Common Sense Knowledge Based Personality Recognition from Text
Conference paper
Abstract
Past works on personality detection has shown that psycho-linguistic features, frequency based analysis at lexical level, emotive words and other lexical clues such as number of first person or second person words carry major role to identify personality associated with the text. In this work, we propose a new architecture for the same task using common sense knowledge with associated sentiment polarity and affective labels. To extract the common sense knowledge with sentiment polarity scores and affective labels we used Senticnet which is one of the most useful resources for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In particular, we combined common sense knowledge based features with phycho-linguistic features and frequency based features and later the features were employed in supervised classifiers. We designed five SMO based supervised classifiers for five personality traits. We observe that the use of common sense knowledge with affective and sentiment information enhances the accuracy of the existing frameworks which use only psycho-linguistic features and frequency based analysis at lexical level.
Keywords
personality detection common sense knowledge affective and sentiment informationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Cambria, E., Havasi, C., Hussain, A.: SenticNet 2: A semantic and affective resource for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of FLAIRS, Marco Island, pp. 202–207 (2012)Google Scholar
- 2.Havasi, C., Speer, R., Alonso, J.: ConceptNet 3: A Flexible, Multilingual Semantic Network for Common Sense Knowledge. In: RANLP (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Das, D., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Enhanced SenticNet with Affective Labels for Concept-based Opinion Mining. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(2), 31–38 (2013), doi:10.1109/MIS.2013.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Havasi, C., Speer, R., Pustejovsky, J.: Automatically Suggesting Semantic Structure for a Generative Lexicon Ontology. In: Generative Lexicon (2009)Google Scholar
- 5.Lapponi, E., Read, J., Ovrelid, L.: Representing and resolving negation for sentiment analysis. In: ICDM SENTIRE, Brussels, pp. 687–692 (2012)Google Scholar
- 6.Cambria, E., Hussain, A.: Sentic Computing: Techniques, Tools, and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cambria, E., Speer, R., Havasi, C., Hussain, A.: SenticNet: A publicly available semantic resource for opinion mining. In: AAAI CSK, Arlington, pp. 14–18 (2010)Google Scholar
- 8.Alghamdi, A., Aldabbas, H., Alshehri, M., Nusir, M.: Adopting User-Centered Development Approach For Arabic E-Commerce Websites. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, IJWesT (2012)Google Scholar
- 9.Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Vinitzky, G.: Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1289–1295 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Boden, M., Mellor, D.H.: What Is Computational Psychology? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 58, 37–53 (1984)Google Scholar
- 11.Briggs Myers, I., McCaulley, M.H., Quenk, N., Hammer, A.: MBTI Handbook: A Guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press (1998)Google Scholar
- 12.Cattell, H.E.P., Mead, A.D.: The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF): SAGE Knowledge. In: The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment (2008), http://people.wku.edu/richard.miller/520%2016PF%20Cattell%20and%20Mead.pdf (retrieved May 27, 2013)
- 13.Celli, F.: Unsupervised Personality Recognition for Social Network Sites. In: The Sixth International Conference on Digital Society, ICDS 2012 (c), pp. 59–62 (2012)Google Scholar
- 14.Coltheart, M.: The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33A(4), 497–505 (1981)Google Scholar
- 15.Eysenck, H.J., Eysenck, S.B.: Manual for the EPQ-R. EdITS, San Diego (1991)Google Scholar
- 16.Golbeck, J., Robles, C., Turner, K.: Predicting personality with social media. In: CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 253–262 (2011)Google Scholar
- 17.Wilson, M.: MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine Usable Dictionary, Version 2.00 (1987), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.52.6928 (retrieved)
- 18.Isaacson, K., Peacey, S.: Human resources and social media (2012)Google Scholar
- 19.John, O.P., Naumann, L.P., Soto, C.J.: Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In: Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, pp. 114–158 (2008)Google Scholar
- 20.Mairesse, F., Walker, M.A., Mehl, M.R., Moore, R.K.: Using Linguistic Cues for the Automatic Recognition of Personality in Conversation and Text. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 30(1), 457–500 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 21.Matthews, G., Deary, I.J., Whiteman, M.C.: Personality Traits, Cambridge, UK, pp. 23–26 (2009)Google Scholar
- 22.Noecker, J., Ryan, M., Juola, P.: Psychological profiling through textual analysis. Literary and Linguistic Computing (2013)Google Scholar
- 23.Oberlander, J., Nowson, S.: Whose thumb is it anyway? Classifying author personality from weblog text. Computational Linguistics, 627–634 (2006)Google Scholar
- 24.Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1), 24–54 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Tomlinson, M.T., Hinote, D., Bracewell, D.B.: Predicting Conscientiousness through Semantic Analysis of Facebook Posts. In: Proceedings of WCPR 2013, Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition at ICWSM 2013 (7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media) (2013)Google Scholar
- 26.Mohammad, S.M., Kiritchenko, S.: Using Nuances of Emotion to Identify Personality (2012)Google Scholar
- 27.Sidorov, G., Castro-Sánchez, N.A.: Automatic emotional personality description using linguistic data. Research in Computing Science 20, 89–94 (2006)Google Scholar
- 28.Sidorov, G., Castro-Sánchez, N.A.: System for linguistically-based evaluation of psychological profiles. In: Dialogue 2006, Russia, pp. 464–467 (2006)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013