Cluster Simulation of Lattice Gases

  • H. W. J. Blöte
  • J. R. Heringa
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 83)

Abstract

Hard-core lattice gases can be simulated by means of cluster Monte Carlo algorithms. In particular we formulate a single-cluster algorithm for lattice gases with nearest neighbour-exclusion, in the absence of further neighbor interactions. In analogy with cluster algorithms for spin systems, this method quite efficiently suppresses critical slowing down. We use this method to derive statistically accurate finite-size data for lattice gases with nearest-neighbor exclusion on the simple-cubic and body-centered-cubic lattices. A finite-size-scaling analysis of these data indicates that these models belong to the Ising universality class. This result contradicts earlier analyses; we explain this disagreement in terms of corrections to scaling, which are quite prominent in these models.

Keywords

Ising Model Symmetry Operation Spin Variable Spin Configuration Bond Configuration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H.W.J. Blöte, E. Luijten and J.R. Heringa, J. Phys. A 28, 6289 (1995).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Yamagata, Physica A 222, 119 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Yamagata, Physica A 231, 495 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R.H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 86 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    U. Wolff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 361 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Dress and W. Krauth, J. Phys. A 28, L597 (1995).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.R. Heringa and H.W.J. Blöte, Physica A 232, 369 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.R. Heringa and H.W.J. Blöte, submitted Physica A (1997).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.G. Edwards and A.D. Sokal, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2009 (1989).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    P.W. Kasteleyn and CM. Fortuin, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Suppl. 26, 11 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1002 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.R. Heringa and H.W.J. Blöte, Phys. Rev. E 49, 1827 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. Binder, Z. Phys. B 43, 119 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A.L. Talapov and H.W.J. Blöte, J. Phys. A 29, 5727 (1996).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. W. J. Blöte
    • 1
  • J. R. Heringa
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Applied PhysicsDelft University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations