Holiday Pictures or Blockbuster Movies? Insights into Copyright Infringement in User Uploads to One-Click File Hosters

  • Tobias Lauinger
  • Kaan Onarlioglu
  • Abdelberi Chaabane
  • Engin Kirda
  • William Robertson
  • Mohamed Ali Kaafar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8145)

Abstract

According to copyright holders, One-Click Hosters (OCHs) such as Megaupload are frequently used to host and distribute copyright infringing content. This has spurred numerous initiatives by legislators, law enforcement and content producers. Due to a lack of representative data sets that properly capture private uses of OCHs (such as sharing holiday pictures among friends), to date, there are no reliable estimates of the proportion of legitimate and infringing files being uploaded to OCHs. This situation leaves the field to the partisan arguments brought forward by copyright owners and OCHs. In this paper, we provide empirical data about the uses and misuses of OCHs by analysing six large data sets containing file metadata that we extracted from a range of popular OCHs. We assess the status of these files with regard to copyright infringement and show that at least 26% to 79% of them are potentially infringing. Perhaps surprising after the shutdown by the FBI for alleged copyright infringement, we found Megaupload to have the second highest proportion of legitimate files in our study.

Keywords

Abuse illicit file sharing one-click hosting upload analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    An estimate of infringing use of the Internet. Tech. rep., Envisional Ltd. (January 2011), http://documents.envisional.com/docs/Envisional-Internet_Usage-Jan2011.pdf
  2. 2.
    Antoniades, D., Markatos, E., Dovrolis, C.: One-click hosting services: A file-sharing hideout. In: IMC 2009. ACM (November 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cuevas, R., Kryczka, M., Cuevas, A., Kaune, S., Guerrero, C., Rejaie, R.: Is content publishing in BitTorrent altruistic or profit-driven? In: Co-NEXT 2010 (November 2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Enigmax: Hotfile goes to war against copyright infringers (February 2011), http://torrentfreak.com/hotfile-goes-to-war-against-copyright-infringers-110219/
  5. 5.
    Ernesto: Hotfile’s most downloaded files are open source software (April 2012), http://torrentfreak.com/hotfiles-most-donwloaded-files-are-open-source-software-120411/
  6. 6.
    Ernesto: Rapidshare limits public download traffic to drive away pirates (November 2012), http://torrentfreak.com/rapidshare-limits-public-download-traffic-to-drive-away-pirates-121108/
  7. 7.
    Jain, R.: The art of computer systems performance analysis: Techniques for experimental design, easurements, simulation, and modeling. Wiley (April 1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jelveh, Z., Ross, K.: Profiting from filesharing: A measurement study of economic incentives in cyberlockers. In: P2P 2012. IEEE (September 2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kammerstetter, M., Platzer, C., Wondracek, G.: Vanity, cracks and malware: Insights into the anti-copy protection ecosystem. In: CCS 2012. ACM (October 2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kravets, D.: Feds tell Megaupload users to forget about their data (June 2012), http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/06/feds-megaupload-data/
  11. 11.
    Labovitz, C., Iekel-Johnson, S., McPherson, D., Oberheide, J., Jahanian, F.: Internet inter-domain traffic. In: SIGCOMM 2010. ACM (August 2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lauinger, T., Kirda, E., Michiardi, P.: Paying for piracy? An analysis of one-click hosters’ controversial reward schemes. In: Balzarotti, D., Stolfo, S.J., Cova, M. (eds.) RAID 2012. LNCS, vol. 7462, pp. 169–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lauinger, T., Szydlowski, M., Onarlioglu, K., Wondracek, G., Kirda, E., Kruegel, C.: Clickonomics: Determining the effect of anti-piracy measures for one-click hosting. In: NDSS 2013. Internet Society (February 2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liang, J., Kumar, R., Xi, Y., Ross, K.: Pollution in P2P file sharing systems. In: INFOCOM 2005. IEEE (March 2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mahanti, A., Carlsson, N., Williamson, C.: Content sharing dynamics in the global file hosting landscape. In: MASCOTS 2012, pp. 219–228. IEEE (August 2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahanti, A., Williamson, C., Carlsson, N., Arlitt, M., Mahanti, A.: Characterizing the file hosting ecosystem: A view from the edge. Performance Evaluation 68(11), 1085–1102 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nikiforakis, N., Balduzzi, M., Acker, S.V., Joosen, W., Balzarotti, D.: Exposing the lack of privacy in file hosting services. In: LEET 2011. Usenix (March 2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rehn, A.: The politics of contraband: The honor economies of the warez scene. Journal of Socio-Economics 33(3), 359–374 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandoval, G.: MPAA wants more criminal cases brought against ‘rogue’ sites (March 2012), http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-57407346-261/mpaa-wants-more-criminal-cases-brought-against-rogue-sites/
  20. 20.
    Sanjuàs-Cuxart, J., Barlet-Ros, P., Solé-Pareta, J.: Measurement based analysis of one-click file hosting services. Journal of Network and Systems Management (May 2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Watters, P.A., Layton, R., Dazeley, R.: How much material on BitTorrent is infringing content? A case study. Information Security Technical Report 16(2), 79–87 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilson, D.: Exclusive: Megaupload issues response to RIAA over Mastercard cutoff (December 2010), http://www.zeropaid.com/news/91680/exclusive-megaupload-issues-response-to-riaa-over-mastercard-cutoff/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tobias Lauinger
    • 1
  • Kaan Onarlioglu
    • 1
  • Abdelberi Chaabane
    • 2
  • Engin Kirda
    • 1
  • William Robertson
    • 1
  • Mohamed Ali Kaafar
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.INRIAGrenobleFrance
  3. 3.NICTASydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations