Exploring Artificial Intelligence Utilizing BioArt

  • Panagiota Simou
  • Konstantinos Tiligadis
  • Athanasios Alexiou
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 412)

Abstract

While artificial intelligence combined with Bioinformatics and Nanotechnology offers a variety of improvements and a technological and healthcare revolution, Bioartists attempt to replace the traditional artistic medium with biological materials, bio-imaging techniques, bioreactors and several times to treat their own body as an alive canvas. BioArt seems to play the role of a new scientific curator in order to manipulate laboratory aesthetics and bridge trans-humanism creations with culture and tradition.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence BioArt Bioethics Post humanism 

References

  1. 1.
    Alexiou, A., Psixa, M., Vlamos, P.: Ethical Issues of Artificial Biomedical Applications. In: Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I., Papadopoulos, H. (eds.) EANN/AIAI 2011, Part II. IFIP AICT, vol. 364, pp. 297–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexiou, A., Vlamos, P.: Ethics at the Crossroads of Bioinformatics and Nanotechnology. In: 7th International Conference of Computer Ethics and Philosophical Enquiry (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bostrom, N.: How Long Before Super intelligence? International Journal of Futures Studies 2 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roco, M.C., Bainbridge, W.S.: Converging technologies for improving human performance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 4, 281–295 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drexler, E.: Engines of Creation. Bantam, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurzweil, R.: The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. Viking, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moravec, H.: Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zurr, I., Catts, O.: The ethical claims of Bioart: Killing the Other or Self Cannibalism. Art and Ethics 4(2) (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berne, R.W.: Towards the conscientious development of ethical nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics 10, 627–638 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sweeney, E.A.: Social and Ethical Dimensions of Nanoscale Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12(3), 435–464 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stelarc website, http://stelarc.org
  12. 12.
    Orlan website, http://www.orlan.eu
  13. 13.
    Franko-B website, http://www.franko-b.com
  14. 14.
    Kac, E.: Transgenic Art. Leonardo Electronic Almanac 6(11) (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haraway, D.: A cyborg manifesto. Science, Technology and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In: Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The reinvention of nature, pp. 149–181. Routledge, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warwick, K.: Future issues with robots and cyborgs. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4(3), 1–18 (2010), doi:10.2202/1941-6008.1127Google Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.: Order out of Chaos. Bantam Books, University of Michigan (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panagiota Simou
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Tiligadis
    • 1
  • Athanasios Alexiou
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Audio and Visual ArtsIonian UniversityCorfuGreece
  2. 2.Department of InformaticsIonian UniversityCorfuGreece

Personalised recommendations