Advertisement

jamTable: Can Physical Interfaces Support the Collaboration between Novice and Experienced Musicians?

  • Augusto Esteves
  • Filipe Quintal
  • Ian Oakley
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7989)

Abstract

This paper introduces jamTable, a system that enables the collaboration between users playing a standard musical instrument and users interacting with a tangible musical sequencer. In an introductory study both qualitative and quantitative data were collected from eight participants in two setup conditions: Musician-Musician and Novice-Musician pairs. By comparing the performance of participants in these two groups, this paper gathers relevant insights regarding the ability of a tangible musical application such as the jamTable to support musical collaborations between novice and experienced musicians – in both learning or performance activities.

Keywords

Musical Instrument Control Token Experienced Musician Tangible Interface Physical Interface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Antle, A.N.: The CTI framework: informing the design of tangible systems for children. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 195–202. ACM, Baton Rouge (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakker, S., Hoven, E.V.D., Antle, A.N.: MoSo tangibles: evaluating embodied learning. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 85–92. ACM, Funchal (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bischof, M., Conradi, B., Lachenmaier, P., Linde, K., Meier, M., Pötzl, P., André, E.: Xenakis: combining tangible interaction with probability-based musical composition. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 121–124. ACM, Bonn (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buxton, W., Patel, S., Reeves, W., Baecker, R.: Objed and the Design of Timbral Resources. Computer Music Journal 2, 32–44 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costanza, E., Shelley, S.B., Robinson, J.: Introducing Audio d-touch: A Tangible User Interface for Music Composition and Performance. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, London, United Kingdom (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dourish, P.: Where The Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. The MIT Press (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fischer, T., Lau, W.: Marble track music sequencers for children. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 141–144. ACM, Tampere (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical ResearchGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jordà, S.: On stage: the reactable and other musical tangibles go real. International Journal of Arts and Technology 4, 268–287 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jordà, S., Geiger, G., Alonso, M., Kaltenbrunner, M.: The reacTable: exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 139–146. ACM, Baton Rouge (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klemmer, S.R., Hartmann, B., Takayama, L.: How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 140–149. ACM, University Park (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levin, G.: The Table is The Score: An Augmented-Reality Interface for Real-Time, Tangible, Spectrographic Performance. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Computer Music, New Orleans, USA, pp. 151–154 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montessori, M., Gutek, G.L.: The Montessori Method: The Origins of an Educational Innovation. Rowman & Littlefield (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muller, C.: The Role of Caring in the Teacher Student Relationship for At Risk Students. Sociological Inquiry 2, 241–255 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Newton-Dunn, H., Nakano, H., Gibson, J.: Block Jam: A Tangible Interface for Interactive Music. Journal of New Music Research 4, 383–393 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Malley, C., Stanton Fraser, D.: Literature Review in Learning with Tangible TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patten, J., Recht, B., Ishii, H.: Audiopad: a tag-based interface for musical performance. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, National University of Singapore, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 1–6 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shaer, O., Hornecker, E.: Tangible User Interfaces: Past, Present, and Future Directions. In: Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 1–137 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shaer, O., Strait, M., Valdes, C., Feng, T., Lintz, M., Wang, H.: Enhancing genomic learning through tabletop interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2817–2826. ACM, Vancouver (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ullmer, B., Ishii, H.: Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal 3(4), 915–931 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, T.-H.: Tangible Notes: Exploring Virtual Information via Physical ObjectsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wolf, M.: SOUNDGARTEN: A tangible interface that enables children to record, modify and arrange sound samples in a playful way. University of Applied Sciences Cologne (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zaman, B., Abeele, V.V., Markopoulos, P., Marshall, P.: Editorial: the evolving field of tangible interaction for children: the challenge of empirical validation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 4, 367–378 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zuckerman, O., Arida, S., Resnick, M.: Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 859–868. ACM, Portland (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Augusto Esteves
    • 1
  • Filipe Quintal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ian Oakley
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CCCEEUniversity of MadeiraFunchalPortugal
  2. 2.Madeira Interactive Technologies InstituteFunchalPortugal

Personalised recommendations