Investigations on User Preferences of the Alignment of Process Activities, Objects and Roles
Numerous attempts have been made to research the variety of different influences on the understandability of process models. Common to all of these attempts is the limitation to the process model itself. Little empirical effort is spent on investigating the understandability of the alignment of process activities, objects, and roles. This paper tackles this issue and empirically studies preferences of how to visually align process activities with objects and roles. In particular, three visualization techniques are evaluated in order to support the combination of the object and organization units with their corresponding process model elements. The empirical study provides a strong support for the visualization of a process model that is disburdened from context information such as objects used and roles involved and thus is reduced to the sole visualization of process activities and its control-flow.
Keywordsprocess modeling understandability model visualization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Betz, S., Eichhorn, D., Hickl, S., Klink, S., Koschmider, A., Li, Y., Oberweis, A., Trunko, R.: 3D Representation of Business Process Models. In: MobIS 2008, pp. 73–87 (2008)Google Scholar
- 2.Cardoso, J.: Process control-flow complexity metric: An empirical validation. In: IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp. 167–173 (2006)Google Scholar
- 5.Hipp, M., Michelberger, B., Mutschler, B., Reichert, M.: A Framework for the Intelligent Delivery and User-Adequate Visualization of Process Information. In: 28th Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2013), Coimbra, Portugal. ACM Press (March 2013)Google Scholar
- 6.Kolb, J., Reichert, M.: Data Flow Abstractions and Adaptations through Updatable Process Views. In: 28th Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2013), Coimbra, Portugal. ACM Press (March 2013)Google Scholar
- 7.Koschmider, A., Reijers, H.A., Dijman, R.: Empirical Support for the Usefulness of Personalized Process Model Views, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012, Braunschweig (March 2012)Google Scholar
- 10.North, C.: Information Visualization. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 3rd edn., pp. 1222–1246. John Wiley & Sons (2005)Google Scholar
- 11.Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: How Good is BPMN Really? Insights from Theory and Practice. In: Proceedings 14th European Conference on Information Systems, Goeteborg, Sweden (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.Reinhard, T.: Complexity management in graphical models. Dissertation. University of Zurich (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Sweller, J.: Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In: Ross, B. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 43, pp. 215–266. Academic Press (2003)Google Scholar