Can Machines Make Ethical Decisions?
Independent systems and robots can be of great help to achieve goals and obtain optimal solutions to problems caused by the quantity, variation and complexity of information. However, we always face ethical issues related to the design as well as to the running of such systems. There are many problems, theoretical and practical, in integrating ethical decision making to robots. It is impossible to design or run such systems independently of human wish or will. Even if we create totally independent decision making systems, we would not want to lose control. Can we create really independent ethical decision systems? Recent research showed that emotions are necessary in the process of decision making. It seems that it is necessary for an independent decision system to have “emotions.” In other words, a kind of ultimate purpose is needed that can lead the decision process. This could make a system really independent and by that ethical.
Keywordsrobots systems autonomous independent decision making ethics moral
- 1.Πλάτων [Platon]: Θεαίτητος [Theaitetos]. I.Zαχαρόπουλος [I. Zacharopoulos], Aθήνα [Athens] (1981) Google Scholar
- 2.Πλάτων [Platon]: Aπολογία Σωκράτους [Apology of Socrates]. Kάκτος [Kaktos], Aθήνα [Athens] (1992) Google Scholar
- 3.Πλάτων [Platon]: Πολιτεία [The Republic]. Kάκτος [Kaktos], Aθήνα [Athens] (1992) Google Scholar
- 4.Aριστοτέλης [Aristoteles]: Hθικά Nικομάχεια [Nicomachean Ethics]. (Πάπυρος [Papyros], Aθήνα [Athens]) (1975) Google Scholar
- 5.Kant, I.: Grundläggning av Sedernas Metafysik [Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals]. Daidalos, Stockholm (1785/2006) Google Scholar
- 6.Piaget, J.: The Moral Judgement of the Child. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1932)Google Scholar
- 7.Kohlberg, L.: The Just Community: Approach to Moral Education in Theory and Practice. In: Berkowitz, M., Oser, F. (eds.) Moral Education: Theory and Application, pp. 27–87. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1985)Google Scholar
- 8.Sunstein, C.R.: Moral Heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, 531–573 (2005)Google Scholar
- 10.Kavathatzopoulos, I., Laaksoharju, M.: Computer Aided Ethical Systems Design. In: Arias-Oliva, M., et al. (eds.) The “Backwards, Forwards, and Sideways” Changes of ICT, pp. 332–340. Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Laaksoharju, M.: Let us be Philosophers! Computerized Support for Ethical Decision Making. Uppsala University, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Laaksoharju, M., Kavathatzopoulos, I.: Computerized Support for Ethical Analysis. In: Botti, M., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of CEPE 2009 – Eighth International Computer Ethics and Philosophical Enquiry Conference. Ionian University, Kerkyra (2009)Google Scholar
- 13.Kavathatzopoulos, I.: Philosophizing as a usability method. CEPE 2013, Ambiguous Technologies: Philosophical Issues, Practical Solutions, Human Nature. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Lisbon (in press, 2013) Google Scholar
- 14.Kohlberg, L.: The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. Harper and Row, San Francisco (1984)Google Scholar