Epididymis und Ductus deferens

  • C. E. Hedinger
  • G. Dhom
Chapter
Part of the Spezielle pathologische Anatomie book series (SPEZIELLE, volume 21)

Zusammenfassung

Epididymis und Ductus deferens stehen anatomisch und funktionell in enger Verbindung mit dem Hoden. Das gilt nicht nur für die Normalverhältnisse, sondern auch für die Entwicklungsstörungen und Erkrankungen von Nebenhoden und Ductus deferens. Kombinierte, Hoden und Nebenhoden betreffende krankhafte Prozesse sowie die Nebenhodentumoren sind deshalb z. T. bereits in den vorstehenden Kapiteln über die Hodenpathologie behandelt worden. In den hier an—schließenden Ausführungen über pathologische Veränderungen an Epididymis und Ductus deferens beschränke ich mich auf kurze Zusammenfassungen oder auf Störungen, die in den vorstehenden Kapiteln kaum oder gar nicht erwähnt worden sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Anderson JC, Payne RA, Jighe J (1960) Unilateral renal hypoplasia with vestigial epididymal tubules. Br J Urol 32:273–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson R, Hofer P-A (1974) Genitourinary disturbances in familial and sporadic cases of primary amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Acta Med Scand 195:49–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayano Y, Omori K, Ogata J, Ikegami K (1982) Retroperitonel epididymal structures in adult male. Eur Urol 8:52–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgarten HG, Holstein AF, Rosengren E (1971) Arrangement, ultrastructure, and adrenergic innervation of smooth musculature of the ductuli efferentes, ductus epididy—midis and ductus deferens of man. Z Zellforsch 120:37–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamin JA, Robertson TD, Cheetham JG (1943) Vasitis nodosa: a new clinical entity simulating tuberculosis of the vas deferens. J Urol 49:575–582Google Scholar
  6. Bumpers PM, Hulbert WC, Jimenez JF (1989) Arteriovenous malformation of the spermatic cord. J Urol 141:103–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cicchino FE, Yates TM, Chappell BS (1951) Vestigial epididymal structures in unilateral renal aplasia. J Urol 66:667–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Civantos F, Lubin J, Rywlin AM (1972) Vasitis nodosa. Arch Pathol 94:355–361Google Scholar
  9. Culver GJ, Tannenhaus J (1960) Calcification of the vas deferens in diabetes. JAMA 173: 648–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denning CR, Sommers SC, Quigley HJ (1968) Infertility in male patients with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics 41:7–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Engelmann UH, Schramek P, Tomamichel G, Deindl F, Senge Th (1990) Vasectomy reversal in central Europe: results of a questionnaire of urologists in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. J Urol 143:64–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Feigelson J, Pecau Y (1986) Anomalies du sperme, des déférents et de l’épididyme dans la mucoviscidose. Presse Méd 15:523–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fingerhut A, Lesaget F, Pourchet J, Ronat R, Champault G, Patel JC (1982) Les lésions traumatiques des bourses. J Chir (Paris) 119:479–484Google Scholar
  14. Fisch H, Laor E, BarChama N, Witkin SS, Tolia BM, Reid RE (1989) Detection of testicular endocrine abnormalities and their correlation with serum antisperm antibodies in men following vasectomy. J Urol 141:1129–1132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Frick J (1983) Famihenplanung. In: Hohenfellner R, Zingg EJ (Hrsg) Urologie in Klinik und Praxis, Bd 2. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, S 1169–1175Google Scholar
  16. Gill B, Kogan S, Starr S, Reda E, Levitt S (1989) Significance of epididymal and ductal anomalies associated with testicular maldescent. J Urol 142:556–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldman RL, Azzopardi JG (1982) Benign neural invasion in vasitis nodosa. Histopathology 6: 309–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldstein M, Schlossberg S (1988) Men with congenital absence of the vas deferens often have seminal vesicles. J Urol 140:85–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gupta AS, Kothari LK, Dhruva A, Bapna R (1975) Surgical sterilization by vasectomy and its effect on the structure and function of the testis in man. Br J Surg 62:59–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hadziselimovic F (1982) Pathogenesis and treatment of undescended testes. Eur J Pediatr 139:255–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hadziselimovic F (1983) Cryptorchidism, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hallan RI, May ARL (1988) Vasectomy: How much is enough?. Br J Urol 62:377–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Handelsman DJ, Yue DK, Turtle JR (1983) Hypogonadism and massive testicular infiltration due to amyloidosis. J Urol 129:610–612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Holsclaw DS, Perlmutter AD, Jockin H, Shwachman H (1971) Genital abnormalities in male patients with cystic fibrosis. J Urol 106:568–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Holstein AF (1969) Morphologische Studien am Nebenhoden des Menschen. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  26. Holstein AF (1985) Die männlichen Geschlechtsorgane. In: Fleischhauer K, StaubesandGoogle Scholar
  27. J, Zenker W (Hrsg) Makroskopische und Mikroskopische Anatomie des Menschen. 2. Bd Kreislauf und Eingeweide, ed 14. Urban&Schwarzenberg, München Wien Baltimore, S 460–514Google Scholar
  28. Ishii T, Hosoda Y, Ikegami N, Shimadali (1983) Senileamyloiddeposition. J patholl 39:l-22Google Scholar
  29. Jarow JP, Budin RE, Dym M, Zirkin BR, Noren S, Marshall FF (1985) Quantitative pathologie changes in the human testis after vasectomy. N Engl J Med 313:1252–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaplan E, Shwachman H, Perlmutter AD, Rule A, Khaw K-T, Holsclaw DS (1968) Reproductive failure in males with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 279:65–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kretser de DM, Temple-Smith PD, Kerr JB (1982) Anatomical and functional aspects of the male reproductive organs. In: Bandhauer K, Bartsch G, Kretser de DM, Eshkol A, Frick J, Glezerman M, Kerr JB, Lunenfeld B, Pöldinger W, Rohr HP, Scharfetter F, Temple-Smith PD (eds) Disturbances in male fertiliy. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York,pp 1–131Google Scholar
  32. Küpeh S, Safak M, Yaman S (1989) Vas deferens calculus. J Urol 141:378Google Scholar
  33. Landing BH, Wells TR, Wang C-I (1969) Abnormality of the epididymis and vas deferens in cystic fibrosis. Arch Pathol 88:569–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Leader AJ, Axelrad SD, Frankowski R, Mumford SD (1974) Complications of 2,711 vasectomies. J Urol 111: 365–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall FF, Shermeta DW (1979) Epididymal abnormalities associated with undescended testis. J Urol 121:341–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Michelson L (1949) Congenital anomalies of the ductus deferens and epididymis. J Urol 61: 384–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mininberg DT (1987) The epididymis and testicular descent. Eur J Pediatr 146, Suppl. 2:28–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicolaij D, Vogel-Kerebyn C, Van Den Bergh R, Steeno OP (1979) Bilateral epididymal cysts as the first clinical manifestation of von Hippel-Lindau-disease. A case report. Andrologia 3:234–235Google Scholar
  39. Nistal M, Santamaria L, Codesal J, Paniagua R (1989) Secondary amyloidosis of the testis: an electron microscopic and histochemical study. Appl Pathol 7:2–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Oberndorfer S (1931) Die inneren männlichen Geschlechtsorgane. In: Henke F, Lubarsch O (Hrsg) Handbuch der speziellen Pathologischen Anatomie und Histologie, Bd 6, 3. Teil, Männliche Geschlechtsorgane. Springer, Berlin. S 427–865Google Scholar
  41. Petitti DB, Klein R, Kipp H, Friedman GD (1983) Vasectomy and the incidence of hospitalized illness. J Urol 129:760–762PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Priesel A (1924) lieber das Verhalten von Hoden und Nebenhoden bei angeborenem Fehlen des Ductus deferens, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frage des Vorkommens von Zwischenzellen im menschhchen Nebenhoden. Virchows Arch [A] 249:246–304Google Scholar
  43. Priesel A (1931) Die Missbildungen der männhchen Geschlechtsorgane. In: Henke F, Lubarsch O (Hrsg) Handbuch der speziellen pathologischen Anatomie und Histologie. Bd 6, 3. Teil, Männliche Geschlechtsorgane. Springer, Berlin S 1–182Google Scholar
  44. Pugh RCB, Hanley GH (1969) Spontaneous recanalisation of the divided vas deferens. Br J Urol 41:340–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sant’Agnese PA, Davis P (1979) Cystic fibrosis in adults. Am J Med 66:121–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stern RC, Boat TF, Doershuk CF, Tucker AS, Miller RB, Matthews LW (1977) Cystic fibrosis diagnosed after age 13. Twenty-five teenage and adult patients including three asymptomatic men. Ann Intern Med 87:188–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Stern RC, Boat TF, Doershuk CF (1982) Obstructive azoospermia as a diagnostis criterion for the cystic fibrosis syndrome. Lancet 1:1401–1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stieve H (1930) Männhche Genitalorgane. In: Möllendorf, W. v. (Hrsg) Handbuch der mikroskopischen Anatomie des Menschen. Bd 7,2. Teil. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  49. Taussig LM, Lobeck CC, Sant’Agnese PA, Ackerman DR, Kattwinkel J (1972) Fertility in males with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 287:586–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taxy JB (1978) Vasitis nodosa. Arch Pathol Lab Med 102:643–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tripathi VNP, Desautels RE (1969) Primary amyloidosis of the urogenital system: a study of 16 cases and brief review. J Urol 102:96–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wegelin C (1921) Ueber Spermiophagie im menschlichen Hoden. Beitr. Pathol 69:281–294Google Scholar
  53. Whitehead ED, Leiter E (1981) Genital abnormahties and abnormal semen analyses in male patients exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero. J Urol 125:47–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zimmerman KG, Johnson PC, Paplanus SH (1983) Nerve invasion by benign proliferating ductules in vasitis nodosa. Cancer 51:2066–2069PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. E. Hedinger
    • 1
  • G. Dhom
    • 2
  1. 1.Institutes für PathologieUniversität ZürichZürichSchweiz
  2. 2.Universität des Saarlandes, HomburgHomburg/SaarBundesrepublik Deutschland

Personalised recommendations