Dynamic, Behavior-Based User Profiling Using Semantic Web Technologies in a Big Data Context

  • Anett Hoppe
  • Ana Roxin
  • Christophe Nicolle
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8186)


The success of shaping the e-society is crucially dependent on how well technology adapts to the needs of each single user. A thorough understanding of one’s personality, interests, and social connections facilitate the integration of ICT solutions into one’s everyday life. The MindMinings project aims to build an advanced user profile, based on the automatic processing of a user’s navigation traces on the Web. Given the various needs underpinned by our goal (e.g. integration of heterogeneous sources and automatic content extraction), we have selected Semantic Web technologies for their capacity to deliver machine-processable information. Indeed, we have to deal with web-based information known to be highly heterogeneous. Using descriptive languages such as OWL for managing the information contained in Web documents, we allow an automatic analysis, processing and exploitation of the related knowledge. Moreover, we use semantic technology in addition to machine learning techniques, in order to build a very expressive user profile model, including not only isolated “drops” of information, but inter-connected and machine-interpretable information. All developed methods are applied to a concrete industrial need: the analysis of user navigation on the Web to deduct patterns for content recommendation.


User Interest Link Open Data Word Cloud Personalized Search Project Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Calegari, S., Pasi, G.: Personal ontologies: Generation of user profiles based on the {YAGO} ontology. Information Processing & Management 49(3), 640–658 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Degemmis, M., Lops, P., Semeraro, G.: A content-collaborative recommender that exploits wordnet-based user profiles for neighborhood formation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 17(3), 217–255 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gauch, S., Speretta, M., Chandramouli, A., Micarelli, A.: User profiles for personalized information access. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) Adaptive Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 54–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gentili, G., Micarelli, A., Sciarrone, F.: Infoweb: An adaptive information filtering system for the cultural heritage domain. Applied Artificial Intelligence 17(8-9), 715–744 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghorab, M.R., Zhou, D., O’Connor, A., Wade, V.: Personalised information retrieval: survey and classification. In: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, pp. 1–63 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Labrou, Y., Finin, T.: Yahoo! as an ontology: using yahoo! categories to describe documents. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 180–187. ACM (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma, Z., Pant, G., Sheng, O.R.L.: Interest-based personalized search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 25(1), 5 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magnini, B., Strapparava, C.: Improving user modelling with content-based techniques. In: Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Vassileva, J. (eds.) UM 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2109, pp. 74–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mizoguchi, R.: Part 3: Advanced course of ontological engineering. New Generation Computing 22(2), 193–220 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qiu, F., Cho, J.: Automatic identification of user interest for personalized search. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 727–736. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmid, H.: Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In: Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, Manchester, UK, vol. 12, pp. 44–49 (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Semeraro, G., Lops, P., Degemmis, M.: Wordnet-based user profiles for neighborhood formation in hybrid recommender systems. In: Fifth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, HIS 2005, p. 6. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shen, X., Tan, B., Zhai, C.: Implicit user modeling for personalized search. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 824–831. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sieg, A., Mobasher, B., Burke, R.: Ontological user profiles for representing context in web search. In: 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshops, pp. 91–94. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stamou, S., Ntoulas, A.: Search personalization through query and page topical analysis. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19(1-2), 5–33 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Su, Z., Yan, J., Ling, H., Chen, H.: Research on personalized recommendation algorithm based on ontological user interest model. Journal of Computational Information Systems 8(1), 169–181 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anett Hoppe
    • 1
  • Ana Roxin
    • 1
  • Christophe Nicolle
    • 1
  1. 1.CheckSem Group, Laboratoire Electronique, Informatique et ImageUniversité de BourgogneDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations