How Segregated Are People’s Names in London?

  • Pablo Mateos
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

This final chapter illustrates an example of the potential applications of the Onomap classification developed in this book. It consists in a detailed geographical application of the at the small area scale, particularly in ethnicity profiling of neighbourhoods. The chapter introduces the context of measuring ethnicity in London’s diverse population, justifying the analysis of residential segregation using people’s names. Traditional dimensions and indicators of residential segregation, drawn from the sociological and geographical literature, are implemented comparing both the Census of Population with the name-based approach. Results are discussed identifying key findings and research challenges; in particular the implications of scale effects and the overall complex population dynamics of London.

Keywords

Spatial Unit Residential Segregation Output Area Electoral Register Modifiable Areal Unit Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amin A (2002) Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity. Environ Plann A 34(6):959–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L, Regents of the University of Illinois (2004) GeoDa Analysis Software (version 0.9.5-i). University of Illinois. Available at https://www.geoda.uiuc.edu/. Accessed 31 Mar 2007
  4. Apparicio P, Petkevitch V, Charron M (2008) Segregation Analyzer: a C#.Net application for calculating residential segregation indices. Cybergeo 414Google Scholar
  5. Bell W (1954) A probability model for the measurement of ecological segregation. Soc Forces 32(4):357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brimicombe A (2007) Ethnicity, religion and residential segregation in London: evidence from a computational typology of minority communities. Environ Plann B 34(5):884–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown LA, Chung S-Y (2006) Spatial segregation, segregation indices and the geographical perspective. Popul Space Place 12(2):125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connolly H, Gardener D (2005) Who are the ‘Other’ ethnic groups? Social and Welfare reports. Office for National Satistics, London. Available at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/nojournal/other_ethnicgroups.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2006
  9. Duncan OD, Duncan B (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. Am Sociol Rev 20(2):210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fotheringham SA, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2000) Quantitative geography. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Geary RC (1954) The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. Incorporated Statistician 5:115–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodchild MF (1986) Spatial autocorrelation. CATMOG 47. Geo Books, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnston R, Forrest J, Poulsen M (2002) Are there ethnic enclaves/ghettos in English cities? Urban Stud 39:591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnston R, Voas D, Poulsen M (2003) Measuring spatial concentration: the use of threshold profiles. Environ Plann B 30(1):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lieberson S (1981) An asymmetrical approach to segregation. In: Peach C, Robinson V, Smith S (eds) Ethnic segregation in cities. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA, pp 61–82Google Scholar
  16. Longley P (2003) Geographical information systems: developments in socio-economic data infrastructures. Prog Hum Geogr 27(1):114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Massey DS, Denton NA (1988) The dimensions of residential segregation. Soc Forces 67:281–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mateos P (2007) An ontology of ethnicity based upon personal names. Implications for neighbourhood profiling. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Geography, University College London, London. Available at http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/16145/
  19. Mateos P (2011) Uncertain segregation: the challenge of defining and measuring ethnicity in segregation studies. Built Environ 37(2):226–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mateos P (2013) London’s population. In: Bell S, Paskings J (eds) Imagining the future city: London 2062. Ubiquity press/University College London, London, pp 7–21, http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bag.a
  21. Office for National Statistics (2006) National Statistics Postcode Directory (NSPD) user guide. Office for National Statistics, London. Available at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/downloads/NSPDUserGuide.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2006
  22. Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Books, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  23. Owen D (2006) Spatial analysis of segregation in the UK. Presented at royal geographic society with institute of British geographers annual conference, London, 30 Aug 2006Google Scholar
  24. Peach C (1996) Does Britain have ghettos? Trans Inst Br Geogr 21:216–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peach C (1998) South Asian and Caribbean ethnic minority housing choice in Britain. Urban Stud 35(10):1657–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peach C (1999) London and New York: contrasts in British and American models of segregation with a comment by Nathan Glazer. Int J Popul Geogr 5(5):319–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peach C (2006) Islam, ethnicity and South Asian religions in the London 2001 census. Trans Inst Br Geogr 31(3):353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peach C, Owen D (2004) Social geography of British South Asian Muslim, Sikh and Hindu sub-communities. ESRC End of Project Full Report R-000239765. Available at http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/ (search for “R-000239765”). Accessed 15 Aug 2006
  29. Peach C, Robinson V, Smith S (1981) Ethnic segregation in cities. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  30. Phillips D (1998) Black minority ethnic concentration, segregation and dispersal in Britain. Urban Stud 35(10):1681–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shevky E, Williams M (1949) The social areas of Los Angeles, analysis and typology. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simpson L (2004) Statistics of racial segregation: measures, evidence and policy. Urban Stud 41:661–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simpson L (2005) Measuring residential segregation. Presented at census: present and future. ESRC/JISC Census Programme, Leicester, 16 Nov 2005. Available at http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/research/migseg.htm. Accessed 24 Apr 2006
  35. Simpson L (2007) Ghettos of the mind: the empirical behaviour of indices of segregation and diversity. J R Stat Soc A Stat Soc 170(2):405–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thiel H, Finezza AJ (1971) A note on the measurement of racial integration of schools by means of informational concepts. J Math Sociol 1:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Voas D, Williamson P (2000) The scale of dissimilarity: concepts, measurement and an application to socio-economic variation across England and Wales. Trans Inst Br Geogr 25(4):465–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wong DWS (2003) Spatial decomposition of segregation indices: a framework toward measuring segregation at multiple levels. Geogr Anal 35(3):179–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wong DWS (2004) Comparing traditional and spatial segregation measures: a spatial scale perspective. Urban Geogr 25(1):66–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Mateos
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Research and Advanced Studies in Social AnthropologyCIESASGuadalajaraMexico
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations