for a pure e-journal. In: Rowland, F., Meadows, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st ICCC/IFIP Conference on Electronic Publishing: New Models and Opportunities (1997), http://elpub.scix.net/data/works/att/97112.content.pdf
  3. 3.
    Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. DCMI Metadata Terms. DCMI Recommendation (June 14, 2012), http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/
  4. 4.
    Shotton, D., Portwin, K., Klyne, G., Miles, A.: Adventures in Semantic Publishing: Exemplar Semantic Enhancements of a Research Article. PLoS Computational Biology 5(4), e1000361 (2009), doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peroni, S., Shotton, D., Vitali, F.: Faceted documents: describing document characteristics using semantic lenses. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 191–194. ACM, New York (2012), doi:10.1145/2361354.2361396Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agosti, M., Berretti, S., Brettlecker, G., Del Bimbo, A., Ferro, N., Fuhr, N., Keim, D.A., Klas, C., Lidy, T., Milano, D., Norrie, M.C., Ranaldi, P., Rauber, A., Schek, H., Schreck, T., Schuldt, H., Signer, B., Springmann, M.: DelosDLMS - The Integrated DELOS Digital Library Management System. In: Proceedings of the 1st International DELOS Conference, pp. 36–45 (2007), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77088-6_4Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pettifer, S., McDermott, P., Marsh, J., Thorne, D., Villeger, A., Attwood, T.K.: Ceci nest pas un hamburger: modelling and representing the scholarly article. Learned Publishing 24, 207–220 (2011), doi:10.1087/20110309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Darcus, B., Giasson, F.: Bibliographic Ontology Specification. Specification Document (November 4, 2009), http://bibliontology.com/specification
  9. 9.
    IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Final Report (1998), http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr_current_toc.htm
  10. 10.
    Groza, T., Möller, K., Handschuh, S., Trif, D., Decker, S.: SALT: Weaving the claim web. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ISWC/ASWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 197–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toulmin, S.: The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1959)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneider, J., Groza, T., Passant, A.: A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web. Semantic Web -Interoperability, Usability, Applicability (2012), Pre-press available at: http://iospress.metapress.com/content/016x47v66347462v/fulltext.pdf (last visited July 25, 2012) (in press)
  13. 13.
    Lauritsen, M., Gordon, T.F.: Toward a general theory of document modeling. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 202–211 (2009), doi:10.1145/1568234.1568257Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koutsomitropoulos, D.A., Solomou, G.D., Alexopoulos, A.D., Papatheodorou, T.S.: Semantic Web enabled digital repositories. International Journal on Digital Libraries 10, 179–199 (2009), doi:10.1007/s00799-010-0059-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ranganathan, S.R.: Theory of Library Catalogue. Madras Library Association, Chennai (1938)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quintarelli, E.: Folksonomies: power to the people. Presented at the ISKO Italy-UniMIB meeting (2005), http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folksonomies.htm
  17. 17.
    Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., McGuinness, D.: PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. W3C Working Draft (03 May 2012). World Wide Web Consortium (2012), http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o
  18. 18.
    Lee, C.A.: A framework for contextual information in digital collections. Journal of Documentation 67(1), 95–143 (2011), doi:10.1108/00220411111105470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mazzini, S., Ricci, F.: EAC-CPF Ontology and Linked Archival Data. In: Semantic Digital Archives. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives (2011), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-801/
  20. 20.
    International Council on Archives: ISAAR(CPF): International Standard Archival Authority Record for Corporate Bodies, 2nd edn. (2003), http://www.icacds.org.uk/eng/ISAARCPF2ed.pdf
  21. 21.
    Pitti, D.: Creator Description: Encoded Archival Context. In: Taylor, A.G., Tillett, B.B., Baca, M., Guerrini, M. (eds.) Authority Control in Organizing and Accessing Information: Definition and International Experience, pp. 201–226. Haworth Information Press, Binghamton (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peroni, S., Shotton, D., Vitali, F.: Scholarly publishing and the Linked Data: describing roles, statuses, temporal and contextual extents. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2012), doi:10.1145/2362499.2362502Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peroni, S., Shotton, D.: FaBiO and CiTO: ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web (2012), doi:10.1016/j.websem.2012.08.001Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Text Encoding Initiative Consortium: TEI P5: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange (2005), http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/P5
  25. 25.
    Ore, C.E., Eide, O.: TEI and cultural heritage ontologies: Exchange of information? Literary and Linguistic Computing 24(2), 161–172 (2009), doi:10.1093/ll-c/fqp010Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Di Iorio, A., Peroni, S., Vitali, F.: A Semantic Web Approach To Everyday Overlapping Markup. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(9), 1696–1716 (2011), doi:10.1002/asi.21591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peroni, S., Gangemi, A., Vitali, F.: Dealing with Markup Semantics. In: Proceedings the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems, pp. 111–118. ACM, New York (2011), doi:10.1145/2063518.2063533Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Di Iorio, A., Peroni, S., Poggi, F., Vitali, F.: A first approach to the automatic recognition of structural patterns in XML documents. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 85–94. ACM, New York (2012), doi:10.1145/2361354.2361374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bizer, C., Lehmann, J., Kobilarov, G., Auer, S., Becker, C., Cyganiak, R., Hellmann, S.: DBpedia – A Crystallization Point for the Web of Data. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 7(3), 154–165 (2009), doi:10.1016/j.websem.2009.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fuhr, N., Tsakonas, G., Aalberg, T., Agosti, M., Hansen, P., Kapidakis, S., Klas, C., Kovacs, L., Landoni, M., Micsik, A., Papatheodorou, C., Peters, C., Solvberg, I.: Evaluation of digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries 8(1), 21–28 (2007), doi:10.1007/s00799-007-0011-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvio Peroni
    • 1
  • Francesca Tomasi
    • 2
  • Fabio Vitali
    • 1
  • Jacopo Zingoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of BolognaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Classical Philology and Italian StudiesUniversity of BolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations