GCPR 2013: Pattern Recognition pp 91-100 | Cite as
Confidence-Based Surface Prior for Energy-Minimization Stereo Matching
Abstract
This paper presents a novel confidence-based surface prior for energy minimization formulations of dense stereo matching. Given a dense disparity estimation we fit planes, in disparity space, to regions of the image. For each pixel, the probability of its depth lying on an object plane is modeled as a Gaussian distribution, whose variance is determined using the confidence from a previous matching. We then recalculate a new disparity estimation with the addition of our novel confidence-based surface prior. The process is then repeated. Unlike many region-based methods, our method defines an energy formulation over pixels, instead of regions in a segmentation; this results in a decreased sensitivity to the quality of the initial segmentation. Our confidence-based surface prior differs from existing surface constraints in that it varies the per-pixel strength of the constraint to be proportional to the confidence in our given disparity estimation. The addition of our surface prior has three main benefits: sharp object-boundary edges in areas of depth discontinuity; accurate disparity in surface regions; and low sensitivity to segmentation. We evaluate our method using Middlebury stereo sets and more challenging remote sensing data. Our experimental results demonstrate that our approach has superior performance on these data sets.
Keywords
Soft Constraint Hard Constraint Stereo Match Disparity Estimation Match CostPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Bleyer, M., Rother, C., Kohli, P.: Surface stereo with soft segmentation. In: CVPR, pp. 1570–1577 (2010)Google Scholar
- 2.Bleyer, M., Rother, C., Kohli, P., Scharstein, D., Sinha, S.: Object stereo — joint stereo matching and object segmentation. In: CVPR, pp. 3081–3088 (2011)Google Scholar
- 3.Boykov, Y., Kolmogorov, V.: An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. PAMI 26(9), 1124–1137 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Comaniciu, D., Meer, P.: Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. PAMI 24(5), 603–619 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Hirschmüller, H.: Stereo processing by semiglobal matching and mutual information. PAMI 30(2), 328–341 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Klaus, A., Sormann, M., Karner, K.: Segment-based stereo matching using belief propagation and a self-adapting dissimilarity measure. In: ICPR, vol. 3, pp. 15–18 (2006)Google Scholar
- 7.Kurz, F., Türmer, S., Meynberg, O., Rosenbaum, D., Runge, H., Reinartz, P., Leitloff, J.: Low-cost optical camera systems for real-time mapping applications. PFG 2, 159–176 (2012)Google Scholar
- 8.Scharstein, D., Szeliski, R.: A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. IJCV 47(1-3), 7–42 (2002), http://vision.middlebury.edu/stereo/ CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.Sun, J., Li, Y., Kang, S.B., Shum, H.Y.: Symmetric stereo matching for occlusion handling. In: CVPR, vol. 2, pp. 399–406 (2005)Google Scholar
- 10.Sun, J., Zheng, N.N., Shum, H.Y.: Stereo matching using belief propagation. PAMI 25(7), 787–800 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Taguchi, Y., Wilburn, B., Zitnick, L.: Stereo reconstruction with mixed pixels using adaptive over-segmentation. In: CVPR (2008)Google Scholar
- 12.Wang, Z.F., Zheng, Z.G.: A region based stereo matching algorithm using cooperative optimization. In: CVPR (2008)Google Scholar
- 13.Woodford, O.J., Torr, P.H.S., Reid, I.D., Fitzgibbon, A.W.: Global stereo reconstruction under second-order smoothness priors. PAMI 31-12, 2115–2128 (2009)Google Scholar
- 14.Zabih, R., Woodfill, J.: Non-parametric local transforms for computing visual correspondence. In: Sandini, G. (ed.) ECCV 1992. LNCS, vol. 588, Springer, Heidelberg (1992)Google Scholar