Advertisement

Diverse Ecologies – Interdisciplinary Development for Cultural Education

  • Michael Heidt
  • Kalja Kanellopoulos
  • Linda Pfeiffer
  • Paul Rosenthal
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8120)

Abstract

We present a case study outlining development efforts towards an interface ecology to be deployed in museums. We argue that the problem at hand calls for a highly interdisciplinary design process. Furthermore, system design in the domain of cultural education poses a unique set of challenges. At the same time few existing design methodologies are suitable for addressing this special environment of system design. We outline a set of tentative methodological elements aimed at informing adequate interdisciplinary development processes. The discussion is embedded into a critique of existing methodologies while being orientated towards inviting critique itself. The guiding insight steering our methodological developments is that fundamental differences between project participants and other stakeholders should be construed as assets. Rather than trying to integrate them or covering them up, the dynamic friction between differing viewpoints can be rendered productive by means of poietic practices.

Keywords

interdisciplinarity museum informatics design for cultural experience 

References

  1. 1.
    Reussner, E.M., Schwan, S., Zahn, C.: New Technologies for Learning in Museums: An Interdisciplinary Research Project. In: Trant, J., Bearman, D. (eds.) International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting (ICHIM 2007): Proceedings. Archives & Museum Informatics, Toronto (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mackay, W., Fayard, A.: HCI, natural science and design: a framework for triangulation across disciplines. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 223–234 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hughes, J.A., Brien, J.O., Rodden, T., Plc, N.B.: Designing with Ethnography: A Presentation Framework for Design, pp. 147–158Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., Andersen, H.: Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design (1994) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile software development with Scrum. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heidt, M.: Examining Interdisciplinary Prototyping in the Context of Cultural Communication. In: HCI International 2013 (in press, 2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suchman, L.: Do Categories Have Politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered, pp. 177–190 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dourish, P.: Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. The MIT Press (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suchman, L.A.: Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muller, M., Kuhn, S.: Participatory design. Communications of the ACM (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friedman, B., Borning, A.: Value Sensitive Design as a Pattern: Examples from Informed Consent in Web Browsers and from Urban Simulation. Design (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Hall, G.: A Value-Sensitive Design Approach to Augmented Reality. Design, 163–164 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Louise, J., Davis, N.: Value Sensitive Design of Interactions with UrbanSim Indicators. Design (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borning, A., Muller, M.: Next steps for value sensitive design. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2012, p. 1125 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Agre, P.: Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform Al. Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, 1–17 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agre, P.E.: The soul gained and lost: artificial intelligence as a philosophical project. Stanford Hum. Rev. 4, 1–19 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agre, P.E.: Computation and Human Experience. Cambridge University Press (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dourish, P., Finlay, J., Sengers, P., Wright, P.: Reflective HCI: Towards a Critical Technical Practice (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Heidt
    • 1
  • Kalja Kanellopoulos
    • 1
  • Linda Pfeiffer
    • 2
  • Paul Rosenthal
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Training Group ‘crossWorlds’Chemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany
  2. 2.Visual Computing LaboratoryChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations