A Portable and Efficient Implementation of Coinductive Logic Programming

  • Paulo Moura
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7752)

Abstract

We describe the portable and efficient implementation of coinductive logic programming found in Logtalk, discussing its features and limitations. As Logtalk uses as a back-end compiler a compatible Prolog system, we also discuss the status of key Prolog features for an efficient and usable implementation of coinduction.

Keywords

logic programming coinduction objects implementation portability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Saeedloei, N., Gupta, G.: A logic-based modeling and verification of CPS. SIGBED Rev. 8, 31–34 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saeedloei, N.: Modeling and Verification of Real-Time and Cyber-Physical Systems. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta, G., Bansal, A., Min, R., Simon, L., Mallya, A.: Coinductive Logic Programming and Its Applications. In: Dahl, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) ICLP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4670, pp. 27–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gupta, G., Saeedloei, N., DeVries, B., Min, R., Marple, K., Kluźniak, F.: Infinite Computation, Co-induction and Computational Logic. In: Corradini, A., Klin, B., Cîrstea, C. (eds.) CALCO 2011. LNCS, vol. 6859, pp. 40–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simon, L.: Coinductive Logic Programming. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moura, P.: From Plain Prolog to Logtalk Objects: Effective Code Encapsulation and Reuse (Invited Talk). In: Hill, P.M., Warren, D.S. (eds.) ICLP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5649, pp. 23–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moura, P.: Logtalk - Design of an Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Beira Interior, Portugal (September 2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kluźniak, F.: Metainterpreter supporting tabling (DRA) and coinduction with applications to LTL model checking, http://www.utdallas.edu/~gupta/meta.html
  9. 9.
    Ancona, D.: Regular corecursion in Prolog. In: Ossowski, S., Lecca, P. (eds.) SAC, pp. 1897–1902. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO/IEC: International Standard ISO/IEC 13211-1 Information Technology — Programming Languages — Prolog — Part I: General core, Corrigenda 2. ISO/IEC (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saeedloei, N., Gupta, G.: Coinductive Constraint Logic Programming. In: Schrijvers, T., Thiemann, P. (eds.) FLOPS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7294, pp. 243–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saeedloei, N., Gupta, G.: Verifying complex continuous real-time systems with coinductive CLP(R). In: Dediu, A.-H., Fernau, H., Martín-Vide, C. (eds.) LATA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6031, pp. 536–548. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paulo Moura
    • 1
  1. 1.CRACSINESC TEC (formerly INESC Porto)Portugal

Personalised recommendations