Genetic control of reproductive cell differentiation in Volvox

  • David L. Kirk
Part of the Experimental Phycology book series (PHYCOLOGY, volume 1)

Abstract

It is 100 years since August Weismann (1889) first suggested that Volvox might be the ideal organism in which to study the differentiation of germ and soma. But it was not until Richard Starr described the life history of V. carteri forma nagariensis (Fig. 1) exactly 80 years later (Starr, 1969) that material suitable for genetic analysis of germ-soma differentiation in Volvox became available to biologists1. Within a year of his description of normal development in this organism, Starr demonstrated its developmental-genetic potential by describing a number of Mendelian mutations that caused modified patterns of reproductive and/or somatic cell development (Starr, 1970). Huskey and his associates made substantial advances in the isolation and study of such mutants (e.g., Sessoms and Huskey, 1973; Huskey and Griffin, 1979, Callahan and Huskey, 1980), and succeeded in placing them on a preliminary map of the Volvox genome (Huskey et al, 1979). Currently, we are attempting to extend the pioneering studies of Starr and Huskey by saturating the genome with mutations that cause a breakdown of the germ-soma dichotomy, in hopes of eventually defining all of the major loci whose actions are required to establish the complete division of labor between somatic and reproductive cells that characterizes this species.

Keywords

Reproductive Cell Somatic Cell Reproductive Potential Asymmetric Division Reproductive Cell Differentiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baran G (1984) Analysis of somatic cell differentiation in Volvox carteri f. nagariensis. PhD. thesis, University of Virginia, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  2. Callahan AM, Huskey RJ (1980) Genetic control of sexual development in Volvox. Develop Biol 80: 419–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Darden WH (1966) Sexual differentiation in Volvox aureus. J Protozool 13: 239–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Green KJ, Kirk DL (1981) Cleavage patterns, cell lineages, and development of a cytoplasmic bridge system in Vo/vox embryos. J Cell Biol 91: 743–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Green KJ, Kirk DL (1982) A revision of the cell lineages recently reported for Volvox carteri embryos. J Cell Biol 94: 741–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harper JF, Huson KS, Kirk DL (1987) Use of repetitive sequences to identify DNA polymorphisms linked to regA, a developmentally important locus in Volvox. Genes & Develop 1: 573–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huskey RJ, Griffin BE (1979) Genetic control of somatic cell differentiation in Volvox: analysis of somatic regenerator mutants. Develop Biol 72: 226–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huskey RJ, Griffin BE, Cecil PO, Callahan AM (1979) A preliminary genetic investigation of Volvox carteri. Genet 91: 229–244Google Scholar
  9. Kirk DL (1988) The ontogeny and phylogeny of cellular differetniation in Volvox. Trends Genet 4: 32–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kirk DL, Birchem R, King N (1986) The extracellular matrix of Volvox: a comparative study and proposed system of nomenclature. J Cell Sci 80: 207–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirk DL, Harper JF (1986) Genetic, biochemical and molecular approaches to Volvox development and evolution. Int Rev Cytol 99: 217–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirk MM, Kirk DL (1985) Translational regulation of protein synthesis, in response to light, at a critical stage of Volvox development. Cell 41: 419–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirk DL, Kirk MM (1986) Heat shock elicits production of sexual inducer in Volvox. Science 231: 51–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirk DL, Baran GJ, Harper JF, Huskey RJ, Huson KS, Zagris N (1987) Stage-specific hypermutability of the regA locus of Volvox, a gene regualting the germ-soma dichotomy. Cell 48: 11–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kochert G (1967) Differentiation of reproductive cells in Volvox carteri. J Protozool 15: 438–452Google Scholar
  16. Kochert G (1975) Colony differentiation in green algae. In: Coward SJ (ed) Developmental regulation: aspects of cell differentiation. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Mages H-W, Tschochner H, Sumper M (1988) The sexual inducer of Volvox carteri: primary structure deduced from cDNA sequence. FEBS Lett 234: 407–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pall ML (1975) Mutants of Volvox showing premature cessation of division: evidence for a relationship between cell size and reproductive cell differentiation. In: McMahon D, Fox CF (eds) Developmental biology: pattern formation, gene regulation. Benjamin, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  19. Pommerville JC, Kochert GD (1981) Changes in somatic cell structure during senescence of Volvox carteri. Eur J Cell Biol 24: 236–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pommerville J, Kochert G (1982) Effects of senescence on somatic cell physiology in the green alga Volvox carteri. Exp Cell Res 140: 39–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sessoms AH, Huskey RJ (1973) Genetic control of development in Volvox: isolation and characterization of morphogenetic mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 1335–1338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Starr RC (1969) Structure, reproduction and differentiation in Volvox carteri f. nagariensis Iyengar, strains HK 9 and 10. Arch Protistenkd 111: 204–222Google Scholar
  23. Starr RC (1970) Control of differentiation in Volvox. Dev Biol (suppl) 4: 59–100Google Scholar
  24. Starr RC, Jaenicke L (1974) Purification and characterization of the hormone initiating sexual morphogenesis in Volvox carteri f. Nagariensis Iyengar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71: 1050–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Viamontes GI, Fochtmann L I, Kirk DL (1979) Morphogenesis in Volvox: analysis of critical variables. Cell 17: 537–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vig BK, Lewis R (1978) Genetic toxicology of bleomycin. Mutation Res 55: 12 1145Google Scholar
  27. Weismann A (1889) The continuity of the germ plasm as a foundation of a theory of heredity. In: Poulton EB, Schonland S, Shipley AE (eds) Essays upon heredity and kindred biological problems. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeig J, Hilmen M, Simon M (1978) Regulation of gene expression by sitespecific inversion. Cell 15: 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Kirk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyWashington UniversitySaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations