Development of Information Systems for Transparent Corporate Sustainability Using Data-Driven Technologies

  • Lisa Madlberger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8186)

Abstract

Corporations, as influential players in a global environment, face increased pressure of the society and governments to assume responsibility for the consequences of their corporate actions. Although information technologies advance rapidly, data collection still heavily relies on manual input, static reports and to a broad extent the integration of stakeholders is not yet the general rule. Data-driven technologies like Participatory Sensing methods, Linked Open Data practices or Geographical Information Systems are useful methods to collect, aggregate and disseminate information. This paper outlines the problem scope, the solution approach and the research plan for my doctoral thesis which explores the potential of these technologies to improve the transparency of corporate sustainability using a design-science based approach. Experiences gained by designing and evaluating IT artifacts are expected to bring new insights about the relation of IT and corporate sustainability where existing research is still sparse.

Keywords

Corporate Sustainability Participatory Sensing Linked Data GIS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbot, J., Chambers, R., Dunn, C., Harris, T., de Merode, E., Porter, G., Townsend, J., Weiner, D.: Participatory gis: opportunity or oxymoron? PLA Notes-International Institute for Environment and Development (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonanni, L., Ebner, H., Hockenberry, M., Sayan, B., Brandt, N., Csikszentmihàlyi, N., Ishii, H., Turpeinen, M., Young, S., Zapico Lamela, J.L.: Sourcemap. org: First application of linked and open lca data to support sustainability (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brundtland, G.H.: Report of the World Commission on environment and development: “our common future”. United Nations, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K.: Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11(2), 130–141 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliot, S.: Transdisciplinary perspectives on environmental sustainability: a resource base and framework for it-enabled business transformation. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 197–236 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    García, R., Gil, R.: Publishing xbrl as linked open data. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 538. Citeseer (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldman, J., Shilton, K., Burke, J., Estrin, D., Hansen, M., Ramanathan, N., Reddy, S., Samanta, V., Srivastava, M., West, R.: Participatory sensing: A citizen-powered approach to illuminating the patterns that shape our world. Foresight & Governance Project, White Paper (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hansen, U., Schrader, U.: Corporate social responsibility als aktuelles thema der bwl. Betriebswirtschaft-Stuttgart 65(4), 373 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hondros, C.: Standardizing legal content with owl and rdf. In: Linking Enterprise Data, pp. 221–240. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keating, G.N., Rich, P.M., Witkowski, M.S.: Challenges for enterprise gis. URISA Journal 15(2), 25–39 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larrazábal, A., McCall, M.K., Mwampamba, T.H., Skutsch, M.: The role of community carbon monitoring for redd+: a review of experiences. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4(6), 707–716 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Le-Phuoc, D., Hauswirth, M.: Linked open data in sensor data mashups. In: Proc. Semantic Sensor Networks, p. 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCall, M.K., Minang, P.A.: Assessing participatory gis for community-based natural resource management: claiming community forests in cameroon. The Geographical Journal 171(4), 340–356 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melville, N.: Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. Management Information Systems Quarterly 34(1), 1–21 (2010)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mun, M., Reddy, S., Shilton, K., Yau, N., Burke, J., Estrin, D., Hansen, M., Howard, E., West, R., Boda, P.: Peir, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research. In: Proceedings of the 7th Int. Conference on Mobile Systems, pp. 55–68. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Münstermann, M.: Corporate Social Responsibility: Ausgestaltung und Steuerung von CSR-Aktivitäten, vol. 48. Gabler Verlag (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Okolloh, O.: Ushahidi, or’testimony’: Web 2. 0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory Learning and Action 59(1), 65–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Gengler, C.E., Rossi, M., Hui, W., Virtanen, V., Bragge, J.: The design science research process: a model for producing and presenting information systems research. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006), pp. 83–106 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peterová, R., Hybler, J.: Do-it-yourself environmental sensing. Procedia Computer Science 7, 303–304 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petrini, M., Pozzebon, M.: Managing sustainability with the support of business intelligence: Integrating socio-environmental indicators and organisational context. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 18(4), 178–191 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Resch, B.: People as sensors and collective sensing-contextual observations complementing geo-sensor network measurements. In: Krisp, J.M. (ed.) Progress in Location-Based Services. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, pp. 391–406. Springer, Heidelberg (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34203-5_22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Save the Redwoods League: About save the redwoods (2013), http://www.savetheredwoods.org/
  25. 25.
    Tripathi, N., Bhattarya, S.: Integrating indigenous knowledge and gis for participatory natural resource management: state of the practice. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 17 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    UN Global Compact: Formation of the international integrated reporting committee (iirc) (2010), http://www.unglobalcompact.org/news/57-08-02-2010
  27. 27.
    Watson, R., Boudreau, M., Chen, A.: Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the is community. Management Information Systems Quarterly 34(1), 23–38 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wheeler, D., Elkington, J.: The end of the corporate environmental report? or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication. Business Strategy and the Environment 10(1), 1–14 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zapico Lamela, J.L., Sayan, B., Bonanni, L., Turpeinen, M., Steve, Y.: Footprinted. org–experiences from using linked open data for environmental impact information. In: Proceedings of the 25th EnviroInfo Conference–Innovations in Sharing Environmental Observations and Information, pp. 1–9. Schaker-Verlag (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Madlberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Vienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations