Advertisement

Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) for Radiology

  • A. W. Templeton
  • S. J. DwyerIII
  • G. G. Cox
  • J. A. Johnson
  • W. H. Anderson
  • L. T. Cook
Conference paper

Abstract

The requirements for implementing a radiology imaging network are described. Desirable features of such a network include: the ability to acquire approximately one gigabyte of digitally formatted data per day; data transmission rates of over 2 megabits per second; high resolution display systems with matrix sizes of at least 1280 x 1024 x 12 bits and screen display time of one-half second; archiving capacity for a data base totaling one terabyte; rapid generation of hard copy images upon demand; and compatability of the radiologic imaging network with the hospital information management system.

Keywords

Display Screen Interactive Device Contrast Range Analog Film Raster Graphic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fischer HW. Radiology Departments: Planning, Operation, and Management. Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers, Inc., 1982.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Templeton AW, Dwyer III S.J, Rosenthal SJ, et al. A peripheralized digital image management system: prospectus. AJR 1982;139:979–984.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Capp MP. Radiological imaging — 2000 A.D. Radiology 1981;138:541–550.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dwyer III SJ, Templeton AW, Martin NL, et al. The cost of managing digital diagnostic images. Radiology 1982;144:313–318.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nudelman S, Fisher III HD, Frost MM, et al. A study of photoelectronic-digital radiology. Part I: The photoelectronic-digital radiology department. Proc IEEE 1982;70:700–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nudelman S, Helay J, Capp MP. A study of photoelectronic-digital radiology. Part II: Cost analysis of a photoelectronic-digital versus film-based system for radiology. Proc IEEE 1982;70:708–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nudelman S, Roehrig H, Capp MP. A study of photoelectronic-digital radiology. Part III: Image acguisition components and system design. Proc IEEE 1982;70:715–727.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duerinckx AJ, ed. Proceedings: 1st international conference and workshop on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) for medical applications. SPIE 1982:318.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dwyer III SJ, ed. Proceedings: 2nd international conference and workshop on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) for medical applications. SPIE 1983:418.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Templeton W, Dwyer III SJ, Johnson JA, et al. Implementation of an on-line and long-term digital management system. Radio Graphics 1985: 5:121–138.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Newman WM, Sproull RF. Principles of interactive computer graphics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sherr S. Electronic displays. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luxenberg HR, Kuehn RL, eds. Display systems engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1968.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Booth KS, ed. Tutorial: Computer graphics. Long Beach: IEEE Computer Society, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freeman H, ed. Tutorial and selected readings in interactive computer graphics. Long Beach: IEEE Computer Society, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Newman WM, Van Dam A. Recent efforts toward graphics standardization. ACM Computing Surveys 1978;10:365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Michener JC, Van Dam A. A functional overview of the core system with glossary. ACM Computing Surveys 1978;10:381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bergeron RD, Bono PR, Foley JD. Graphics programming using the core system. ACM Computing Surveys 1978;10:389–444.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Michener JC, Foley JD. Some major issues in the design of the core graphics system. ACM Computing Surveys 1978;10:445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Templeton AW, Johnson JA, Anderson WH, et al. Computer graphics for digitally formatted images. Radiology 1984;151:527–528.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Srihari SN. Representation of three-dimensional digital images. ACM Computing Surveys 1981;13:399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Batnitzky S, Price HI, Cook PN, et al. Three-dimensional computer reconstruction from surface contours of head CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1981;5:60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Batnitzky S, Price HI, Lee KR, et al. Three-dimensional computer reconstructions of brain lesions from surface contours provided by computed tomography: a prospectus. Neurosurgery 1982;11:73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gonzalez RC, Wintz P. Digital image processing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1977.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harlow CA, Dwyer III S3, Lodwick G. On radiographic image analysis. Digital Picture Analysis, A. Rosenfeld (editor). Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976, pp. 67–150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. W. Templeton
    • 1
  • S. J. DwyerIII
    • 1
  • G. G. Cox
    • 1
  • J. A. Johnson
    • 1
  • W. H. Anderson
    • 1
  • L. T. Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyThe University of Kansas College of Health Sciences and HospitalKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations