Advertisement

ORG-Master: Combining Classifications, Matrices and Diagrams in the Enterprise Architecture Modeling Tool

  • Lev Grigoriev
  • Dmitry Kudryavtsev
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 394)

Abstract

Enterprise architecture management is the basis of systemic enterprise transformations and information technology architecture development. Nowadays enterprise architecting is almost synonymous to diagramming. Diagrams are effective for knowledge elicitation, structuring, and dissemination. But as the number of diagrams and their types grows, they overlap and evolve, it becomes hard to maintain a collection of interrelated diagrams, even with the help of a common repository. Besides the very nature of enterprise architecting requires a lot of classifications (e.g. process architecture/classification) and matrices (goals - processes, processes - organizational roles, processes - applications…). The ORG-Master tool combines classifications and matrices with traditional diagram-based technologies.

Keywords

knowledge structuring knowledge acquisition knowledge visualization enterprise architecture management tool enterprise modeling tool matrices classifications diagrams matrix method multi-representation technology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Buckl, S., Schweda, C.M.: On the State-of-the-Art in Enterprise Architecture Management Literature. Technical University of Munich (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scott Bittler, R.: Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Architecture Tools, ID G00234030, Gartner Inc. (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lengler, R., Eppler, M.: Towards a Periodic Table of Visualization Methods for Management. In: Conference on Graphics and Visualization in Engineering, pp. 1–6 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghoniem, M., Fekete, J., Castagliola, P.: On the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations: a controlled experiment and statistical analysis. Information Visualization 4(2), 114–135 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keller, R., Eckert, C.M., Clarkson, P.J.: Matrices or node-link diagrams: which visual representation is better for visualising connectivity models? Information Visualization 5, 62–76 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    TOGAF® 9.1, Part IV: Architecture Content Framework: Architectural Artifacts, http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap35.html (retrieved June 20, 2013)
  7. 7.
    Davis, R.: ARIS Design Platform Advanced Process Modelling and Administration. Springer-Verlag London Limited, London (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IBM Rational® System Architect v. 11.4, Information center, http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/rsysarch/v11/topic/com.ibm.sa.help.doc/topics/c_Matrix_Editor.html (retrieved March 15, 2013)
  9. 9.
    Casewise Modeler, http://www.casewise.com/products/modeler (retrieved March 15, 2013)
  10. 10.
    Grigoriev, L., Kudryavtsev, D.: The ontology-based business architecture engineering framework. In: The 10th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 233–252. IOS Press (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.): Handbook on Ontologies. Springer (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gavrilova, T.: Ontological engineering for practical knowledge work. In: Apolloni, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds.) KES 2007, Part II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4693, pp. 1154–1161. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    France, R., Rumpe, B.: Domain specific modeling. Software and Systems Modeling 4(1), 1–3 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koznov, D.: Process Model of DSM Solution Development and Evolution for Small and Medium-Sized Software Companies. In: Workshops of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, pp. 85–92 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lev Grigoriev
    • 1
  • Dmitry Kudryavtsev
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Business Engineering GroupSaint-PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnic UniversityRussia

Personalised recommendations