Maturation of the Dutch Social Housing Model and Perspectives for the Future

Chapter

Abstract

The Dutch social rented sector has acquired an international reputation because of its social nature and the way it has evolved. With around 32 % of the total stock, the size of the sector is much bigger than in other western European countries. Also, the development of the sector after the Second World War is unique. The current position is determined by the specific structure of the Dutch welfare state and the country’s distinct housing policy. It is also the result of the shifting balance of supply and demand in the national housing policy. In this chapter, we explain the development of the Dutch social rented sector on the basis of the above-mentioned characteristics. We start with an international comparison regarding the position of the Dutch social rented sector. We will also pay attention to the background of the successful development of this sector: the financing system, the unique guarantee system, and the interplay between the central government and local housing associations. The chapter concludes with an exploration of the future of the social rented sector in the Netherlands. Due to all kinds of processes and developments, the social rented sector in the Netherlands is now at a crossroad, and important policy decisions have to be made.

Keywords

Welfare State Housing Market Social Housing Housing Association Housing Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Boelhouwer PJ (2007) The future of Dutch housing associations. J Housing Built Environ 22(4):383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boelhouwer PJ, Hoekstra J (2009) Towards a better balance on the Dutch housing market? Analysis and policy proposition. Eur J Housing Policy 9(4):457–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boelhouwer P, Hoekstra J (2012) Housing and the state in Western Europe. In: Smith SJ, Elsinga M, Fox O’Mahony L, Seow Eng O, Watcher S, Hamnett C (eds) International encyclopedia of housing and home, vol 3. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boelhouwer P, Priemus H (2012) Housing system reform: the opinion of advisory board versus political reality in the Netherlands. J Housing Built Environ 27(4):527–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boelhouwer PJ, van der Heijden HMH (1992) Housing systems in Europe: Part I, A comparative study of housing policy, Housing and urban policy studies 1. Delft University Press, DelftGoogle Scholar
  6. Centraal Fonds Volkshuisvesting (Central Housing Fund) (2011) Jaarverslag 2010 (Annual Report 2010). CFV, HuizenGoogle Scholar
  7. Centraal Fonds Volkshuisvesting (2012) Sectorbeeld realisaties woningcorporaties. Verslagjaar 2011 (Picture of sector realisations housing associations. Year 2011). CFV, BaarnGoogle Scholar
  8. Conijn J (2011) Woningcorporaties op een kruispunt. Amsterdam School of Real Estate, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Danermark B, Elander I (1994) Social rented housing in Europe: policy, tenure and design, Housing and urban policy studies 9. Delft University Press, DelftGoogle Scholar
  10. Esping-Andersen G (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Forum for Housing and Living (2012) Woningcorporaties op eigen benen: verdienen om te kunnen dienen. Forum for Housing and Living, NaardenGoogle Scholar
  12. Gruis V (1997) The Netherlands. In: Boelhouwer PJ (ed) Financing the social rented sector in Western Europe. Delft University Press, Delft, pp 7–20Google Scholar
  13. Harloe M (1995) The people’s home? Social rented housing in Europe and America. Blackwell, Oxford/CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Heerma E (1989) Nota volkshuisvesting in de jaren negentig (Memorandum on Housing in the 1990s). The Hague (ministerie VROM)Google Scholar
  15. Kemeny J (1995) From public housing to the social market: rental policy strategies in comparative perspective. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kemeny J (2006) Corporatism and housing regimes. Housing Theory Soc 23(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murie A (1992) Public rented housing in Britain. In: Danermark B, Elander I (eds) Social rented housing in Europe: policy, tenure and design, Housing and urban policy studies 9. Delft University Press, Delft, pp 77–94Google Scholar
  18. Priemus H (1995) How to abolish social housing? The Dutch case. Int J Urban Reg Res 19(1)Google Scholar
  19. Torgersen U (1987) Housing: the wobbly pillar under the welfare state. In: Turner B, Kemeny J, Ludqvist L (eds) Between state and market: housing in the post-industrial era. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, pp 116–127Google Scholar
  20. van der Schaar J (1991) Volkshuisvesting een zaak van beleid (Social housing: a matter of policy). The Spectrum, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. Waarborgfonds Sociale Woningbouw (Social House-building Guarantee Fund) (WSW) (2011) Jaarverslag 2010. WSW, HuizenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OTB Research for the Built Environment, Faculty of Architecture and the Built EnvironmentDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations