Towards a Realistic Distribution of Cells in Synthetically Generated 3D Cell Populations

  • David Svoboda
  • Vladimír Ulman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8157)

Abstract

In fluorescence microscopy, the proper evaluation of image segmentation algorithms is still an open problem. In the field of cell segmentation, such evaluation can be seen as a study of the given algorithm how well it can discover individual cells as a function of the number of them in an image (size of cell population), their mutual positions (density of cell clusters), and the level of noise. Principally, there are two approaches to the evaluation. One approach requires real input images and an expert that verifies the segmentation results. This is, however, expert dependent and, namely when handling 3D data, very tedious. The second approach uses synthetic images with ground truth data to which the segmentation result is compared objectively. In this paper, we propose a new method for generating synthetic 3D images showing naturally distributed cell populations attached to microscope slide. Cell count and clustering probability are user parameters of the method.

Keywords

distance map 3D imaging cell populations cross-correlation simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Danielsson, P.E.: Euclidean distance mapping. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 14, 227–248 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dufour, A., Shinin, V., Tajbakhsh, S., Guillen-Aghion, N., Olivo-Marin, J.C., Zimmer, C.: Segmenting and tracking fluorescent cells in dynamic 3-D microscopy with coupled active surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14(9), 1396–1410 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grigoryan, A.M., Hostetter, G., Kallioniemi, O., Dougherty, E.R.: Simulation toolbox for 3D-FISH spot-counting algorithms. Real-Time Imaging 8(3), 203–212 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lehmussola, A., Ruusuvuori, P., Selinummi, J., Huttunen, H., Yli-Harja, O.: Computational framework for simulating fluorescence microscope images with cell populations. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26(7), 1010–1016 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lockett, S.J., Sudar, D., Thompson, C.T., Pinkel, D., Gray, J.W.: Efficient, interactive, and three-dimensional segmentation of cell nuclei in thick tissue sections. Cytometry 31, 275–286 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malm, P., Brun, A., Bengtsson, E.: Papsynth: simulated bright-field images of cervical smears. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Int. Conference on ISBI, ISBI 2010, pp. 117–120. IEEE Press (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murphy, R.: CellOrganizer: Image-derived models of subcellular organization and protein distribution. Methods Cell. Biol. 110 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rajaram, S., Pavie, B., Hac, N.E.F., Altschuler, S.J., Wu, L.F.: Simucell: a flexible framework for creating synthetic microscopy images. Nat. Methods 9(7), 634–635 (2012), http://www.biomedsearch.com/nih/SimuCell-flexible-framework-creating-synthetic/22743763.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soille, P.: Morphological Image Analysis. Springer (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Solórzano, C.O.D., Rodriguez, E.G., Jones, A., Pinkel, D., Gray, J.W., Sudar, D., Lockett, S.J.: Segmentation of confocal microscope images of cell nuclei in thick tissue sections. Journal of Microscopy 193, 212–226 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Svoboda, D.: Efficient computation of convolution of huge images. In: Maino, G., Foresti, G.L. (eds.) ICIAP 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6978, pp. 453–462. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Svoboda, D., Kašík, M., Maška, M., Hubený, J., Stejskal, S., Zimmermann, M.: On simulating 3d fluorescent microscope images. In: Kropatsch, W.G., Kampel, M., Hanbury, A. (eds.) CAIP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4673, pp. 309–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Svoboda, D., Kozubek, M., Stejskal, S.: Generation of digital phantoms of cell nuclei and simulation of image formation in 3d image cytometry. Cytometry Part A 75A(6), 494–509 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Svoboda, D., Ulman, V.: Generation of synthetic image datasets for time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. In: Campilho, A., Kamel, M. (eds.) ICIAR 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7325, pp. 473–482. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xiong, W., Wang, Y., Ong, S.H., Lim, J.H., Jiang, L.: Learning cell geometry models for cell image simulation: An unbiased approach. In: Proceedings of Int. Conference on ICIP, pp. 1897–1900 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Svoboda
    • 1
  • Vladimír Ulman
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Biomedical Image AnalysisMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations