Advertisement

The Governance of Business Processes

  • M. Lynne MarkusEmail author
  • Dax D. Jacobson
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks on Information Systems book series (INFOSYS)

Abstract

Good business process governance is necessary for the success of business processes, which in turn are essential for business success. The term business process governance refers to the direction, coordination, and control of individuals, groups, or organizations that are at least to some extent autonomous, meaning that hierarchical authority alone is not sufficient to ensure effective performance. Business process governance, whether within or across organizational entities comprises a variety of mechanisms, including organizational structures (roles and units for performing and coordinating process activities), allocations of decision making authority, and procedures (e.g., review and approval processes). Governance mechanisms may be formal (i.e., formalized in writing or in law) or informal (e.g., not mandated). All governance mechanisms have pros and cons; some mechanisms are more effective (but also more costly) than others. The challenge is to design a cost-effective governance regime, which usually consists of designing several less costly mechanisms to work in combination. This chapter describes various governance mechanisms, identifies their advantages and disadvantages, and provides examples that show how governance mechanisms can contribute to improved business process performance.

Keywords

Business Process Emergency Medication Service Governance Mechanism Service Level Agreement Business Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under award number SES-0964909.

References

  1. Becker J, Kugeler M, Rosemann M (2003) Process management: a guide for the design of business processes. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis TR (2005) Integrating shared services with the strategy and operations of MNEs. J Gen Manag 31(2):1–17Google Scholar
  3. Galbraith JR (1994) Competing with flexible lateral organizations, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  4. Grant G, McKnight S, Uruthirapathy A, Brown A (2007) Designing governance for shared services organizations in the public service. Gov Inf Q 24(3):522–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horan TA, Schooley BL (2007) Time-critical information services. Commun ACM 50(3):73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hvalshagen M (2004) Transforming the IT organization for the State of Virginia. Inf Syst Manag 21(4):52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kettinger WJ, Grover V (1995) Special section: toward a theory of business process change management. J Manag Inf Syst 12(1):9–30Google Scholar
  8. Lynn J, Laurence E, Heinrich CJ, Hill CJ (2001) Improving governance: a new logic for empirical research. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Markus ML, Bui GN (2012) Going concerns: governance of interorganizational coordination hubs. J Manag Inf Syst 28(4):163–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Markus ML, Sia SK, Soh C (2012) MNEs and information management: structuring and governing IT resources in the global enterprise. J Glob Inf Manag 20(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosemann M, de Bruin T (2005) Towards a business process management maturity model. In: 13th European conference on information systems, RegensburgGoogle Scholar
  13. Schooley BL, Horan TA (2007) Towards end-to-end government performance management: case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (EMS). Gov Inf Q 24:755–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tomasino A, Fedorowicz J, Williams CB (2012) Embracing system complexity: lessons learned from Winnebago County’s shared service center collaboration. Bentley University working paper, WalthamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information and Process Management Department at Bentley UniversityWalthamUSA
  2. 2.California State University Channel Islands MVS School of Business & EconomicsCamarilloUSA

Personalised recommendations