Directional Context Helps: Guiding Semantic Relatedness Computation by Asymmetric Word Associations

  • Shahida Jabeen
  • Xiaoying Gao
  • Peter Andreae
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8180)

Abstract

Semantic relatedness computation is the task of measuring the degree of relatedness of two concepts. It is a well known problem with applications ranging from computational linguistics to cognitive psychology. In all existing approaches, relatedness is assumed to be symmetric i.e. the relatedness of terms t i and term t j is considered the same as the relatedness of terms t j and t i . However, there are tasks such as free word association, where the association strength assumed to be asymmetric. In free word association, the given term determines the context in which the association strength must be computed. Based on this key observation, the paper presents a new approach to computing term relatedness guided by asymmetric association. The focus of this paper is on using Wikipedia for extracting directional context of each given term and computing the association of input term pair in this context. The proposed approach is generic enough to deal with both symmetric as well as asymmetric relatedness computation problems. Empirical evaluation on multiple benchmark datasets shows encouraging results when our automatically computed relatedness scores are correlated with human judgments.

Keywords

Semantic Relatedness Free Word Associations Asymmetric Term Associations Symmetric Relatedness Directional Context 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Strube, M., Ponzetto, S.P.: Wikirelate! computing semantic relatedness using wikipedia. In: Proceedings of Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gabrilovich, E., Markovitch, S.: Computing semantic relatedness using wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1606–1611 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Milne, D., Witten, I.H.: An effective, low-cost measure of semantic relatedness obtained from wikipedia links. In: Proceeding of AAAI Workshop on Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence: An Evolving Synergy, pp. 25–30 (July 2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zesch, T., Gurevych, I.: Wisdom of crowds versus wisdom of linguists, measuring the semantic relatedness of words. Nat. Lang. Eng. 16(1), 25–59 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hassan, S., Banea, C., Mihalcea, R.: Measuring semantic relatedness using multilingual representations. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2012, vol. 1, vol. 2, pp. 20–29. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.P.: Babelrelate! a joint multilingual approach to computing semantic relatedness. In: AAAI (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yazdani, M., Popescu-Belis, A.: Computing text semantic relatedness using the contents and links of a hypertext encyclopedia. Artif. Intell. 194, 176–202 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halawi, G., Dror, G., Gabrilovich, E., Koren, Y.: Large-scale learning of word relatedness with constraints. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2012, pp. 1406–1414 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller, G.A., Charles, W.G.: Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes 6(1), 1–28 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rubenstein, H., Goodenough, J.B.: Contextual correlates of synonymy. Commun. ACM 8, 627–633 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Finkelstein, L., Gabrilovich, E., Matias, Y., Rivlin, E., Solan, Z., Wolfman, G., Ruppin, E.: Placing search in context: the concept revisited. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 20(1), 116–131 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hliaoutakis, A.: Semantic similarity measures in mesh ontology and their application to information retrieval on medline. Master’s thesis (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pedersen, T., Pakhomov, S.V.S., Patwardhan, S., Chute, C.G.: Measures of semantic similarity and relatedness in the biomedical domain. J. of Biomedical Informatics 40, 288–299 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hassan, S., Mihalcea, R.: Semantic relatedness using salient semantic analysis. In: AAAI (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al-Mubaid, H., Nguyen, H.A.: Measuring semantic similarity between biomedical concepts within multiple ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C 39(4), 389–398 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 296–304. Morgan Kaufmann (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang, J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In: Proceedings of International Conference Research on Computational Linguistics (ROCLING), pp. 19–33 (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., Blettner, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 19(1), 17–30 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: ch. 11, Combining Local Context and WordNet Similarity for Word Sense Identification, pp. 265–283. The MIT Press (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 448–453 (1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Medelyan, O., Milne, D., Legg, C., Witten, I.H.: Mining meaning from wikipedia. International Journel of Human Computer Studies 67, 716–754 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nelson, D.L., Mcevoy, C.L., Schreiber, T.A.: The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 402–407 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Radinsky, K., Agichtein, E., Gabrilovich, E., Markovitch, S.: A word at a time: computing word relatedness using temporal semantic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2011, pp. 337–346 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shahida Jabeen
    • 1
  • Xiaoying Gao
    • 1
  • Peter Andreae
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering and Computer ScienceVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations