WYSIWYM Authoring of Structured Content Based on Schema.org

  • Ali Khalili
  • Sören Auer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8181)

Abstract

Structured data is picking up on the Web, particularly in the search world. Schema.org, jointly initiated by Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! provides a hierarchical set of vocabularies to embed metadata in HTML pages for an enhanced search and browsing experience. RDFa-Lite, Microdata and JSON-LD as lower semantic techniques have gained more attention by Web users to markup Web pages and even emails based on Schema.org. However, from the user interface point of view, we still lack user-friendly tools that facilitate the process of structured content authoring. The majority of information still is contained in and exchanged using unstructured documents, such as Web pages, text documents, images and videos. This can also not be expected to change, since text, images and videos are the natural way how humans interact with information. In this paper we present RDFaCE as an implementation of WYSIWYM (What-You-See-Is-What-You-Mean) concept for direct manipulation of semantically structured content in conventional modalities. RDFaCE utilizes on-the-fly form generation based on Schema.org vocabulary for embedding metadata within Web documents. Furthermore, it employs external NLP services to enable automatic annotation of entities and to suggest URIs for entities. RDFaCE is written as a plugin for TinyMCE WYSIWYG editor thereby can be easily integrated into existing content management systems.

Keywords

WYSIWYG WYSIWYM Semantic Content Authoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    One Click Annotation. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 699 (February 2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ankolekar, A., Krötzsch, M., Tran, T., Vrandecic, D.: The two cultures: mashing up web 2.0 and the semantic web. In: WWW 2007, pp. 825–834 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burel, G., Cano1, A.E., Lanfranchi, V.: Ozone browser: Augmenting the web with semantic overlays. . CEUR WS Proceedings, vol. 449 (June 2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dadzie, A.-S., Rowe, M.: Approaches to visualising linked data: A survey. Semantic Web 2(2), 89–124 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karger, D.R., Ostler, S., Lee, R.: The web page as a wysiwyg end-user customizable database-backed information management application. In: UIST 2009, pp. 257–260. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khalili, A., Auer, S.: User interfaces for semantic authoring of textual content: A systematic literature review. To Appear in the Journal of Web Semantics (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khalili, A., Auer, S.: Wysiwym – integrated visualization, exploration and authoring of unstructured and semantic content. Submitted to the Semantic Web Journal (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khalili, A., Auer, S., Hladky, D.: The rdfa content editor. In: IEEE COMPSAC 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lopez, V., Uren, V., Sabou, M., Motta, E.: Is question answering fit for the semantic web? a survey. Semantic Web? Interoperability, Usability, Applicability 2(2), 125–155 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mika, P., Potter, T.: Metadata statistics for a large web corpus. In: Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T., Hausenblas, M. (eds.) LDOW. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 937, CEUR-WS.org (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muller, W., Rojas, I., Eberhart, A., Haase, P., Schmidt, M.: A-r-e: The author-review-execute environment. Procedia Computer Science 4, 627–636 (2011); ICCS 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pietriga, E., Bizer, C., Karger, D.R., Lee, R.: Fresnel: A browser-independent presentation vocabulary for RDF. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 158–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Power, R., Power, R., Scott, D., Scott, D., Evans, R., Evans, R.: What you see is what you meant: direct knowledge editing with natural language feedback (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ronallo, J.: HTML5 Microdata and Schema.org. The Code4Lib Journal 16 (February 2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sah, M., Hall, W., Gibbins, N.M., Roure, D.C.D.: Semport - a personalized semantic portal. In: 18th ACM Conf. on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 31–32 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sauer, C.: What you see is wiki – questioning WYSIWYG in the Internet age. In: Proceedings of Wikimania 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spiesser, J., Kitchen, L.: Optimization of html automatically generated by wysiwyg programs. In: WWW 2004, pp. 355–364 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tunkelang, D.: Faceted Search (Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services). Morgan and Claypool Publishers (June 2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Khalili
    • 1
  • Sören Auer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Computer Science, AKSW GroupUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations