MICCAI 2013: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2013 pp 259-266 | Cite as
Automatic Analysis of Pediatric Renal Ultrasound Using Shape, Anatomical and Image Acquisition Priors
Abstract
In this paper we present a segmentation method for ultrasound (US) images of the pediatric kidney, a difficult and barely studied problem. Our method segments the kidney on 2D sagittal US images and relies on minimal user intervention and a combination of improvements made to the Active Shape Model (ASM) framework. Our contributions include particle swarm initialization and profile training with rotation correction. We also introduce our methodology for segmentation of the kidney’s collecting system (CS), based on graph-cuts (GC) with intensity and positional priors. Our intensity model corrects for intensity bias by comparison with other biased versions of the most similar kidneys in the training set. We prove significant improvements (p < 0.001) with respect to classic ASM and GC for kidney and CS segmentation, respectively. We use our semi-automatic method to compute the hydronephrosis index (HI) with an average error of 2.67±5.22 percentage points similar to the error of manual HI between different operators of 2.31±4.54 percentage points.
Keywords
Particle Swarm Optimization Probability Density Function Training Image Kernel Density Estimation Active Shape ModelPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Martín-Fernández, M., Alberola-Lopez, C.: An approach for contour detection of human kidneys from ultrasound images using Markov random fields and active contours. Med. Image. Anal. 9(1), 1–23 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Xie, J., Jiang, Y., Tsui, H.: Segmentation of kidney from ultrasound images based on texture and shape priors. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 24(1), 45–57 (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.Noble, J.: Ultrasound image segmentation and tissue characterization. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H J. Eng. Med. 224(2), 307–316 (2010)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 4.Peters, C., Chevalier, R.: Congenital urinary obstruction: Pathophysiology and clinical evaluation. In: Wein, A., Kavoussi, L., Novick, A., Partin, A., Peters, C. (eds.) Campbell-Walsh Textbook of Urology. Elsevier Inc., Philadelphia (2012)Google Scholar
- 5.Shapiro, S., Wahl, E., Silberstein, M., Steinhardt, G.: Hydronephrosis index: A new method to track patients with hydronephrosis quantitatively. Urology 72(3), 536–538 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., Taylor, C.J.: Active appearance models. In: Burkhardt, H., Neumann, B. (eds.) ECCV 1998. LNCS, vol. 1407, pp. 484–498. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
- 7.Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., Zabih, R.: Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 23(11), 1222–1239 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Clerc, M., Kennedy, J.: The particle swarm - explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(1), 58–73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Xiao, G., Brady, M., Noble, J., Zhang, Y.: Segmentation of ultrasound B-mode images with intensity inhomogeneity correction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 21(1), 48–57 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar