Probabilistic Automata for Safety LTL Specifications
Automata constructions for logical properties play an important role in the formal analysis of the system both statically and dynamically. In this paper, we present constructions of finite-state probabilistic monitors (FPM) for safety properties expressed in LTL. FPMs are probabilistic automata on infinite words that have a special, absorbing reject state, and given a cut-point λ ∈ [0,1], accept all words whose probability of reaching the reject state is at most 1 − λ. We consider Safe-LTL, the collection of LTL formulas built using conjunction, disjunction, next, and release operators, and show that (a) for any formula ϕ, there is an FPM with cut-point 1 of exponential size that recognizes the models of ϕ, and (b) there is a family of Safe-LTL formulas, such that the smallest FPM with cut-point 0 for this family is of doubly exponential size. Next, we consider the fragment LTL(G) of Safe-LTL wherein always operator is used instead of release operator and show that for any formula ϕ ∈ LTL(G) (c) there is an FPM with cut-point 0 of exponential size for ϕ, and (d) there is a robust FPM of exponential size for ϕ, where a robust FPM is one in which the acceptance probability of any word is bounded away from the cut-point. We also show that these constructions are optimal.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Chadha, R., Sistla, A.P., Viswanathan, M.: On the expressiveness and complexity of randomization in finite state monitors. J. ACM 56(5), 26:1–26:44 (2009)Google Scholar
- 2.Baier, C., Gröβer, M.: Recognizing ω-regular languages with probabilistic automata. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 137–146 (2005)Google Scholar
- 4.Paz, A.: Introduction to Probabilistic Automata. Academic Press (1971)Google Scholar
- 6.Sistla, A.P.: Safety, liveness and fairness in temporal logic. Formal Aspect of Computing, 495–511 (1999)Google Scholar
- 8.Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Temporal verification of reactive and concurrent systems: Specification. Springer (1992)Google Scholar
- 10.Yao, A.: Some complexity questions related to distributed computing. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computation, pp. 209–213 (1979)Google Scholar
- 11.Kushilevtiz, E., Nisan, N.: Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press (1996)Google Scholar
- 12.Kremer, I., Nisan, N., Ron, D.: On randomized one-round communication complexity. In: Symposium on Theory of Computing (June 1995)Google Scholar