Advertisement

Users Requirements in Audiovisual Search: A Quantitative Approach

  • Danish Nadeem
  • Roeland Ordelman
  • Robin Aly
  • Erwin Verbruggen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8092)

Abstract

This paper reports on the results of a quantitative analysis of user requirements for audiovisual search that allow the categorisation of requirements and to compare requirements across user groups. The categorisation provides clear directions with respect to the prioritisation of system features from the perspective of the development of systems for specific, single user groups and systems that have a more general target user group.

Keywords

User Group Concept Mapping Digital Library User Requirement Mobile Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Börner, D., Glahn, C., Stoyanov, S., Kalz, M., Specht, M.: Expert concept mapping study on mobile learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems 27(4), 240–253 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cunningham, S.J., Nichols, D.M.: How people find videos. In: JCDL, pp. 201–210 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Everitt, B.: Cluster Analysis, 2nd edn. Halsted Press, A Division of John Wiley and Son, New York (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huurnink, B.: Search in Audiovisual Broadcast Archives. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kane, M., Trochim, W.: Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kleppe, M., Kemman, M., Beunders, H.: User Requirements Report V1. In EU Project No. 269980 AXES (2011), http://www.axes-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/AXES-D1.2.pdf
  7. 7.
    Kruskal, J.B., Wish, M.: Multidimensional Scaling. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, vol. 31. Sage Publications (1978)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McKay, D., Shukla, P., Hunt, R., Cunningham, S.J.: Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: Three new approaches to browsing in greenstone. Int. J. on Digital Libraries 4(4), 283–297 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mead, J.P., Gay, G.: Concept mapping: An innovative approach to digital library design and evaluation. SIGOIS Bull. 16(2), 10–14 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nadeem, D., Stoyanov, S., Koper, R.: Using concept mapping for needs analysis for a social support system in learning network. iJIM 5(1), 41–46 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trochim, W.: An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. In: Trochim, W. (ed.) A Special Issue of Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 12, pp. 1–16 (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danish Nadeem
    • 1
  • Roeland Ordelman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robin Aly
    • 1
  • Erwin Verbruggen
    • 2
  1. 1.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Netherlands Institute for Sound and VisionHilversumThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations