Advertisement

Modelling Behaviour Semantically

  • David Butt
  • Rebekah Wegener
  • Jörg Cassens
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8175)

Abstract

Context is only one of several strata of meaning and we can not predict realisation at the lexical or grammatical level from context alone. Yet, there is a tendency to confuse contextual patterning with semantic patterning and allocate patterning to the contextual level that might better be dealt with on other levels. While much work has been done on theorising lexis and grammar and, more recently, on seeing these in context, much remains to be done on theorising semantics as a separate level mediating between context and lexis and grammar. This paper examines the problem of modelling behaviour and the challenge of understanding behaviour in context as well as on a semantical level. By understanding the descriptive responsibilities allocated to each level of language, we are better able to see what remains to be covered by context within a model.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, S., Lightfoot, D.: The Language Organ: linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, R., Butow, P., Butt, D.G., Moore, A.R., Tattersall, M.H.: Developing ethical strategies to assist oncologists in seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials. Social Science & Medicine 58, 379–390 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Firth, J.R.: Personality and language in society. Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951, pp. 177–189. Oxford University Press, London (1950, 1957)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halliday, M.A.K., Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.: Construing experience through meaning: a language-based approach to cognition. Cassell, London (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halliday, M.A.K., Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.: An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. Arnold, London (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hasan, R.: Semantic networks: a tool for the analysis of meaning. In: Cloran, C., Butt, D., Williams, G. (eds.) Ways of Saying, Ways of Meaning: Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan. Cassell, London (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hasan, R.: The World in Words: Semiotic Mediation, Tenor, and Ideology. In: Williams, G., Lukin, A. (eds.) The Development of Language: Functional Persectives on Species and Individuals. Continuum, London (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kofod-Petersen, A., Wegener, R., Cassens, J.: Closed Doors – Modelling Intention in Behavioural Interfaces. In: Proceedings of the Norwegian Artificial Intelligence Society Symposium (NAIS 2009). Tapir Forlag, Trondheim (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lamb, S.: Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Georgetown University Press, Georgetown (1966)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lyons, J.: Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solem, J.S., Aambø Fosstveit, H., Blake, R., Kofod-Petersen, A.: Intention-based sliding doors. Poster and Demonstration Presented at SCAI 2011. Proceedings SCAI 2011. IOS Press (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steinberg, D., Jakobvits, L.: Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology, pp. 18–22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1972, 2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Butt
    • 1
  • Rebekah Wegener
    • 2
  • Jörg Cassens
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.First Year Experience UnitMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Institute for Mathematics and Applied InformaticsUniversity of HildesheimHildesheimGermany

Personalised recommendations