The Time-Varying Beveridge Curve

Part of the Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance book series (DMEF, volume 17)


We use a Bayesian time-varying parameter structural VAR with stochastic volatility to investigate changes in both the reduced-form relationship between vacancies and the unemployment rate, and in their relationship conditional on permanent and transitory output shocks, in the post-WWII United States. Evidence points towards similarities and differences between the Great Recession and the Volcker disinflation, and widespread time variation along two key dimensions. First, the slope of the Beveridge curve exhibits a large extent of variation from the mid-1960s on. It is also notably pro-cyclical, whereby the gain is positively correlated with the transitory component of output. The evolution of the slope of the Beveridge curve during the Great Recession is very similar to its evolution during the Volcker recession in terms of both its magnitude and its time profile. Second, both the Great Inflation episode and the subsequent Volcker disinflation are characterized by a significantly larger negative correlation between the reduced-form innovations to vacancies and the unemployment rate than the rest of the sample period. Those years also exhibit a greater cross-spectral coherence between the two series at business-cycle frequencies. This suggests that they are driven by common shocks.


Unemployment Rate Business Cycle Stochastic Volatility Great Recession Vacancy Rate 



The views in this paper are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, the Board of Governors, or the Federal Reserve System. We are grateful to participants at the Applied Time Series Econometrics Workshop at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and the Midwest Macroeconomics Meetings at the University of Colorado Boulder for useful comments and suggestions.


  1. Andrews, D. K. (1991). Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation-consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica, 59, 817–858. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnichon, R. (2010). Building a composite help-wanted index. Economics Letters, 109, 175–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benati, L. (2007). Drifts and breaks in labor productivity. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 31, 2847–2877. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, O. J., & Diamond, P. (1989). The Beveridge curve. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, O. J., & Quah, D. (1989). The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. The American Economic Review, 79, 655–673. Google Scholar
  6. Carter, C. K., & Kohn, R. (1994). On Gibbs sampling for state space models. Biometrika, 81, 541–553. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cogley, T., & Sargent, T. J. (2002). Evolving post-World War II U.S. inflation dynamics. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 16, 331–388. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cogley, T., & Sargent, T. J. (2005). Drifts and volatilities: monetary policies and outcomes in the post-WWII U.S. Review of Economic Dynamics, 8, 262–302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernández-Villaverde, J., & Rubio-Ramirez, J. (2007). How structural are structural parameter values? NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 22, 83–132. Google Scholar
  10. Furlanetto, F., & Groshenny, N. (2012). Mismatch shocks and unemployment during the Great Recession. Manuscript, Norges Bank. Google Scholar
  11. Galí, J. (1999). Technology, employment, and the business cycle: do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations? The American Economic Review, 89, 249–271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galí, J., & Gambetti, L. (2009). On the sources of the great moderation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1, 26–57. Google Scholar
  13. Jacquier, E., Polson, N. G., & Rossi, P. E. (1994). Bayesian analysis of stochastic volatility models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 12, 371–389. Google Scholar
  14. Lubik, T. A. (2013). The shifting and twisting Beveridge curve: an aggregate perspective. Manuscript, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Google Scholar
  15. Newey, W., & West, K. (1987). A simple positive semi-definite heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation-consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703–708. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Primiceri, G. (2005). Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy. Review of Economic Studies, 72, 821–852. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rubio-Ramirez, J., Waggoner, D., & Zha, T. (2005). Structural vector autoregressions: theory of identification and algorithms for inference. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 665–696. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sahin, A., Song, J., Topa, G., & Violante, G. L. (2012). Mismatch unemployment (Staff Reports No. 566). Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Google Scholar
  19. Shimer, R. (2005). The cyclical behavior of equilibrium unemployment and vacancies. The American Economic Review, 95, 25–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stock, J., & Watson, M. M. (1996). Evidence of structural instability in macroeconomic time series relations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14, 11–30. Google Scholar
  21. Stock, J., & Watson, M. M. (1998). Median-unbiased estimation of coefficient variance in a time-varying parameter model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 349–358. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Research DepartmentFederal Reserve Bank of RichmondRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations