Business Process Simulation Survival Guide

Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks on Information Systems book series (INFOSYS)

Abstract

Simulation provides a flexible approach to analyzing business processes. Through simulation experiments various “what if” questions can be answered and redesign alternatives can be compared with respect to key performance indicators. This chapter introduces simulation as an analysis tool for business process management. After describing the characteristics of business simulation models, the phases of a simulation project, the generation of random variables, and the analysis of simulation results, we discuss 15 risks, i.e., potential pitfalls jeopardizing the correctness and value of business process simulation. For example, the behavior of resources is often modeled in a rather naïve manner resulting in unreliable simulation models. Whereas traditional simulation approaches rely on hand-made models, we advocate the use of process mining techniques for creating more reliable simulation models based on real event data. Moreover, simulation can be turned into a powerful tool for operational decision making by using real-time process data.

References

  1. Ajmone Marsan M, Balbo G, Conte G, Donatelli S, Franceschinis G (1995) Modelling with generalized stochastic Petri nets, Wiley series in parallel computing. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Altiok T, Melamed B (2007) Simulation modeling and analysis with Arena. Elsevier Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. Baskett F, Chandy KM, Muntz RR, Palacios FG (1975) Open, closed and mixed networks of queues with different classes of customers. J Assoc Comput Mach 22(2):248–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bratley P, Fox BL, Schrage LE (1983) A guide to simulation. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buzacott JA (1996) Commonalities in reengineered business processes: Models and issues. Manage Sci 42(5):768–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahl OJ, Nygaard K (1966) SIMULA: an ALGOL based simulation language. Commun ACM 1:671–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dumas M, La Rosa M, Mendling J, Reijers H (2013) Fundamentals of business process management. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haas PJ (2002) Stochastic Petri nets: modelling, stability, simulation, Springer series in operations research. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartmann AK (2009) Practical guide to computer simulations. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huff D (1954) How to lie with statistics. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose JP, van der Aalst WMP, Zliobaite I, Pechenizkiy M (2011) Handling concept drift in process mining. In: Mouratidis H, Rolland C (eds) International conference on advanced information systems engineering (Caise 2011). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6741. Springer, Berlin, pp 391–405Google Scholar
  12. Kelton DW, Sadowski R, Sturrock D (2003) Simulation with Arena. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleijnen J, van Groenendaal W (1992) Simulation: a statistical perspective. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleinrock L (1975) Queueing systems, vol 1, Theory. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Law AM, Kelton DW (1982) Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Nakatumba J, van der Aalst WMP (2010) Analyzing resource behavior using process mining. In: Rinderle-Ma S, Sadiq S, Leymann F (eds) BPM 2009 workshops, Proceedings of the fifth workshop on Business Process Intelligence (BPI’09). Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 43. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–80Google Scholar
  17. Naylor TH, Balintfy JL, Burdick DS, Kong Chu (1966) Computer simulation techniques. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Pidd M (1989) Computer modelling for discrete simulation. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Ripley B (2006) Stochastic simulation. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson S (1994) Successful simulation: a practical approach to simulation projects. McGraw-Hill, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosemann M, vom Brocke J (2014) The six core elements of business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 105–122Google Scholar
  22. Rosemann M, Recker J, Flender C (2008) Contextualisation of business processes. Int J Bus Process Integr Manage 3(1):47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ross SM (1990) A course in simulation. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Rozinat A, Mans RS, Song M, van der Aalst WMP (2009a) Discovering simulation models. Inform Syst 34(3):305–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rozinat A, Wynn M, van der Aalst WMP, ter Hofstede AHM, Fidge C (2009b) Workflow simulation for operational decision support. Data Knowl Eng 68(9):834–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Russell N, van der Aalst WMP, ter Hofstede AHM, Edmond D (2005) Workflow resource patterns: identification, representation and tool support. In: Pastor O, Falcao e Cunha J (eds) Proceedings of the 17th conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE’05), Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3520. Springer, Berlin, pp 216–232Google Scholar
  27. Shannon RE (1975) Systems simulation: the art and science. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  28. ter Hofstede AHM, van der Aalst WMP, Adams M, Russell N (2010) Modern business process automation: YAWL and its support environment. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van der Aalst WMP (2010) Business process simulation revisited. In Barjis J (ed) Enterprise and organizational modeling and simulation, Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 63. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  30. van der Aalst WMP (2011) Process mining: discovery, conformance and enhancement of business processes. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van der Aalst WMP (2013) Business process management: a comprehensive survey. ISRN Software Engineering. doi:10.1155/2013/507984, pp 1–37
  32. van der Aalst WMP, Dustdar S (2012) Process mining put into context. IEEE Internet Comput 16(1):82–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van der Aalst WMP, Voorhoeve M (2000) Simulation handbook. BPM Center Report BPM00-04, BPMcenter.org, 2000. (Original Dutch version appeared as “W.M.P. van der Aalst. Handboek Simulatie. Computing science reports 95/32, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 1995”)Google Scholar
  34. van der Aalst WMP, Stahl C (2011) Modeling business processes: a Petri net oriented approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  35. van der Aalst WMP (2014) Business process simulation survival guide. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 337–370Google Scholar
  36. Weske M (2007) Business process management: concepts, languages, architectures. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Widmer G, Kubat M (1996) Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Machine Learning 23:69–101Google Scholar
  38. Yerkes RM, Dodson JD (1908) The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J Comparative Neurol Psychol 18:459–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Business Process Management DisciplineQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.International Laboratory of Process-Aware Information SystemsNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations