Multi-modal Pipeline for Comprehensive Validation of Mitral Valve Geometry and Functional Computational Models

  • Dominik Neumann
  • Sasa Grbic
  • Tommaso Mansi
  • Ingmar Voigt
  • Jean-Pierre Rabbah
  • Andrew W. Siefert
  • Neelakantan Saikrishnan
  • Ajit P. Yoganathan
  • David D. Yuh
  • Razvan Ioan Ionasec
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8330)

Abstract

Valvular heart disease affects a high number of patients, exhibiting significant mortality and morbidity rates. Mitral Valve (MV) Regurgitation, a disorder in which the MV does not close properly during systole, is among its most common forms. Traditionally, it has been treated with MV replacement. However, recently there is an increased interest in MV repair procedures, providing better long-term survival, better preservation of heart function, lower risk of complications, and usually eliminating the need for long-term use of blood thinners (anticoagulants). These procedures are complex and require an experienced surgeon and elaborate pre-operative planning. Hence, there is a need for efficient tools for training and planning of MV repair interventions. Computational models of valve function have been developed for these purposes. Nevertheless, state-of-the-art models remain approximations of real anatomy with considerable simplifications, since current modalities are limited by image quality. Hence, there is an important need to validate such low-fidelity models against comprehensive ex-vivo data to assess their clinical applicability. As a first step towards this aim, we propose an integrated pipeline for the validation of MV geometry and function models estimated in ex-vivo TEE data with respect to ex-vivo microCT data. We utilize a controlled experimental setup for ex-vivo imaging and employ robust machine learning and optimization techniques to extract reproducible geometrical models from both modalities. Using one exemplary case, we demonstrate the validity of our framework.

Keywords

Mitral Valve Papillary Muscle Mitral Annulus Leaflet Length Comprehensive Validation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kilic, A., Shah, A., Conte, J., Baumgartner, W., Yuh, D.: Operative outcomes in mitral valve surgery: Combined effect of surgeon and hospital volume in a population-based analysis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bolling, S., Li, S., O’Brien, S., Brennan, M., Prager, R., Gammie, J.: Predictors of mitral valve repair: Clinical and surgeon factors. Ann. of Thorac. Surg. 90, 1904–1912 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, Q., Sun, W.: Finite element modeling of mitral valve dynamic deformation using patient-specific multi-slices computed tomography scans. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41(1), 142–153 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stevanella, M., Maffessanti, F., Conti, C., Votta, E., Arnoldi, A., Lombardi, M., Parodi, O., Caiani, E., Redaelli, A.: Mitral valve patient-specific finite element modeling from cardiac mri: Application to an annuloplasty procedure. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology 2(2), 66–76 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ionasec, R., Voigt, I., Georgescu, B., Wang, Y., Houle, H., Vega-Higuera, F., Nassir, N., Comaniciu, D.: Patient-specific modeling and quantification of the aortic and mitral valves from 4-D cardiac CT and tee. TMI 29(9), 1636–1651 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mansi, T., Voigt, I., Georgescu, B., Zheng, X., Assoumou Mengue, E., Hackl, M., Ionasec, R.T., Seeburger, J., Comaniciu, D.: An integrated framework for fnite-element modeling of mitral valve biomechanics from medical images: Application to mitralclip intervention planning. Med. Image Anal. 16(7), 1330–1346 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siefert, A.W., Rabbah, J.P.M., Koomalsingh, K.J., Touchton Jr., S.A., Saikrishnan, N., McGarvey, J.R., Gorman, R.C., Gorman III, J.H., Yoganathan, A.P.: In vitro mitral valve simulator mimics systolic valvular function of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation ovine model. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 95, 825–830 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rabbah, J.P., Saikrishnan, N., Yoganathan, A.P.: A novel left heart simulator for the multi-modality characterization of native mitral valve geometry and fluid mechanics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31, 305–315 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jimenez, J.H., Soerensen, D.D., He, Z., He, S., Yoganathan, A.P.: Effects of a saddle shaped annulus on mitral valve function and chordal force distribution: an in vitro study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31(10), 1171–1181 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, S.S., Donoho, D.L., Saunders, M.A.: Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM 43(1), 129–159 (2001)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Breitenreicher, D., Schnoerr, C.: Model-based multiple rigid object detection and registration in unstructured range data. International Journal of Computer Vision 92(1), 1573–1405 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Danielsson, P.: Euclidean distance mapping. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 14(3), 227–248 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Voigt, I., Mansi, T., Ionasec, R.I., Mengue, E.A., Houle, H., Georgescu, B., Hornegger, J., Comaniciu, D.: Robust physically-constrained modeling of the mitral valve and subvalvular apparatus. In: Fichtinger, G., Martel, A., Peters, T. (eds.) MICCAI 2011, Part III. LNCS, vol. 6893, pp. 504–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krishnamurthy, G., Itoh, A., Bothe, W., Swanson, J., Kuhl, E., Karlsson, M., Craig Miller, D., Ingels, N.: Stress–strain behavior of mitral valve leaflets in the beating ovine heart. J. Biomech. 42(12), 1909–1916 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominik Neumann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sasa Grbic
    • 1
    • 3
  • Tommaso Mansi
    • 1
  • Ingmar Voigt
    • 1
  • Jean-Pierre Rabbah
    • 4
  • Andrew W. Siefert
    • 4
  • Neelakantan Saikrishnan
    • 4
  • Ajit P. Yoganathan
    • 4
  • David D. Yuh
    • 5
  • Razvan Ioan Ionasec
    • 1
  1. 1.Imaging and Computer VisionSiemens Corporate TechnologyPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Pattern Recognition LabUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergGermany
  3. 3.Computer Aided Medical ProceduresTechnical University MunichGermany
  4. 4.The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of Technology and Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of SurgeryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations