Towards an Online Lab Portal for Inquiry-Based STEM Learning at School

  • Sten Govaerts
  • Yiwei Cao
  • Andrii Vozniuk
  • Adrian Holzer
  • Danilo Garbi Zutin
  • Elio San Cristóbal Ruiz
  • Lars Bollen
  • Sven Manske
  • Nils Faltin
  • Christophe Salzmann
  • Eleftheria Tsourlidaki
  • Denis Gillet
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8167)

Abstract

Nowadays, the knowledge economy is growing rapidly. To sustain future growth, more well educated people in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) are needed. In the Go-Lab project we aim to motivate and orient students from an early age on to study STEM fields in their future educational path by applying inquiry learning using online labs. This paper presents an inquiry learning portal where teachers can discover, use and enhance online labs appropriate for their courses and students can acquire scientific methodology skills while doing experiments using the labs. The Go-Lab portal architecture is presented, which contains a repository of online labs, inquiry learning spaces and complementary services. The paper discusses a first version of the portal and our future plans.

Keywords

online lab portal design inquiry learning metadata architecture interoperability lab repository 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Avison, D., Shah, H.: The Information Systems Development Life Cycle: A First Course in Information Systems. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co. (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bogdanov, E., et al.: A social media platform in higher education. In: Proc. of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conf. (EDUCON), pp. 1–8 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohl, O., Scheuhase, J., Sengler, R., Winand, U.: The sharable content object reference model (SCORM) – a critical review. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Computers in Education, vol. 2, pp. 950–951 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maier, C., Niederststtter, M.: Lab2go A repository to locate online laboratories. Journal of Online Engineering (iJOE) 6(1) (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahrendorf, D., Dikke, D., Faltin, N.: Sharing personal learning environments for widget based systems using a widget marketplace. In: Proc. of the PLE Conf. (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lowe, D., et al.: LabShare: Towards a national approach to laboratory sharing. Proc. of the 20th Australasian Assoc. for Engineering Education Conf. (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drucker, P.: The age of: Guidelines to our changing society. Transaction books, Transaction Pubs. (1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garcia-Zubia, J., Lopez-de Ipina, D., Orduna, P., Hernandez-Jayo, U.: Experience with weblab-deusto. In: The IEEE Int. Symp. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 4, pp. 3190–3195 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gillet, D., de Jong, T., Sotirou, S., Salzmann, C.: Personalised Learning Spaces and Federated Online Labs for STEM Education at School: Supporting Teacher Communities and Inquiry Learning. In: Proc. of the 4th IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 769–773. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harward, V., et al.: The iLab shared architecture: A web services infrastructure to build communities of internet accessible laboratories. Proceedings of the IEEE 96(6), 931–950 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Jong, T., Linn, M.C., Zacharia, Z.C.: Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science 340(6130), 305–308 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Minner, D.D., Levy, A.J., Century, J.: Inquiry-based science instruction - what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parker, G.G.: Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science 51(10), 1494–1504 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    NISO: Understanding Metadata. National Inf. Standards Org. Press (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Richter, T., Boehringer, D., Jeschke, S.: LiLa: A European project on networked experiments. In: Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2009/2010, pp. 307–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rocard, M., et al.: Rocard report: Science education now: a new pedagogy for the future of Europe. Tech. rep., European Commission (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singer, S., Hilton, L., Schweingruber, H.: America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. The National Academies Press (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Richter, T., Grube, P., Zutin, D.: A standardized metadata set for annotation of virtual and remote laboratories. In: The IEEE Int. WS on Multimedia Tech. for E-Learning (MTEL) (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turnitsa, C.: Extending the levels of conceptual interoperability model. In: Proceedings IEEE 2005 Summer Computer Simulation Conference. IEEE CS Press (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vogel, O., Arnold, I., Chughtai, A., Kehrer, T.: Software Architecture – A Comprehensive Framework and Guide for Practitioners. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vozniuk, A., Govaerts, S., Gillet, D.: Towards portable learning analytics dashboards. In: Proc. of the 13th IEEE Int. Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zutin, D., Auer, M., Maier, C., Niederstatter, M.: Lab2go – a repository to locate educational online laboratories. In: 2010 IEEE Education Engineering (EDUCON), pp. 1741–1746 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sten Govaerts
    • 1
  • Yiwei Cao
    • 2
  • Andrii Vozniuk
    • 1
  • Adrian Holzer
    • 1
  • Danilo Garbi Zutin
    • 3
  • Elio San Cristóbal Ruiz
    • 4
  • Lars Bollen
    • 5
  • Sven Manske
    • 6
  • Nils Faltin
    • 2
  • Christophe Salzmann
    • 1
  • Eleftheria Tsourlidaki
    • 7
  • Denis Gillet
    • 1
  1. 1.EPFL, REACTLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.IMC AG, Scheer TowerSaarbrückenGermany
  3. 3.Center of Competence in Online Laboratories and Open LearningCarinthia University of Applied SciencesVillachAustria
  4. 4.DIEEC, UNEDMadridSpain
  5. 5.Department of Instructional TechnologyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  6. 6.COLLIDE Research GroupUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  7. 7.Ellinogermaniki Agogi Sxoli Panagea SavvaPalliniGreece

Personalised recommendations