Advertisement

Introducing New Perspectives in the Use of Social Technologies in Learning: Social Constructionism

  • Antigoni Parmaxi
  • Panayiotis Zaphiris
  • Eleni Michailidou
  • Salomi Papadima-Sophocleous
  • Andri Ioannou
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8118)

Abstract

This paper reports on a qualitative study of the use of social technologies, explored in the context of an intensive 650-hour Greek language course. Qualitative content analysis of instructors’ field notes, students’ and instructors’ reflections, interviews and a focus group was employed aiming at identifying the use of social technologies as a platform for constructing an online artifact. To triangulate the findings, the study also collected data by observing students’ activity with social technologies. A code scheme was developed which manifests the use of social technologies as a social constructionism platform identifying its major dimensions: exploration of ideas, construction of online artifact and evaluation of the constructed artifact. Actions within each dimension that indicate the manifestation of social constructionism are identified and discussed. This study revealed results in favor of the use of social technologies as social constructing platforms suggesting a new framework for their use.

Keywords

social technologies web 2.0 technologies social constructionism online artifact 

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, L.B.: Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(3), 199–226 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexander, B.: Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching. Educause Review 41(2), 32–44 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arslan, R.Ş., Şahin–Kızıl, A.: How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning 23(3), 183–197 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bloch, J.: Abdullah’s blogging: A generation 1.5 student enters the blogosphere. Language Learning & Technology 11(2), 128–141 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradley, L., Lindström, B., Rystedt, H.: Rationalities of collaboration for language learning in a wiki. ReCALL 22(2), 247–265 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dippold, D.: Peer feedback through blogs: student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCALL 21(1), 18–36 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gamper, J., Knapp, J.: A review of Intelligent CALL systems. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15(4), 329–342 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glassman, M., Kang, M.J.: The logic of wikis: The possibilities of the Web 2.0 classroom. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6(1), 93–112 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldberg, A., Russell, M., Cook, A.: The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992-2002. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment 2(1) (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ioannou, A.: Collaborative Learning: The Promise of Wikis. Word Journal of the International Linguistic Association 38(3), 213–224 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kárpáti, A.: Web 2 technologies for Net Native language learners: A “social CALL”. ReCALL 21(2), 139–156 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kern, R.: Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly 40, 183–210 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kessler, G., Bikowski, D.: Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning 23(1), 41–58 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, L.: Promoting intercultural exchanges with blogs and podcasting: a study of Spanish– American telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22(5), 425–443 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, L.: Exploring wiki–mediated collaborative writing: a case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal 27(2), 260–276 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, L.: Fostering reflective writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course. ReCALL 22(2), 212–227 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLoughlin, C., Lee, M.J.W.: Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In: Atkinson, R.J., McBeath, C., Soong, S.K.A., Cheers, C. (eds.) ICT Providing Choices for Learners and Learning Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007, vol. 2007, pp. 664–675. Ascilite Singapore (2007), http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf (retrieved)
  18. 18.
    Miceli, T., Murray, S.V., Kennedy, C.: Using an L2 blog to enhance learners’ participation and sense of community. Computer Assisted Language Learning 23(4), 321–341 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nisiforou, E., Laghos, A.: An Overview: The Development of ICT in the Educational System of Cyprus. In: Global Learn Asia Pacific, vol. 2011(1), pp. 534–539 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Papadima-Sophocleous, P., Parmaxi, A.: The use of wiki in teaching and learning Greek as a second language for specific academic purposes: challenges and future perspectives. In: Buston, J., Tsagari, D., Doa, F. (eds.) Foreign Language Instructional Technology: Theory & Practice, pp. 128–139. University of Nicosia Press, Nicosia (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papert, S., Harel, I.: Situating Constructionism. In: Papert, S., Harel, I. (eds.) Constructionism, vol. 36, pp. 1–11. Ablex Publishing (1991)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papert, S.: The Children’s Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. Basic Books, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parker, K.R., Chao, J.T.: Wiki as a Teaching Tool. Learning 3(3), 57–72 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Incorporated (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P.: Patterns of empathy in online communication. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2007, pp. 919–928. ACM Press (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    QSR International. Nvivo 10 qualitative research softwareGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rivens Mompean, A.: The development of meaningful interactions on a blog used for the learning of English as a Foreign Language. ReCALL 22(3), 376–395 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ruschoff, B., Ritter, M.: Technology-Enhanced Language Learning: Construction of Knowledge and Template-Based Learning in the Foreign Language Classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning 14(3-4), 219–232 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Seitzinger, J.: Be Constructive: Blogs, Podcasts, and Wikis as Constructivist Learning Tools. Learning Solutions eMagazine, 1–16 (July 31, 2006), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.121.4071&rep=rep1&type=pdf (retrieved)
  31. 31.
    Smith, P.L., Ragan, T.J.: Instructional design, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stemler, S.: An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment Research Evaluation 7(17), 479–498 (2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sun, Y.C.: Voice blog: an exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning and Technology 13(2), 88–103 (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Taylor, A.M.: The effects of CALL versus traditional L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. CALICO Journal 23(2), 309–318 (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taylor, A.M.: CALL-based versus Paper-based glosses: Is there a difference in reading comprehension? CALICO Journal 27(1), 147–160 (2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Welsh, E.: Dealing with Data: Using NVivo in the Qualitative Data Analysis Process 1. Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis 3(2), 1–7 (2002)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yun, J.: The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(1), 39–58 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zaphiris, P., Zacharia, G., Rajasekaran, M.: Distributed Constructionism through Participatory Design. Group, pp. 164–179 (2003), http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GaUGjcpjo7AC&oi=fnd&pg=PA164&dq=Distributed+Constructionism+through+Participatory+Design&ots=nr3a7UZes7&sig=Mwum2xiy41oDbi2x4zrRUe-0Z8M (retrieved)
  39. 39.
    Zhao, Y.: Recent development in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal 21(1), 7–27 (2003)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bateman, S., Farzan, R., Brusilovsky, P., Mccalla, G.: OATS: The Open Annotation and Tagging System. Information Sciences (2006), http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=OATS+the+open+annotation+and+tagging+system&btnG=Search#0 (retrieved)
  41. 41.
    Bateman, S., Brooks, C., McCalla, G., Brusilovsky, P.: Applying Collaborative Tagging to E-Learning. Human Factors 3(4), 1–7 (2007), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.64.8892&rep=rep1&type=pdf (retrieved)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antigoni Parmaxi
    • 1
  • Panayiotis Zaphiris
    • 1
  • Eleni Michailidou
    • 1
  • Salomi Papadima-Sophocleous
    • 2
  • Andri Ioannou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Multimedia and Graphic ArtsCyprus University of TechnologyLemesosCyprus
  2. 2.Language CentreCyprus University of TechnologyLemesosCyprus

Personalised recommendations