Advertisement

Process Management for Knowledge Work

  • Thomas H. Davenport
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks on Information Systems book series (INFOSYS)

Abstract

In this chapter, the topic of using process improvement approaches to improve knowledge work is addressed. The effective performance of knowledge work is critical to contemporary sophisticated economies. It is suggested that traditional, engineering-based approaches to knowledge work are incompatible with the autonomy and work approaches of many knowledge workers. Therefore, a variety of alternative process-oriented approaches to knowledge work are described. Emphasis is placed on differentiating among different types of knowledge work and applying process interventions that are more behaviorally sensitive.

Keywords

Knowledge Management Knowledge Creation Knowledge Work Process Orientation Agile Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adler PS, McGarry FE, Talbot WB, Binney DJ (2003) Enabling process discipline: lessons from Computer Sciences Corporation on Capability Maturity Model Level 5, working paper, University of Southern California, May 26, 2003Google Scholar
  2. Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organisation Science 2:40–57Google Scholar
  3. Brown JS, Duguid P (2000) The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Conger S (2014) Six sigma and business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 127–146Google Scholar
  5. Crissis MB, Conrad M, Shrum S (2003) CMMI: guidelines for process integration and product improvement. Reading, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Manage Sci 50(3):352–364Google Scholar
  7. Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a living: how to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. Harvard Business School Publishing, BostonGoogle Scholar
  8. Davenport TH, Beck JC (2002) The attention economy. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Davenport TH, Glaser J (2002) Just in time delivery comes to knowledge management. Harvard Business Review 80:107–111Google Scholar
  10. Davenport TH, Iyer B (2009) Should you outsource your brain? Harv Bus Rev, Feb 2009Google Scholar
  11. Davenport TH, Jarvenpaa SL, Beers MC (1996) Improving knowledge work processes. In: Sloan Management Review, pp 53–65Google Scholar
  12. Davenport TH, Thomas RI, Desouza KC (2003) Reusing intellectual assets. Industrial Management, 45(3):12–18Google Scholar
  13. Drucker PF (1968) The age of discontinuity. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Gery G (1991) Electronic performance support systems. Ziff Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall JM, Johnson ME (2009) When should a process be art, not science? Harv Bus Rev, March 2009Google Scholar
  16. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al. (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hindo B (2007) At 3M, a struggle between efficiency and creativity. Bus Week. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_24/b4038406.htm
  18. Holmes MF, Campbell Jr. RB (2003) Product Development processes: three vectors of improvement. MIT Center for Innovation in Product Development working paper. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3819
  19. Kemsley S (2014) Business process management and the social enterprise. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 463–474Google Scholar
  20. Quinn JB (1992) Intelligent enterprise: a knowledge and service-based paradigm for industry. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Software Engineering Institute (1995) The capability maturity model: guidelines for improving the software process. Reading, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Swidey (2004) The Revolutionary, The Boston Globe, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/reprints/010404_the_revolutionary/, Mai 1, 2010
  23. Wikipedia (2009) Positive deviance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Deviance. Accessed 22 Feb 2009

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Babson CollegeWellesleyUSA

Personalised recommendations