Coupled Processes in Electrolyte Solutions

  • Pierre Turq
  • Josef M. G. Barthel
  • Marius Chemla
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Chemistry book series (LNC, volume 57)

Abstract

There are various ways to treat irreversible thermodynamic processes in which electrolyte solutions exhibit coupled transport processes and chemical reactions. The phenomenological procedure chosen here is that of irreversible thermodynamics relating the flows to the underlying gradients. Strongly coupled relaxation processes evading the description by a set of one-particle equations will not be considered, such as the relaxation effect of electric migration and self-diffusion. The following treatment is based on sets of two-particle equations justified from first principles of statistical mechanics.

Keywords

Electrolyte Solution Couple Diffusion Laplace Transformation Normal Mode Analysis Mutual Diffusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H. G. Hertz, Electrochemistry, A Reformation of the Basic Principles, Lecture Notes in Chemistry, Vol.’ 17, Springer, Berlin 1980Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine, Self Organization in Non Equilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structure to Order through Fluctuations, Wiley, New York 1977.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. Ebeling, Strukturbildung bei irreversiblen Prozessen: Eine Einführung in die Theorie dissipativer Strukturen, Teubner, Leipzig 1976.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    B. J. Berne and R. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering with Applica-tion to Chemistry, Biology and Physics, Wiley, New York 1976.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Mills and H. D. Ellerton, J. Phys. Chem. 70 (1966) 4089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Plonka, Nukleonika, 9 (1964) 487.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Turq, M. Chemla and Y. Roumegous, J. Chim. Phys. Phys. Chim. Biol. 4 (1972) 681.Google Scholar
  8. P. Turq, M. Chemla, H. Latrous and J. M’Halla, J. Phys. Chem. 81 (1977) 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Turq, J. M’Halla, and M. Chemla, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 83 (1979) 982.Google Scholar
  10. P. Turq, L. Orcil, J. Chevalet, M. Chemla and R. Mills; J. Phys. Chem. 87 (1983) 4008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [8]
    S. Liukkonen, P. Passiniemi, Z. Noszticzius and J. Rastas, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 72 (1976) 2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [9]
    R. Mills, A. Perera, J. P. Simonin, L. Orcil and P. Turq, J. Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 2722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [10]
    J. P. Simonin, P. Tivant, P. Turq and E. Soulhalia, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Turq
    • 1
  • Josef M. G. Barthel
    • 2
  • Marius Chemla
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’ElectrochimieUniversitè Pierre et Marie CurieParisFrance
  2. 2.Institute of Physical and Theoretical ChemistryUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations