Advertisement

Analyzing Enterprise Models Using Enterprise Architecture-Based Ontology

  • Sagar Sunkle
  • Vinay Kulkarni
  • Suman Roychoudhury
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8107)

Abstract

Development and maintenance of enterprise systems is becoming more difficult due to change drivers along multiple interconnected dimensions. It is advisable to model the enterprise first and analyze it for potential concerns. For modeling enterprises, ontologies have been considered apt and have been used in the past for the same, but application of ontologies for EA analysis based on concepts of enterprise and relations between them have been scarce. We present our ongoing work on analyzing enterprise models using EA-based ontological representation of enterprise. Our contributions are twofold: first, we show how an existing EA modeling language can be leveraged to create EA ontology and second, we show how two known EA analyses can be realized using this ontology. Initial results suggest that ontology representation facilitates basic EA analysis prototyping due to right mix of representation and inference functionalities and is extensible for more involved EA analyses.

Keywords

Ontology Enterprise Models Analysis Enterprise Architecture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kulkarni, V., Venkatesh, R., Reddy, S.: Generating Enterprise Applications from Models. In: Bruel, J.-M., Bellahsène, Z. (eds.) OOIS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2426, pp. 270–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kulkarni, V., Reddy, S.: Introducing MDA in Large IT Consultancy Organization. In: APSEC, pp. 419–426. IEEE Computer Society (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kulkarni, V., Reddy, S., Rajbhoj, A.: Scaling Up Model Driven Engineering – Experience and Lessons Learnt. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6395, pp. 331–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kulkarni, V.: Raising Family is a Good Practice. In: Apel, S., Batory, D.S., Czarnecki, K., Heidenreich, F., Kästner, C., Nierstrasz, O. (eds.) FOSD, pp. 72–79. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kulkarni, V., Barat, S., Roychoudhury, S.: Towards Business Application Product Lines. In: [35], pp. 285–301Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sunkle, S., Kulkarni, V.: Cost Estimation For Model-driven Engineering. In: [35], pp. 659–675Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sunkle, S., Kulkarni, V., Roychoudhury, S.: Analyzable Enterprise Models Using Ontology. In: Deneckère, R., Proper, H.A. (eds.) CAiSE Forum. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 998, pp. 33–40. CEUR-WS.org (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kulkarni, V., Roychoudhury, S., Sunkle, S., Clark, T., Barn, B.: Modeling and Enterprises - The Past, the Present, and the Future. In: MODELSWARD 2013 (accepted, 2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Groenewegen, L., Stam, A., Stevens, S., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Change Impact Analysis Of Enterprise Architectures. In: Zhang, D., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Shyu, M.L. (eds.) IRI, pp. 177–181. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Torre, L.W.N., Lankhorst, M.M., ter Doest, H., Campschroer, J.T.P., Arbab, F.: Landscape Maps for Enterprise Architectures. In: Martinez, F.H., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 351–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fox, M.S.: The TOVE Project Towards a Common-sense Model of the Enterprise. In: Belli, F., Radermacher, F.J. (eds.) IEA/AIE 1992. LNCS, vol. 604, pp. 25–34. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uschold, M., King, M., House, R., Moralee, S., Zorgios, Y.: The Enterprise Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review 13, 31–89 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fraser, J., Tate, A., Bridge, S.: The Enterprise Tool Set - An Open Enterprise Architecture (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gruninger, M., Fox, M.S.: An Activity Ontology for Enterprise Modelling (June 1994), http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/tove/active/active.html
  15. 15.
    Fox, M.S., Barbuceanu, M., Gruninger, M.: An Organisation Ontology For Enterprise Modelling: Preliminary Concepts For Linking Structure And Behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET-ICE 1995), p. 71. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling. Communication and Analysis. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M.M., van Buuren, R., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Bonsangue, M.M., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Concepts For Modeling Enterprise Architectures. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 13(3), 257–287 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kulkarni, V., Sunkle, S.: Next Wave of Servicing Enterprise IT Needs. In: IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, CBI (accepted, 2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    IEEE: Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. IEEE Std 1471-2000 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wagter, R. (Erik) Proper, H.A., Witte, D.: A Practice-Based Framework for Enterprise Coherence. In: Proper, E., Gaaloul, K., Harmsen, F., Wrycza, S. (eds.) PRET 2012. LNBIP, vol. 120, pp. 77–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A Practical OWL-DL Reasoner. Web Semant. 5(2), 51–53 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haren, V., Publishing, V.H.: ArchiMate 2. 0 Specification. Van Haren Publishing Series. Bernan Assoc. (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berrisford, G., Lankhorst, M.: Using ArchiMate with an Architecture Method. Via Nova Architectura (June 2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Buuren, R., Jonkers, H., Iacob, M.-E., Strating, P.: Composition of Relations in Enterprise Architecture Models. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Parisi-Presicce, F., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3256, pp. 39–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jonkers, H., Band, I., Quartel, D.: Archisurance Case Study. The Open Group Case Study (Document Number Y121) (January 2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kung, D., Gao, J., Hsia, P., Wen, F., Toyoshima, Y., Chen, C.: Change Impact Identification in Object Oriented Software Maintenance. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 202–211 (September 1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sunkle, S., Kulkarni, V., Roychoudhury, S.: Intentional Modeling for Problem Solving in Enterprise Architecture. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS (accepted, 2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sunkle, S., Roychoudhury, S., Kulkarni, V.: Using Intentional and System Dynamics Modeling to Address WHYs in Enterprise Architecture. In: International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (ICSOFT-EA) (accepted, 2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yu, E.S.K., Strohmaier, M., Deng, X.: Exploring Intentional Modeling and Analysis for Enterprise Architecture. In: Tenth IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) Workshops, p. 32 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horkoff, J., Yu, E.: Evaluating Goal Achievement in Enterprise Modeling – An Interactive Procedure and Experiences. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 39, pp. 145–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    de Freitas, R.P., Veloso, P.A.S., Veloso, S.R.M., Viana, P.: Reasoning with Graphs. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 165, 201–212 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Närman, P., Johnson, P., Ekstedt, M., Chenine, M., König, J.: Enterprise Architecture Analysis for Data Accuracy Assessments. In: EDOC, pp. 24–33. IEEE Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Iacob, M., Jonkers, H.: Quantitative Analysis of Enterprise Architectures. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications, INTEROP-ESA (February 2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Johnson, P., Lagerström, R., Närman, P., Simonsson, M.: Enterprise Architecture Analysis With Extended Influence Diagrams. Information Systems Frontiers 9(2-3), 163–180 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    France, R.B., Kazmeier, J., Breu, R., Atkinson, C. (eds.): MODELS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7590. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sagar Sunkle
    • 1
  • Vinay Kulkarni
    • 1
  • Suman Roychoudhury
    • 1
  1. 1.Tata Research Development and Design Center, Tata Consultancy ServicesPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations